Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Radu Mihai Papoe vs Kody Pearson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Papoe vs Pearson analysis and find out who is favored!
Radu Mihai Papoe vs Kody Pearson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Papoe has won 58.11% of points on his second serve, while Pearson has won 47.62%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Papoe, in recent form, has won 59.26% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pearson has won 47.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.57% and 27.26% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Papoe has saved 57.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pearson has saved 57.58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Papoe has won 76.32% of matches played (W/L 29/ 9), with Pearson winning 45.45% (W/L 20/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Papoe has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 23/ 9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 66/ 34). Pearson has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 79/ 60), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Papoe has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 77.78% of matches (W/L 28/ 8), where as Pearson has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 20/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Papoe winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Papoe winning 2 and Pearson winning 0. The last match between Papoe and Pearson was at the M15 Fayetteville, 21-09-2021, Q3, Hard with Radu Mihai Papoe getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Papoe and Pearson have played a deciding set 0 times, with Papoe winning 0 times and Pearson 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Papoe winning 0, and Pearson 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Papoe has played against opponents with an average rank of 177.97 while Pearson has played against players with an average rank of 179.09.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Papoe has won 88% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pearson has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Papoe has converted 49.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pearson has converted 43.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Papoe 1 - 0 Pearson
545
Rank
509
High
21
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
822
Rank
790
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
68% (94-45)
Career Total W/L
52% (107-98)
75% (3-1)
YTD W/L
25% (2-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Radu Mihai Papoe | Kody Pearson |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Radu Mihai Papoe | Kody Pearson |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 75% (3/1) | 25% (2/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 26% (5/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 59% (46/32) | 40% (68/102) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.45 |
| Aces Total | 8 | 38 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.42 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 35 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:30 | 1:36:45 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 226.38 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (169/239) | 60% (314/525) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (115/169) | 65% (204/314) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 61% (43/70) | 46% (98/211) |
| BPs Won% Total | 62% (13/21) | 50% (13/26) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (104/247) | 32% (158/487) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) | 33% (2/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 25% (2/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 29% (7/2) |
Radu Mihai Papoe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Radu Mihai Papoe
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
11
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Ozan Baris
70%
(
73 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
99
|
1-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Henrik Wiersholm
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
2
Aces
4
-
Double Faults
-
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Radu Mihai Papoe
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
3
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
76
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Preston Stearns
46%
(
18 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Connor Bruce
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
52 of
94)
108
Total Points Won
78
|
6-7(3) 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Liam Draxl
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Perry Gregg
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
74%
(
56 of
76)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Angel Diaz Jalil
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Kody Pearson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Kody Pearson
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
8
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
11 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kody Pearson
Player
James Watt
54%
(
51 of
94)
1st Serve %
87%
(
84 of
97)
3
Aces
12
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
61 of
84)
70%
(
30 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
26 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
30 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kody Pearson
Player
Ajeet Rai
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
6
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
4
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesse Delaney
Player
Kody Pearson
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
7
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
9
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Kody Pearson
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Kody Pearson
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Kody Pearson
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesse Delaney
Player
Kody Pearson
50%
(
25 of
50)
1st Serve %
74%
(
34 of
46)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Kody Pearson
53%
(
41 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
11
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
9
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kody Pearson
Player
Jumpei Yamasaki
60%
(
68 of
114)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
0
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
43 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
79)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Papoe Vs Pearson Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
