Raphael Collignon vs Khumoun Sultanov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L L W W L
Form
L W L W L W L L L LHead-2-Head: Collignon 2 - 1 Sultanov
They have played 7 sets in total, with Collignon winning 4 and Sultanov winning 3. The last match between Collignon and Sultanov was at the Monza Challenger, 09-04-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Raphael Collignon getting the victory 6-2 4-6 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Raphael Collignon | 2 |
| Khumoun Sultanov | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Monza Challenger(09-04-2025)
Raphael Collignon
Khumoun Sultanov
6
2
4
6
6
0
| Collignon | Stats | Sultanov |
|---|---|---|
| 66% (19-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 46% (11-13) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 87 | Ranking | 228 |
| 81 | Highest Rank | 215 |
| 23 | Age | 26 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 9 |
| 67% (195-97) | Career Total W/L | 62% (302-188) |
| $63,295 | Career Prize Money | $72,000 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Etcheverry VS Agut PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Darderi VS Giron PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 4-6 6-0 |
Stats 
Raphael Collignon
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
93)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Raphael Collignon
50%
(
34 of
68)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 35 | Games Won | 25 |
| 14 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:35:26 | Average Match Time | 1:35:26 |
| 68% (127/188) | 1st Serve % | 58% (128/220) |
| 65% (83/127) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (65/128) |
| 52% (32/61) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (50/92) |
| 43% (13/30) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 35% (7/20) |
| 48% (105/220) | Return Points Win % | 39% (73/188) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Collignon vs Sultanov Match Preview :
Analyzing the second serve performance over the past six months, Collignon has demonstrated a slight edge with a success rate of 45.68% compared to Sultanov's 43.08%. This particular statistic has shown a strong correlation with predicting match outcomes, suggesting a potential advantage for Collignon in this aspect of the game.
When examining players' return game statistics, Collignon again shows superiority by winning 47.99% of second serve return points, as opposed to Sultanov's 44.94%. However, Sultanov outperforms Collignon on first serve returns, capturing 28.12% compared to Collignon's 23.42% of points. Such nuances in return stats contribute to identifying the favorites, especially in head-to-head matchups.
Delving into performance under pressure, Collignon displays a higher breakpoint save rate of 55.69%, while Sultanov stands at 49.63%. This metric is especially useful for those aiming to make accurate in-game betting predictions. Moreover, their overall match-winning percentages in the past year significantly impact the head-to-head predictions, with Collignon holding a 75.82% win rate (W/L 69/22) and Sultanov slightly trailing at 71.11% (W/L 64/26).
Regarding surface preferences, Sultanov exhibits the highest career win percentage on Hard courts, holding a 66% win rate. Collignon, conversely, performs best on Clay surfaces with a 74% win percentage. Both players show similar performances on Grass, winning 50% of their matches.
The comparison of players' levels reveals that Sultanov's most played matches were at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, with a win rate of 80.36%, whereas Collignon spent more time in the Challengers/ITF above $10K tournaments, winning 76% of his matches. Such distinctions offer context on each player's competitive environment and influences predictions.
In direct head-to-head encounters, Sultanov and Collignon have each claimed one victory out of two past matches. Sultanov last triumphed over Collignon in their most recent clash on a Hard court at the Manacor Challenger, securing a straight-sets win of 6-3, 6-4. Their average match duration has been recorded at 1:25:15, and they have yet to play a tiebreak against each other.
Delving into their deciding set performances, Sultanov demonstrates proficiency, having won 70% of such sets over the last 12 months, compared to Collignon's 65% rate. While they have yet to reach a deciding set in their direct matches, this insight is valuable for live predictions should the current match extend to that point.
Considering recent form, Sultanov converts breakpoints at a rate of 30.56%, while Collignon converts slightly more efficiently at 32.76%. These figures are pivotal for providing in-game betting insights when potential breakpoints arise.
Based on a thorough comparison across these statistical metrics, Collignon emerges as the slight favorite for the upcoming match. His consistent outperformance in several key areas, alongside his strong record against higher-ranked opponents, suggests he maintains an edge over Sultanov going into this encounter.
Collignon vs Sultanov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Raphael Collignon Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Raphael Collignon
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
50%
(
17 of
34)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
24%
(
4 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
51%
(
20 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
38
Total Points Won
35
|
6-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Patrick Zahraj
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
3
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Raphael Collignon
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Raphael Collignon
83%
(
67 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
0
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Guy Den Ouden
46%
(
39 of
85)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
5
Aces
4
12
Double Faults
5
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
39%
(
18 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Jerome Kym
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Khumoun Sultanov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hady Habib
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
16
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
93)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Lukas Klein
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matej Dodig
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
58
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Oleksandr Ovcharenko
63%
(
67 of
107)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
44 of
58)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
43 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
104
|
2-6 7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67% (195/97) | Win/Loss | 62% (302/188) |
| 64% (428/237) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (659/448) |
| 56% (3477/2748) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (5580/4734) |
| 59% (36/25) | Hard Win/Loss | 66% (173/88) |
| 74% (111/40) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (87/65) |
| 60% (47/31) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (41/34) |
| 50% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 964 | Aces Total | 1555 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 918 | Total Double Faults | 1025 |
| 1:33:15 | Average Match Time | 1:30:37 |
| 377.26 | Average Opponent Rank | 490.17 |
| 64% (11548/17956) | 1st Serve % | 62% (18255/29505) |
| 70% (8105/11548) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (12361/18255) |
| 49% (3118/6408) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5753/11251) |
| 46% (1000/2156) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1441/3217) |
| 43% (8119/18902) | Return Points Win % | 42% (12470/29827) |
| 25% (1/3) | Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | Cups W/L | 45% (5/6) |
| 43% (3/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 65% (70/37) | Challenger W/L | 48% (67/73) |
| 71% (121/50) | Futures W/L | 69% (229/105) |
| 67% (190/284) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (300/486) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 59% (43/73) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (85/148) |
| 51% (44/86) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (72/127) |
| 88% (191/169) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (289/261) |
| 12% (191/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (289/28) |
| 25% (101/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (201/41) |
Collignon vs. Sultanov Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
