Radu Mihai Papoe vs Mircea Mortasifu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Papoe vs Mortasifu analysis and find out who is favored!
Radu Mihai Papoe vs Mircea Mortasifu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Papoe has won 58.11% of points on his second serve, while Mortasifu has won 37.14%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Papoe, in recent form, has won 59.26% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mortasifu has won 44.44%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.57% and 41.38% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Papoe has saved 57.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mortasifu has saved 28.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Papoe has won 76.32% of matches played (W/L 29/ 9), with Mortasifu winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Papoe has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 23/ 9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 66/ 34). Mortasifu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 11% (W/L 1/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 11% (W/L 1/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Papoe has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 77.78% of matches (W/L 28/ 8), where as Mortasifu has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 1/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Papoe winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Papoe winning 2 and Mortasifu winning 0. The last match between Papoe and Mortasifu was at the M25 Pitesti, 01-08-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Radu Mihai Papoe getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Papoe and Mortasifu have played a deciding set 0 times, with Papoe winning 0 times and Mortasifu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Papoe winning 0, and Mortasifu 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Papoe has played against opponents with an average rank of 177.97 while Mortasifu has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Papoe has won 88% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mortasifu has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Papoe has converted 49.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mortasifu has converted 80% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Papoe 1 - 0 Mortasifu
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
545
Rank
509
High
21
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
68% (94-45)
Career Total W/L
11% (1-8)
75% (3-1)
YTD W/L
33% (1-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Radu Mihai Papoe | Mircea Mortasifu |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 0 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-0 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Radu Mihai Papoe | Mircea Mortasifu |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 75% (3/1) | 33% (1/2) |
Sets Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 38% (3/5) |
Games Win/Loss | 59% (46/32) | 44% (39/50) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.07 |
Aces Total | 8 | 3 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.05 |
DFs Total | 0 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:36:30 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 71% (169/239) | 52% (38/73) |
1st Serve W% | 68% (115/169) | 63% (24/38) |
2nd Serve W% | 61% (43/70) | 37% (13/35) |
BPs Won% Total | 62% (13/21) | 80% (4/5) |
Return Pts W% | 42% (104/247) | 43% (24/56) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) | 33% (1/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 33% (1/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 33% (3/1) |
Radu Mihai Papoe Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Radu Mihai Papoe
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
11
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Ozan Baris
70%
(
73 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
99
|
1-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Henrik Wiersholm
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
2
Aces
4
-
Double Faults
-
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Radu Mihai Papoe
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
3
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
76
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Preston Stearns
46%
(
18 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Connor Bruce
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
52 of
94)
108
Total Points Won
78
|
6-7(3) 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Liam Draxl
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Perry Gregg
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
74%
(
56 of
76)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
QF |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Angel Diaz Jalil
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Mircea Mortasifu Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Daniele Minighini
Player
Mircea Mortasifu
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 4-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 0-6 6-2 11-9 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H |
view more