Quentin Halys vs Richard Gasquet Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L W L L L L
Form
W L L W W L W L W LH2H: Halys 1 - 0 Gasquet
They have played 2 sets in total, with Halys winning 2 and Gasquet winning 0. The last match between Halys and Gasquet was at the EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad, 16-07-2024, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Quentin Halys getting the victory 7-6(4) 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Quentin Halys | 1 |
| Richard Gasquet | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad(16-07-2024)
Quentin Halys
Richard Gasquet
7
6
7
6
| Halys | Stats | Gasquet |
|---|---|---|
| 44% (16-20) | YTD Win/Loss | 46% (6-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 52 | Ranking | 182 |
| 46 | Highest Rank | 7 |
| 28 | Age | 39 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 26 |
| 56% (423-332) | Career Total W/L | 62% (783-483) |
| $2,292,375 | Career Prize Money | $13,404,600 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rublev VS Nava PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Waltert VS Teichmann PREDICTION Clay
UniCredit Iasi Open - Iasi wta
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Quentin Halys
Player
Richard Gasquet
46%
(
47 of
102)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
9
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
2
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
53%
(
29 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
35 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
21 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 12 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:0:50 | Average Match Time | 2:0:50 |
| 46% (47/102) | 1st Serve % | 57% (44/77) |
| 81% (38/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (34/44) |
| 53% (29/55) | 2nd Serve Win % | 67% (22/33) |
| 0% (0/3) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/5) |
| 27% (21/77) | Return Points Win % | 34% (35/102) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Quentin Halys Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Quentin Halys
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
51%
(
56 of
109)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
10
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
35 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
109)
114
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
August Holmgren
Player
Quentin Halys
62%
(
66 of
106)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
20
Aces
17
6
Double Faults
7
85%
(
56 of
66)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
42 of
49)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
27 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
20 of
80)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(4) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Quentin Halys
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
10 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Quentin Halys
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
10
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
8 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
83)
18
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Quentin Halys
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
12
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
29 of
34)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
15 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
18 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
101)
10
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
34 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
101)
108
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Quentin Halys
73%
(
99 of
136)
1st Serve %
57%
(
81 of
143)
8
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
10
79%
(
78 of
99)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
62 of
81)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
31%
(
42 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
55 of
143)
149
Total Points Won
130
|
4-6 6-2 5-7 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Richard Gasquet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Richard Gasquet
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
85%
(
46 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
18 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Terence Atmane
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
114)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
114)
114
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Richard Gasquet
53%
(
55 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
48 of
89)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
37%
(
18 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
92
|
7-5 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
48%
(
48 of
99)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
57%
(
29 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Richard Gasquet
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Charles Broom
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
11
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (423/332) | Win/Loss | 62% (783/483) |
| 55% (1013/816) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (1888/1292) |
| 52% (9517/8765) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (16339/14324) |
| 56% (125/100) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (256/168) |
| 53% (114/102) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (251/146) |
| 59% (161/111) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (192/124) |
| 55% (23/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 65% (84/45) |
| 0.71 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
| 6376 | Aces Total | 5583 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 3231 | Total Double Faults | 2544 |
| 1:23:8 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 470.53 | Average Opponent Rank | 447.81 |
| 59% (28451/48559) | 1st Serve % | 61% (48452/79346) |
| 77% (22049/28451) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (35276/48452) |
| 48% (9638/20108) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (16344/30923) |
| 39% (1509/3912) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (3041/7489) |
| 36% (17774/48918) | Return Points Win % | 38% (30616/80572) |
| 49% (40/41) | Slam W/L | 61% (124/79) |
| 38% (12/20) | Masters W/L | 56% (157/122) |
| 100% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 62% (23/14) |
| 48% (58/64) | Main Tour W/L | 63% (357/210) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 17% (1/5) |
| 58% (228/165) | Challenger W/L | 70% (120/52) |
| 67% (84/41) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (407/703) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (647/1034) |
| 34% (13/38) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 61% (133/219) |
| 53% (210/399) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (280/503) |
| 49% (134/273) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (202/356) |
| 80% (423/339) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (747/653) |
| 20% (423/84) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (747/92) |
| 26% (329/86) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (519/130) |
Halys vs. Gasquet Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
