Quinn Vandecasteele vs Noah Schachter Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W W L W W L
Form
W L W L W W L L L LH2H: Vandecasteele 1 - 0 Schachter
They have played 2 sets in total, with Vandecasteele winning 2 and Schachter winning 0. The last match between Vandecasteele and Schachter was at the M25 Calabasas, 25-03-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Quinn Vandecasteele getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Quinn Vandecasteele | 1 |
| Noah Schachter | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Calabasas(25-03-2025)
6
3
6
4
| Vandecasteele | Stats | Schachter |
|---|---|---|
| 48% (11-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 52% (12-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 712 | Ranking | 657 |
| 555 | Highest Rank | 654 |
| 22 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 53% (73-65) | Career Total W/L | 54% (121-103) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Paolini VS Ostapenko PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
12 May 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Musetti VS Medvedev PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
13 May 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Vandecasteele VS Schachter H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Quinn Vandecasteele
Player
Noah Schachter
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Vandecasteele VS Schachter H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:22:59 | Average Match Time | 1:22:59 |
| 55% (32/58) | 1st Serve % | 64% (39/61) |
| 66% (21/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (22/39) |
| 54% (14/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (7/22) |
| 38% (5/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
| 52% (32/61) | Return Points Win % | 40% (23/58) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Vandecasteele vs Schachter Match Preview :
In recent months, Schachter's performance on second serves has been notably higher, winning 44.12% of points compared to Vandecasteele's 38.96%. This significant statistic often correlates with predicting match outcomes, indicating a slight edge for Schachter in this area.
Examining return game statistics, Vandecasteele has an advantage on first serve returns with 32.66% of points won, surpassing Schachter's 25.74%. However, Schachter demonstrates a competitive edge on second serve returns, winning 45.87% compared to Vandecasteele's 48.12%. These metrics are instrumental in making predictive analyses of head-to-head matchups.
Under pressure, Schachter's ability to save 56.58% of breakpoints stands out against Vandecasteele's 47.16%. This aspect of play strongly influences in-game betting predictions, as maintaining composure under duress is crucial.
When analyzing their overall performance over the past year, Schachter boasts a win rate of 50.72% (W/L 35/34), whereas Vandecasteele has secured victories in 44.19% of matches (W/L 19/24). This broader overview provides insights into their relative consistency and competitiveness in matches.
Both players exhibit their best win percentages on hard courts; Schachter thrives with 58% (W/L 80/58), and Vandecasteele follows closely at 57% (W/L 56/42). However, on their least favored surfaces, Schachter has struggled on clay with a 49% win rate (W/L 29/30), while Vandecasteele faces more challenges on indoor hard courts, managing only a 39% win rate (W/L 9/14).
Schachter has predominantly participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments over the last year, achieving a win rate of 53.06% (W/L 26/23). In contrast, Vandecasteele frequently competes in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, with a win rate of 39.13% (W/L 9/14). This context is essential to understanding their performance at different competition levels.
Considering their opponent quality, Schachter has faced more challenging opponents with an average rank of 355.84, while Vandecasteele's opponents averaged a rank of 436.98. This disparity could influence their relative match readiness and experience.
In deciding set scenarios, which are pivotal for live betting, Schachter wins 52% of these clutch sets, significantly outperforming Vandecasteele, who wins just 29% of deciding sets played. This statistic underscores Schachter's resilience under high-stakes conditions.
Although their breakpoint conversion rates are closely matched—Schachter at 34.59% and Vandecasteele at 34.81%—the comprehensive comparison of metrics favors Schachter. Based on these analyses, Schachter appears as the player more likely to triumph in their impending encounter.
Quinn Vandecasteele Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Fabrizio Andaloro
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
78%
(
21 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Quinn Vandecasteele
Player
Romain Faucon
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
96)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
84
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Quinn Vandecasteele
Player
Dylan Davies
57%
(
17 of
30)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amit Vales
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve %
77%
(
20 of
26)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
60%
(
9 of
15)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
8 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
24
Total Points Won
23
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Quinn Vandecasteele
Player
Millen Hurrion
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 5-7 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Quinn Vandecasteele
Player
Phoenix Weir
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
103)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
103)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
6-1 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
49%
(
39 of
80)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
49%
(
39 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
45 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Pinnington Jones
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
2
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
39 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quinn Vandecasteele
Player
Noah Schachter
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Noah Schachter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Leonardo Monferrer
Player
Noah Schachter
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve %
63%
(
15 of
24)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
6 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
30
Total Points Won
18
|
6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Noah Schachter
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quinn Vandecasteele
Player
Noah Schachter
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Isaiah Strode
Player
Noah Schachter
50%
(
9 of
18)
1st Serve %
67%
(
10 of
15)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
44%
(
4 of
9)
1st Serve Won
90%
(
9 of
10)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
56%
(
10 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
11
Total Points Won
22
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Noah Schachter
Player
Keshav Chopra
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Schachter
Player
Jack Kennedy
100%
(
12 of
12)
1st Serve %
47%
(
14 of
30)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
100%
(
12 of
12)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
12)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
26
Total Points Won
16
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Thomas George
Player
Noah Schachter
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Schachter
Player
Oren Vasser
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Noah Schachter
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Noah Schachter
Player
Daniel De Jonge
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
11
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (73/65) | Win/Loss | 54% (121/103) |
| 52% (168/153) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (276/234) |
| 52% (1591/1497) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2467/2280) |
| 58% (61/45) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (80/59) |
| 33% (3/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 48% (29/32) |
| 39% (9/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (12/12) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 517 | Aces Total | 654 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 436 | Total Double Faults | 539 |
| 1:16:10 | Average Match Time | 1:12:56 |
| 357.04 | Average Opponent Rank | 334.15 |
| 54% (3835/7117) | 1st Serve % | 60% (6302/10449) |
| 68% (2600/3835) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (4311/6302) |
| 46% (1520/3294) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1959/4147) |
| 42% (345/812) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (423/1047) |
| 43% (3012/7064) | Return Points Win % | 40% (4179/10461) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 37% (14/24) | Challenger W/L | 42% (13/18) |
| 60% (59/40) | Futures W/L | 56% (108/85) |
| 51% (68/133) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (120/222) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 54% (14/26) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (22/38) |
| 46% (22/48) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (28/62) |
| 82% (74/61) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (124/105) |
| 18% (74/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (124/19) |
| 17% (64/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (100/16) |
Vandecasteele vs. Schachter Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
