Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ran Tian vs Tammi Patterson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tian vs Patterson analysis and find out who is favored!
Ran Tian vs Tammi Patterson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tian has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Patterson has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tian, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Patterson has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tian has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Patterson has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tian has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Patterson winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tian has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 16/ 11), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Patterson has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 107/ 123), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Tian winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Tian winning 4 and Patterson winning 1. The last match between Tian and Patterson was at the Port Pirie, 02-03-2015, First, Hard with Ran Tian getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tian and Patterson have played a deciding set 1 times, with Tian winning 1 times and Patterson 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tian winning 0, and Patterson 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tian has played against opponents with an average rank of while Patterson has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tian has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Patterson has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tian has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Patterson has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tian 2 - 0 Patterson
Ret.
Rank
297
High
30
Age
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
289
High
34
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
52% (138-125)
Career Total W/L
45% (151-187)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,005
Career Prize Money
$14,070
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ran Tian | Tammi Patterson |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 25 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-1 | |||||
| 1-6 6-3 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ran Tian | Tammi Patterson |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Ran Tian Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Mai Minokoshi
Player
Ran Tian
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
27 of
38)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
61
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(1) ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Ran Tian
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyun Han
Player
Ran Tian
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
20)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ao Gai
Player
Ran Tian
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Junri Namigata
Player
Ran Tian
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve %
47%
(
14 of
30)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
48
Total Points Won
12
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 5-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Ran Tian
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tammi Patterson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 2-6 6-3 11-9 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Naiktha Bains
Player
Tammi Patterson
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tammi Patterson
Player
Romy Koelzer
73%
(
70 of
96)
1st Serve %
54%
(
60 of
112)
6
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
12
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
48 of
60)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
19 of
52)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
31 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
112)
110
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Isabelle Wallace
Player
Tammi Patterson
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Abbie Myers
Player
Tammi Patterson
42%
(
32 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tammi Patterson
Player
Sara Tomic
61%
(
63 of
103)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
4
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
3
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
39 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Astra Sharma
Player
Tammi Patterson
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
8 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
48
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivana Jorovic
Player
Tammi Patterson
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
45%
(
26 of
58)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
11
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diana Marcinkevica
Player
Tammi Patterson
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Freya Christie
Player
Tammi Patterson
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
11
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Tian Vs Patterson Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
