K. Kawa
To Win
M. Sherif
To Win
Ranah Akua Stoiber vs Katarzyna Kawa Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W W W L L L
Form
W L W W L W L W W WHead-2-Head: Stoiber 0 - 1 Kawa
They have played 3 sets in total, with Stoiber winning 1 and Kawa winning 2. The last match between Stoiber and Kawa was at the Wimbledon - London, 24-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with Katarzyna Kawa getting the victory 5-7 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ranah Akua Stoiber | 0 |
| Katarzyna Kawa | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Wimbledon - London(24-06-2025)
Katarzyna Kawa
Ranah Akua Stoiber
5
7
6
4
6
1
| Stoiber | Stats | Kawa |
|---|---|---|
| 59% (23-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 61% (27-17) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 560 | Ranking | 132 |
| 465 | Highest Rank | 112 |
| 20 | Age | 32 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 7 |
| 54% (68-57) | Career Total W/L | 57% (437-331) |
| $6,603 | Career Prize Money | $359,013 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Anisimova VS Swiatek PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
12 Jul 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Katarzyna Kawa
Player
Ranah Akua Stoiber
54%
(
57 of
105)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
45 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 12 | Games Won | 17 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:10:0 | Average Match Time | 2:10:0 |
| 61% (57/93) | 1st Serve % | 54% (57/105) |
| 60% (34/57) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (37/57) |
| 47% (17/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (23/48) |
| 33% (3/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (6/12) |
| 43% (45/105) | Return Points Win % | 45% (42/93) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Stoiber vs Kawa Match Preview :
- Stoiber excels in second serve points, securing 43.42% compared to Kawa's 39.19%. Does this give Stoiber an advantage? It certainly could influence match outcomes.
- When it comes to returning, Kawa leads with 51.92% of opponent’s second serve points compared to Stoiber's 49.45%.
- In first serve returns, Kawa also leads, achieving 37.2% over Stoiber's 32.77%. These trends might point towards Kawa having stronger return games.
- Stoiber shows slightly better resilience under pressure by saving 49.12% of breakpoints compared to Kawa's 45.09%.
- Over the past year, Stoiber won 58.18% of their matches, narrowly surpassing Kawa's 54.55% win rate, suggesting a marginally stronger overall performance.
- Clay is Stoiber's top surface with a 67% win rate, whereas Grass is best for Kawa at 60%.
- Both players perform similarly in Challenger/ITF tournaments, with Kawa marginally ahead in match wins, having beaten higher-ranked opponents on average.
- In deciding sets, Kawa holds the upper hand, winning 52% compared to Stoiber's 46%, hinting at stronger endurance.
- Breakpoint conversion is higher for Kawa at 46.12%, while Stoiber trails at 39.2%, which could influence pivotal match moments.
Editorial Prediction (June 24, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Stoiber and Kawa presents an intriguing set of statistics. While Stoiber showcases brilliance in second serve success and breakpoint saving ability, Kawa brings an impressive return game and breakpoint conversion rate to the table.
Despite the slightly higher match win percentage owned by Stoiber, Kawa's ability to battle through deciding sets and face higher-ranked opponents effectively could tilt the outcome.
Factoring in Kawa's superior return stats and breakpoint conversion, Kawa appears more likely to clinch the victory in this clash.
Stoiber vs Kawa Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Ranah Akua Stoiber Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Katarzyna Kawa
Player
Ranah Akua Stoiber
54%
(
57 of
105)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
45 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
96
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diane Parry
Player
Ranah Akua Stoiber
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
69)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vitalia Diatchenko
Player
Ranah Akua Stoiber
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ranah Akua Stoiber
Player
Sara Saito
55%
(
52 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
87%
(
45 of
52)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
32 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ranah Akua Stoiber
Player
Alice Gillan
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
94)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
91
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ranah Akua Stoiber
Player
Adithya Karunaratne
63%
(
59 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
11
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ranah Akua Stoiber
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
29 of
41)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
48
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ranah Akua Stoiber
Player
Angelica Blake
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
18 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
51
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Katarzyna Kawa Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Katarzyna Kawa
Player
Dalma Galfi
44%
(
8 of
18)
1st Serve %
55%
(
6 of
11)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
19
Total Points Won
10
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katarzyna Kawa
Player
Martina Trevisan
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katarzyna Kawa
Player
Nuria Parrizas-Diaz
48%
(
46 of
96)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
47%
(
45 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(1) 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Katarzyna Kawa
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katarzyna Kawa
Player
Julia Riera
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
50%
(
38 of
76)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Katarzyna Kawa
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Katarzyna Kawa
Player
Amarni Banks
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
3
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katarzyna Kawa
Player
Ranah Akua Stoiber
54%
(
57 of
105)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
45 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
96
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (68/57) | Win/Loss | 57% (437/331) |
| 56% (160/128) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (987/788) |
| 52% (1394/1280) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8416/7701) |
| 58% (38/28) | Hard Win/Loss | 51% (81/78) |
| 67% (2/1) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (279/187) |
| 54% (20/17) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51% (54/51) |
| 42% (8/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 61% (23/15) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 424 | Aces Total | 642 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 212 | Total Double Faults | 1915 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:1:45 |
| 366.93 | Average Opponent Rank | 504.44 |
| 57% (4573/7984) | 1st Serve % | 61% (20035/33008) |
| 67% (3052/4573) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (11845/20035) |
| 47% (1610/3411) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (5732/12972) |
| 45% (408/912) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (2233/4392) |
| 43% (3383/7868) | Return Points Win % | 48% (15839/32922) |
| 0% (0/2) | Slam W/L | 38% (12/20) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 20% (1/4) |
| 33% (1/2) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (33/43) |
| 51% (44/42) | Challenger W/L | 59% (306/215) |
| 68% (23/11) | Futures W/L | 64% (83/46) |
| 56% (68/122) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (424/750) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 80% (4/5) |
| 52% (15/29) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (78/142) |
| 44% (17/39) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (125/248) |
| 86% (66/57) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (427/353) |
| 14% (66/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (427/72) |
| 20% (59/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (340/82) |
Stoiber vs. Kawa Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
