S. Napolitano
To Win
R. Albot
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L L L L W LForm
L W L W L L W W W LThey have played 3 sets in total, with Albot winning 2 and Ramos-Vinolas winning 1. The last match between Albot and Ramos-Vinolas was at the Girona Challenger, 25-03-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Radu Albot getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Radu Albot | 1 |
Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Girona Challenger(25-03-2025)
Albot | Stats | Ramos-Vinolas |
---|---|---|
21% (4-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 46% (6-7) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
277 | Ranking | 259 |
39 | Highest Rank | 17 |
35 | Age | 37 |
R | Plays | L |
24 | Titles | 16 |
56% (618-487) | Career Total W/L | 55% (685-566) |
$2,954,987 | Career Prize Money | $5,214,434 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
12 May 2025 / Q1 round
12 May 2025 / Q1 round
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
12 May 2025 / Fourth
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
12 May 2025 / Third
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-6 6-3 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Radu Albot
Player
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
0
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
16 | Games Won | 13 |
0 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
5 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
2:24:32 | Average Match Time | 2:24:32 |
64% (58/90) | 1st Serve % | 61% (59/96) |
69% (40/58) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (39/59) |
47% (15/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (15/37) |
56% (5/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (4/11) |
44% (42/96) | Return Points Win % | 39% (35/90) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
When delving into the intriguing world of tennis predictions, one can't ignore the formidable difference in second serve prowess between Ramos-Vinolas and Albot. Over the past six months, Ramos-Vinolas has secured 47.45% of his points on the second serve, outshining Albot who trails with a 41.54% success rate. Such statistics are pivotal in forecasting the potential winner, given their significance in match prediction accuracy.
However, tennis is not merely about wielding a strong serve. Consider the return game statistics of these players. While Albot has demonstrated a commendable ability to snatch 45.95% of points from his opponent's second serve, Ramos-Vinolas is slightly less aggressive, claiming 42.69% in kind. But switch the focus to first serve returns, and Ramos-Vinolas has the edge, grabbing 30.64% compared to Albot's 27.8%. This data is essential for identifying the frontrunner in head-to-head contests.
Under pressure, the game's dynamics shift. Breakpoint resilience is a crucial measure, and here Albot leads slightly by saving 52.86% of breakpoints compared to Ramos-Vinolas’ 50.47%. Such details can sway in-game betting odds, making them a valuable resource for pundits and fans alike. Additionally, over the past year, Ramos-Vinolas has a win rate of 45.1%, while Albot boasts 50.94%. Yet, win rates can be deceptive without context.
If surfaces are the question, then where do these players excel? Ramos-Vinolas revels on clay, dominating 61% of matches here throughout his career. Conversely, Albot is a force on hard courts, matching that 61% success rate. Both players struggle on grass, but Albot's 51% on the green is superior to Ramos-Vinolas' 23%. Surface preferences can be the key to victory.
The level of play and the quality of opponents faced are also worth noting. In the past year, Ramos-Vinolas has competed predominantly in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, achieving a win rate of 51.22%. Albot finds himself with a slightly lower success rate of 47.83% at the same level. Moreover, Ramos-Vinolas faced adversaries with an average rank of 222.61, whereas Albot has engaged with more formidable opponents averaging a rank of 207.28.
Finally, the deciding set statistics might provide the clearest clue yet: Ramos-Vinolas has won 55% of these intense showdowns in the past 12 months, while Albot has slightly outpaced with 57%. Yet, victories hinge not only on critical stats but also on current event performance and break point conversion, where Albot's 32.08% success rate trumps Ramos-Vinolas' 23.86%.
Considering these various metrics and match conditions, while Ramos-Vinolas' clay prowess might give him an edge outdoors, Albot's consistency on hard surfaces and sharper break point conversion could tilt the scale in his favor. Based on the statistics at hand, Albot stands as the likely candidate to emerge victorious.
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Radu Albot
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
11
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Radu Albot
Player
Ignacio Buse
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Petr Brunclik
Player
Radu Albot
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
76
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Radu Albot
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Radu Albot
78%
(
88 of
113)
1st Serve %
67%
(
65 of
97)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
52 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
97)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Radu Albot
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Timofey Skatov
Player
Radu Albot
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Radu Albot
Player
Stefan Adrian Andreescu
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve %
80%
(
76 of
95)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
28%
(
9 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
41 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Timofey Skatov
Player
Radu Albot
72%
(
81 of
112)
1st Serve %
70%
(
92 of
131)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
59 of
92)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
44 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
56 of
131)
124
Total Points Won
119
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Radu Albot
Player
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
0
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Player
Mattia Bellucci
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Player
Titouan Droguet
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
51
Total Points Won
43
|
7-6(5) 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Player
Florent Bax
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Holger Rune
Player
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
81
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Player
Billy Harris
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
66 of
110)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
91
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Radu Albot
Player
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
0
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
56% (618/487) | Win/Loss | 55% (685/566) |
53% (1442/1260) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1603/1435) |
51% (13243/12579) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (14950/14171) |
61% (263/170) | Hard Win/Loss | 40% (80/120) |
54% (227/197) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (575/373) |
52% (99/92) | Indoor Hard W/L | 31% (24/53) |
51% (29/28) | Grass Win/Loss | 23% (6/20) |
0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
1774 | Aces Total | 2828 |
0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
2215 | Total Double Faults | 2205 |
1:19:23 | Average Match Time | 1:22:55 |
161.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 459.17 |
65% (40840/62829) | 1st Serve % | 63% (46000/72968) |
66% (26927/40840) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (31103/46000) |
50% (11052/21982) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (13840/26967) |
42% (2576/6194) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (2915/6982) |
40% (24597/61893) | Return Points Win % | 39% (28655/73530) |
52% (53/49) | Slam W/L | 35% (29/54) |
45% (29/35) | Masters W/L | 50% (85/86) |
63% (15/9) | Cups W/L | 67% (6/3) |
49% (127/133) | Main Tour W/L | 51% (237/231) |
57% (238/182) | Challenger W/L | 65% (225/119) |
67% (155/78) | Futures W/L | 59% (103/72) |
56% (576/1028) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (647/1161) |
49% (33/68) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 37% (30/82) |
49% (192/390) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (192/434) |
58% (226/391) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (233/429) |
84% (579/485) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (647/548) |
16% (579/94) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (647/98) |
25% (525/131) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (604/133) |