Quinn Vandecasteele vs Matt Kuhar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Oct at 01:03 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Q. Vandecasteele vs M. Kuhar

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Vandecasteele 1 - 0 Kuhar
They have played 2 sets in total, with Quinn Vandecasteele winning 2 and Matt Kuhar winning 0. The last match between Quinn Vandecasteele and Matt Kuhar was at the Fairfield Challenger, 05-10-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Quinn Vandecasteele getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Vandecasteele | 1 |
| Kuhar | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Fairfield Challenger(10-05-25)
Q. Vandecasteele vs M. Kuhar H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 52.78% (95-85) | Career Total W/L | 55.44% (107-86) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
Q. Vandecasteele vs M. Kuhar Match Preview:
- Matt Kuhar has won 42.52% of his second serve points in the past six months compared to Quinn Vandecasteele's slightly better 46.33%. Could this give Quinn a slight edge in serving consistency?
- On the return side, Matt has outperformed Quinn with 49.86% success on opponents' second serves, compared to Quinn's 46.86%.
- Matt also shows a stronger performance on first serve returns, winning 31.18% of points, overshadowing Quinn's 27.68%.
- Under pressure, Quinn shows remarkable resilience by saving 60.66% of breakpoints, compared to Matt's 43.20%. Does this highlight Quinn's ability to perform better in tight situations?
- In general performance over the past year, Quinn Vandecasteele has won more matches, with a 49.18% win rate, while Matt Kuhar sits at 46.81%.
- Matt Kuhar excels on hard surfaces with a win percentage of 58%, while Quinn achieves his best on grass, also at 58%.
- Both players have participated primarily in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with Quinn achieving a marginally better win rate of 52.50% compared to Matt's 47.50%.
- Quinn has faced slightly tougher competition, as indicated by opponents' average rank of 419.34 against Matt's 426.81.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, both players have an identical win rate of 25% over the last year.
- Current event performance could still sway predictions, depending on each player's condition and form during this particular event.
Editorial Prediction (October 5, 2025, UTC):
The analysis of recent performances hints at a competitive match between Matt Kuhar and Quinn Vandecasteele.
Quinn possesses an edge in second serve efficiency and maintains impressive composure under pressure, suggested by a higher breakpoint save percentage. His overall match record over the last year is also slightly more favorable.
Although Matt Kuhar shows stronger return stats, particularly in first serve returns, Quinn's resilience and recent form position him as a marginal favorite.
Considering these factors, Quinn Vandecasteele emerges as the likely winner of this upcoming tennis match.
Quinn Vandecasteele vs Matt Kuhar Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Q. Vandecasteele vs M. Kuhar H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:3:35 | Average Match Time | 1:3:35 |
| 63% (32/51) | 1st Serve % | 55% (24/44) |
| 72% (23/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (14/24) |
| 74% (14/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (8/20) |
| 100% (4/4) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (22/44) | Return Points Win % | 27% (14/51) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
Q. Vandecasteele Recent Matches Played
M. Kuhar Recent Matches Played

Q. Vandecasteele vs M. Kuhar Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.78% (95/85) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.44% (107/86) |
| 52.40% (218/198) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.17% (240/195) |
| 51.63% (2063/1933) | Games Win/Loss | 52.87% (2126/1895) |
| 57.04% (77/58) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.34% (82/61) |
| 30.00% (3/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 44.44% (8/10) |
| 40.63% (13/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.33% (16/14) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.37 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 720 | Aces Total | 340 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 558 | Total Double Faults | 425 |
| 1:22:41 | Average Match Time | 1:6:23 |
| 386.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 405.19 |
| 54% (5451/10136) | 1st Serve % | 63% (4950/7838) |
| 69% (3745/5451) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (3200/4950) |
| 47% (2213/4697) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1346/2888) |
| 42% (467/1100) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (341/756) |
| 42% (4203/9994) | Return Points Win % | 40% (3201/7935) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43.75% (28/36) | Challenger W/L | 38.46% (5/8) |
| 58.26% (67/48) | Futures W/L | 56.67% (102/78) |
| 51% (89/174) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (105/191) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 51% (20/39) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (17/35) |
| 45% (27/60) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (21/47) |
| 84% (97/81) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (109/99) |
| 16% (97/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (109/10) |
| 16% (83/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (84/8) |