Prediction of Radu Albot [233rd] vs Taro Daniel [123rd] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L W L L L L
Form
L L W W L L W L L LHead-To-Head: Albot 4 - 1 Daniel
They have played 13 sets in total, with Albot winning 8 and Daniel winning 5. The last match between Albot and Daniel was at the BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells, 04-03-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Radu Albot getting the victory 3-6 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Radu Albot | 4 |
| Taro Daniel | 1 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Radu Albot
Player
Taro Daniel
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
104)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| 6-4 0-6 6-1 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Taro Daniel
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Taro Daniel
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 5-7 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Taro Daniel
81%
(
79 of
97)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
37 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Radu Albot
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 8 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 62 | Games Won | 52 |
| 19 | Aces (Total) | 14 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 1:50:35 | Average Match Time | 1:50:35 |
| 72% (262/364) | 1st Serve % | 64% (236/371) |
| 68% (179/262) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (154/236) |
| 38% (39/102) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (54/135) |
| 45% (21/47) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (17/37) |
| 44% (163/371) | Return Points Win % | 40% (146/364) |
| 80% (4/5) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (3/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 33% (3/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 67% (3/2) |
| 67% (3/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Radu Albot vs Taro Daniel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Albot 4 - 1 Daniel
Editorial Prediction:
How pivotal can the second serve be in the outcome of a tennis match? Let’s dive into Radu Albot and Taro Daniel’s second serve performances over the past six months. Albot has managed to clinch 41.42% of points on his second serve, while Daniel has secured a slightly better 44.31%. This subtle edge could play a crucial role in tipping the scale in Daniel's favor.
When it comes to return games, Albot shines fiercely in recent form. He has won 44.65% of his opponent’s second serve points, surpassing Daniel who stands at 40.82%. Interestingly, when returning first serves, Albot also excels with a success rate of 27.98% compared to Daniel's 21.66%. These figures indicate a potential advantage for Albot if he manages to exploit his return game strength.
Dealing with pressure is another arena where the mental fortitude of these athletes is showcased. Under pressure, Daniel saves 57.98% of breakpoints, outstripping Albot’s 48.35%. This stat could prove insightful for those looking at in-game betting predictions, hinting that Daniel may handle pivotal moments slightly better.
Analyzing their overall performance over the last year, Albot boasts a 51.79% win rate (W/L 29/27), while Daniel trails with a 45% win ratio (W/L 27/33). This suggests Albot has been relatively more successful in recent matchups.
Surface preferences also hint at potential strategic advantages. Albot’s career-best win percentage is on Hard courts at 61%, opposed to Daniel, who thrives on Clay with a 60% success rate. Both seem to falter more on Grass, which might not be a significant factor unless they square off on this tricky surface.
In the realm of player levels, Albot has split his time in Challengers/ITF > $10K tournaments, winning 50% of his games. Daniel, however, has excelled in these lower-tier events with a 65.22% win rate, implying formidable prowess at this competition level.
Their direct Head-to-Head (H2H) encounters sketch a rather favorable picture for Albot, who leads with 3 victories to Daniel's 1. Notably, in deciding sets, Albot dominates, having won 2 out of 2 against Daniel. Interestingly, neither has claimed triumph in a tiebreak against each other — a testament to their evenly matched tenacity under such conditions.
Over the past year, Albot has faced opponents with an average rank of 219.61, whereas Daniel has tackled stiffer competition, averaging ranks of 169.67. Despite this, Albot showcases resilience, particularly in deciding sets across the tour, boasting a 59% win rate compared to Daniel's 40%.
The final frontier, break point conversion, reveals Albot’s superiority once again, converting 41.38% of opportunities compared to Daniel’s 23.62%. This decisively hints toward effective capitalizing on high-stakes situations, potentially favoring Albot in a crunch match.
In light of these statistics, while both competitors exhibit strengths, Radu Albot emerges as the likely victor in their prospective clash. With a stronger H2H record, better surface adaptability, and superior decisive set performance, Albot stands a sturdy contender against Daniel.
Radu Albot Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Radu Albot
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Radu Albot
78%
(
88 of
113)
1st Serve %
67%
(
65 of
97)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
52 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
97)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Radu Albot
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Radu Albot
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Stefan Adrian Andreescu
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve %
80%
(
76 of
95)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
28%
(
9 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
41 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Radu Albot
72%
(
81 of
112)
1st Serve %
70%
(
92 of
131)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
59 of
92)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
44 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
56 of
131)
124
Total Points Won
119
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
0
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Radu Albot
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Taro Daniel
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
104)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Rybakov
Player
Radu Albot
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Taro Daniel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Taro Daniel
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Taro Daniel
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
23 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
69
|
6-7(8) 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Taro Daniel
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
11
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Mathis Bondaz
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Taro Daniel
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
104)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
Taro Daniel
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
103
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(2) 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Alex Rybakov
56%
(
58 of
103)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
31%
(
32 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(9) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Tyler Zink
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Taro Daniel
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Taro Daniel
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
89 of
128)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
54 of
89)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
26%
(
23 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
128)
116
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (617/485) | Win/Loss | 58% (573/421) |
| 53% (1439/1256) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1316/1033) |
| 51% (13216/12544) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (11470/10587) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1771 | Aces Total | 2467 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 2207 | Total Double Faults | 1994 |
| 1:19:17 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 513.4 | Average Opponent Rank | 483.85 |
| 65% (40705/62605) | 1st Serve % | 63% (35491/56755) |
| 66% (26844/40705) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (24080/35491) |
| 50% (11010/21893) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (10829/21255) |
| 42% (2569/6169) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (2402/5588) |
| 40% (24503/61666) | Return Points Win % | 39% (21978/55972) |
| 56% (575/1025) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (549/934) |
| 49% (33/68) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 27% (13/49) |
| 49% (191/389) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (162/307) |
| 58% (226/390) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (148/297) |
| 84% (577/484) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (590/498) |
| 16% (577/93) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (590/91) |
| 25% (524/131) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (404/72) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
