Prediction of Raphael Collignon [83rd] vs Liam Draxl [159th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W W W W L
Form
L W L W W W W L W LH2H: Collignon 1 - 0 Draxl
They have played 2 sets in total, with Collignon winning 2 and Draxl winning 0. The last match between Collignon and Draxl was at the Lugano Challenger, 28-02-2025, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Raphael Collignon getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Raphael Collignon | 1 |
| Liam Draxl | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Raphael Collignon
Player
Liam Draxl
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:46:31 | Average Match Time | 1:46:31 |
| 76% (55/72) | 1st Serve % | 68% (52/77) |
| 73% (40/55) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (34/52) |
| 47% (8/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (13/25) |
| 33% (2/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/4) |
| 39% (30/77) | Return Points Win % | 33% (24/72) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Raphael Collignon vs Liam Draxl Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Collignon 1 - 0 Draxl
Editorial Prediction:
Analyzing the performance of Collignon and Draxl in recent months provides valuable insights into the dynamics of their impending match. Collignon has displayed a marginal advantage on second serve points, winning 45.79% compared to Draxl's 40.74%, a statistic often linked to predicting match outcomes. However, when considering their effectiveness in returning opponents' second serves, Draxl edges out Collignon, boasting a win rate of 49.53% to Collignon’s 48.15%. These serve return metrics are crucial for determining the favored player in head-to-head encounters.
Further scrutiny of their first serve return performance reveals Draxl leading with 25.84% over Collignon’s 24.16%, adding another layer to comparative analysis in this matchup. Under pressure, Collignon demonstrates resilience with a 54.81% breakpoint save rate, while Draxl has maintained a respectable 50.4%. Such stats are vital for in-game betting, where predicting player responses during pivotal moments can be decisive.
In terms of career surface variations, Collignon and Draxl each exhibit strengths and weaknesses. Collignon's most triumphal surface is clay, on which they boast a 74% win percentage. Conversely, Draxl shines on indoor hard courts with a 71% win rate. These surface-specific performances provide context for anticipation of their capabilities under different conditions.
Both players have concentrated heavily on the Challengers/ITF circuit over the past year, though Collignon has shown superior form, securing 77.78% of his matches compared to Draxl's 63.16%. This higher success rate in similar-level events slightly favors Collignon as a potential victor when accounting for the weight of competitive environments on performance.
Head-to-head performance projection further leans towards Collignon, who aside from a slight edge in recent win-loss records - 76.34% over Draxl's 69.66% - has competed against marginally lower-ranked opponents on average, with an opponent rank mean of 334.57 against Draxl's 329.81. Both players exhibit nearly equal competence in deciding sets, with Collignon at 63% and Draxl at 64%, adding another nuanced element for live prediction scenarios.
Evaluating breakpoint conversion efficiency, Draxl has been marginally better at capitalizing on opportunities with a 33.9% conversion rate compared to Collignon's 29.53%. Yet, taking into account the cumulative data and statistical prevalence, Collignon’s overall consistency in metrics relating to percentage wins, serving, and match form slightly tilt the scale in his favor for this encounter. Consequently, based on these analyses, Collignon emerges as the likely favorite to clinch the match.
Raphael Collignon Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Raphael Collignon
83%
(
67 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
0
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Guy Den Ouden
46%
(
39 of
85)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
5
Aces
4
12
Double Faults
5
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
39%
(
18 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Jerome Kym
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Dalibor Svrcina
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve %
75%
(
30 of
40)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
51
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Jan Choinski
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
93)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Federico Cina
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Raphael Collignon
72%
(
64 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
12
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
52 of
64)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
27 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
108)
104
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Fabio Fognini
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
55)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Liam Draxl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Collarini
Player
Liam Draxl
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
49%
(
51 of
104)
10
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
24%
(
6 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
104)
103
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Liam Draxl
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Andres Andrade
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
2
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Patrick Maloney
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
6
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
9
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Gonzalo Bueno
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
48 of
89)
86
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Colton Smith
Player
Liam Draxl
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
79%
(
53 of
67)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
William Grant
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
16%
(
7 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Liam Draxl
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67% (193/95) | Win/Loss | 65% (186/100) |
| 64% (424/234) | Sets Win/Loss | 63% (404/238) |
| 56% (3439/2716) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (3307/2666) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.32 |
| 949 | Aces Total | 930 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 895 | Total Double Faults | 791 |
| 1:33:26 | Average Match Time | 1:40:4 |
| 377.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 413.95 |
| 64% (11420/17749) | 1st Serve % | 65% (11562/17707) |
| 70% (8019/11420) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (8036/11562) |
| 49% (3086/6329) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3070/6145) |
| 46% (985/2132) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (921/1958) |
| 43% (8015/18684) | Return Points Win % | 42% (7585/17866) |
| 67% (188/281) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (181/276) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 58% (42/72) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (42/72) |
| 51% (44/86) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (41/73) |
| 88% (189/167) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (184/168) |
| 12% (189/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (184/14) |
| 25% (99/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (102/19) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
