M. Bellucci
To Win
Q. Halys
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W L W L W LForm
L W W L W W W L W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Halys winning 2 and Wild winning 0. The last match between Halys and Wild was at the Miami Open - Miami, 20-03-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Quentin Halys getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Quentin Halys | 1 |
Thiago Seyboth Wild | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Miami Open - Miami(20-03-2025)
Halys | Stats | Wild |
---|---|---|
48% (16-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 36% (9-16) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
47 | Ranking | 120 |
47 | Highest Rank | 58 |
28 | Age | 25 |
R | Plays | R |
12 | Titles | 9 |
56% (423-329) | Career Total W/L | 55% (251-203) |
$2,292,375 | Career Prize Money | $973,785 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
23 Jun 2025 / First
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
Wimbledon - London atp
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Quentin Halys
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
13
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 7 |
13 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
1:15:4 | Average Match Time | 1:15:4 |
56% (35/62) | 1st Serve % | 72% (39/54) |
83% (29/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (28/39) |
56% (15/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (6/15) |
33% (2/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
37% (20/54) | Return Points Win % | 29% (18/62) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
In analyzing the second serve performance over the past six months, Halys has won 48.03% of points on their second serve, compared to Wild's 46.48%. This statistic is significant in forecasting match outcomes, as a better second serve performance often correlates with a higher probability of winning.
When examining return game statistics, Halys stands out by winning 45.03% of opponent's second serve points, while Wild has achieved 41.39% in the same aspect. However, Wild surpasses Halys in first serve returns, succeeding 23.88% of the time over Halys's 18.57%. These figures are crucial in determining the head-to-head (H2H) matchup favorite.
Considering pressure situations, Halys has successfully saved 61.47% of breakpoints faced in recent form, while Wild's breakpoint save percentage is 56.42%. This metric is particularly insightful for in-game betting predictions, highlighting Halys's potential resilience under pressure. Looking at break point conversion, Halys has a conversion rate of 27.27%, whereas Wild converts 29.47% of their chances.
Over the last year, Halys boasts a favorable win/loss record, securing victory in 64.86% of matches played with a breakdown of 48 wins to 26 losses. Wild's performance, on the other hand, reflects a 47.37% win rate, with 27 wins and 30 losses. These statistics contribute to the overall head-to-head prediction, with Halys currently holding the upper hand.
Analyzing surface preferences, Halys's best career win percentage is on indoor hard courts, at 59% (W/L 145/102), while clay presents their worst surface, with a 54% win rate (W/L 110/95). Conversely, Wild excels on clay with a 58% win rate (W/L 200/143) and struggles on indoor hard courts, achieving a 41% win rate (W/L 7/10).
Examining their respective levels of competition, in the past year, Halys has played primarily in Main tour matches, winning 68.97% (W/L 20/9), while Wild has a 56% win rate (W/L 14/11) on the same tour level. This illustrates Halys's stronger performance against a similar level of competition. Importantly, over the last 12 months, Halys has faced opponents with an average rank of 188.16, whereas Wild's opponents are generally ranked higher, at 116.56.
In terms of performing in deciding sets, Halys has a success rate of 62% over the past year, a slight edge over Wild's 56% success rate. This might offer insights for live predictions if the upcoming match goes the distance. As a result, analyzing current event Head-to-Head statistics and past performance, the predictive data seem to indicate that Halys is more likely to emerge triumphant in this matchup.
Halys vs Wild Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Quentin Halys
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
10
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
8 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Quentin Halys
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
83)
18
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Taylor Fritz
Player
Quentin Halys
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
12
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
29 of
34)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
15 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
18 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Quentin Halys
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
101)
10
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
34 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
101)
108
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Holger Rune
Player
Quentin Halys
73%
(
99 of
136)
1st Serve %
57%
(
81 of
143)
8
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
10
79%
(
78 of
99)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
62 of
81)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
31%
(
42 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
55 of
143)
149
Total Points Won
130
|
4-6 6-2 5-7 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Quentin Halys
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
51%
(
76 of
150)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
126)
22
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
1
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
54 of
75)
62%
(
46 of
74)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
32%
(
48 of
150)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
41 of
126)
143
Total Points Won
133
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Machac
Player
Quentin Halys
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
6-7(4) 1-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Quentin Halys
Player
Tomas Machac
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
5
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
11 of
46)
45
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(4) 4-1 ret. | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Hugo Dellien
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Nuno Borges
56%
(
55 of
99)
1st Serve %
65%
(
57 of
88)
9
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Jesper De Jong
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Pierluigi Basile
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Alexander Blockx
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
39%
(
17 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
43 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
104
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
50%
(
36 of
72)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
56% (423/329) | Win/Loss | 55% (251/203) |
56% (1012/809) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (591/481) |
52% (9484/8716) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (5337/4908) |
56% (125/99) | Hard Win/Loss | 47% (33/37) |
53% (114/102) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (206/150) |
59% (161/111) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41% (7/10) |
58% (23/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) |
0.71 | Aces Per Game | 0.38 |
6347 | Aces Total | 1890 |
0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
3213 | Total Double Faults | 1274 |
1:23:2 | Average Match Time | 1:44:32 |
468.04 | Average Opponent Rank | 349.96 |
59% (28332/48332) | 1st Serve % | 61% (19049/31061) |
77% (21953/28332) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (13301/19049) |
48% (9581/20000) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (6120/12012) |
39% (1504/3899) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1213/2961) |
36% (17690/48649) | Return Points Win % | 39% (12173/31191) |
50% (40/40) | Slam W/L | 38% (11/18) |
38% (12/20) | Masters W/L | 60% (18/12) |
100% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 25% (1/3) |
48% (58/62) | Main Tour W/L | 44% (38/48) |
58% (228/165) | Challenger W/L | 57% (130/98) |
67% (84/41) | Futures W/L | 70% (53/23) |
58% (407/701) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (244/433) |
35% (13/37) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 25% (4/16) |
53% (209/397) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (75/154) |
49% (134/272) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (65/144) |
80% (423/339) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (268/222) |
20% (423/84) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (268/46) |
26% (326/86) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (186/29) |