B. Fernandez
To Win
F. Corwin
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L LForm
W L L L W W W L L WThey have played 0 sets in total, with Alba winning 0 and Corwin winning 0. The last match between Alba and Corwin was at the San Luis Potosi Challenger, 14-04-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Rafael De Alba getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-2.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Rafael De Alba | 0 |
Felix Corwin | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: San Luis Potosi Challenger(14-04-2025)
19 Jun 2025 / Second
cinch Championships - London atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-6 6-4 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Rafael De Alba
Player
Felix Corwin
78%
(
63 of
81)
1st Serve %
47%
(
30 of
64)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
11
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Comparing the recent second serve performances, Corwin has demonstrated a more effective play by winning 42.02% of points compared to Alba's 36.48%. This statistic is often highly predictive of match outcomes. In addition, when evaluating return game efficiency over recent months, Corwin has secured 48.27% of points on their opponent's second serve, while Alba has managed a close 47.66%. The return performance on the first serve shows Alba with a slight edge, achieving 28.67% compared to Corwin's 25.72%.
Examining pressure point scenarios, Corwin has a breakpoint save percentage of 52.21%, slightly behind Alba's 53.33%. These figures can prove crucial for in-game betting strategies. Over the past year, Corwin has also maintained a higher match win percentage at 57.63% (W/L 34/25) compared to Alba's 41.46% (W/L 17/24), providing a broad perspective for head-to-head predictions.
Both players have shown specific strengths on clay courts, with Corwin possessing an impressive career surface win percentage of 61% (W/L 65/42), while Alba has achieved a 46% win rate on clay (W/L 6/7). In terms of indoor hard courts, Corwin manages a win rate of 58% (W/L 37/27), whereas Alba has not yet secured a victory, standing at 0% (W/L 0/1).
In the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level events over the past year, Corwin has a winning percentage of 68.57% (W/L 24/11), slightly outperforming Alba who has a 53.33% (W/L 16/14) success rate. Corwin's encounters with opponents have averaged a rank of 445.56, while Alba's opponents have held an average ranking of 280.71, indicating a difference in competition level.
Looking at deciding set performance, should the match extend to a deciding set, Alba holds a strong advantage by winning 88% of such scenarios across all matches played, compared to Corwin's 57%. In terms of break point conversion, Corwin has recently converted 41.43% of break point opportunities, marginally outperforming Alba's conversion rate of 36.73%.
In conclusion, the statistics suggest that Corwin holds a slight edge in recent form, return efficiency, and match win percentages. Though Alba demonstrates strength in deciding sets, Corwin's overall superior performance metrics predict their potential triumph in this match.
Alba vs Corwin Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Alvin Nicholas Tudorica
Player
Rafael De Alba
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
30 of
42)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Tyler Zink
Player
Rafael De Alba
43%
(
26 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Karl Poling
Player
Rafael De Alba
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Marcus Willis
Player
Rafael De Alba
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
65)
6
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Rafael De Alba
43%
(
16 of
37)
1st Serve %
39%
(
15 of
38)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
51
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Felix Corwin
Player
Nicolas Zanellato
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
83%
(
40 of
48)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Denys Klok
Player
Felix Corwin
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
Player
Felix Corwin
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Felix Corwin
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
87%
(
13 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
5 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Felix Corwin
Player
Unknown Player
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
74%
(
26 of
35)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
52
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Felix Corwin
Player
Patricio Betancourt
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Garrett Johns
Player
Felix Corwin
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dan Martin
Player
Felix Corwin
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
0% (0/5) | Win/Loss | 59% (254/176) |
9% (13/124) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (570/436) |
35% (448/836) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5011/4457) |
0% (0/4) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (148/101) |
0% (0/1) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (66/46) |
0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (40/29) |
0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.4 |
51 | Aces Total | 1838 |
0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
168 | Total Double Faults | 1443 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:30:50 |
209.69 | Average Opponent Rank | 472.47 |
60% (1367/2287) | 1st Serve % | 57% (14313/24994) |
60% (820/1367) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (10092/14313) |
38% (345/920) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (4902/10681) |
39% (63/160) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1189/2780) |
35% (774/2227) | Return Points Win % | 42% (10789/25906) |
0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/5) | Challenger W/L | 45% (30/36) |
0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 62% (224/139) |
0% (0/61) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (250/426) |
21% (3/14) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (59/121) |
0% (0/13) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (83/151) |
13% (8/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (243/205) |
75% (8/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (243/38) |
0% (56/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (186/47) |