Quentin Halys vs Miomir Kecmanovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W L W L L L
Form
L L L W L L L W W LHead-2-Head: Halys 1 - 0 Kecmanovic
They have played 4 sets in total, with Halys winning 3 and Kecmanovic winning 1. The last match between Halys and Kecmanovic was at the French Open - Paris, 28-05-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Quentin Halys getting the victory 4-6 6-3 7-6(2) 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Quentin Halys | 1 |
| Miomir Kecmanovic | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(28-05-2025)
Quentin Halys
Miomir Kecmanovic
4
6
6
3
7
6
7
5
| Halys | Stats | Kecmanovic |
|---|---|---|
| 46% (16-19) | YTD Win/Loss | 51% (20-19) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 46 | Ranking | 49 |
| 46 | Highest Rank | 27 |
| 28 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 7 |
| 56% (423-331) | Career Total W/L | 56% (315-243) |
| $2,292,375 | Career Prize Money | $5,126,895 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Anisimova VS Swiatek PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
12 Jul 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sinner VS Djokovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Halys VS Kecmanovic H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 7-6(2) 7-5 |
Stats 
Quentin Halys
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
51%
(
76 of
150)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
126)
22
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
1
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
54 of
75)
62%
(
46 of
74)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
32%
(
48 of
150)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
41 of
126)
143
Total Points Won
133
|
||||
Halys VS Kecmanovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 24 | Games Won | 20 |
| 22 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 3:9:0 | Average Match Time | 3:9:0 |
| 51% (76/150) | 1st Serve % | 60% (75/126) |
| 74% (56/76) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (54/75) |
| 62% (46/74) | 2nd Serve Win % | 61% (31/51) |
| 50% (2/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 7% (1/15) |
| 33% (41/126) | Return Points Win % | 32% (48/150) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Halys vs Kecmanovic Match Preview :
- Second serve performance heavily favors Halys, with a slightly higher success rate of 49.21% compared to Kecmanovic's 47.64%. Could this slight edge prove decisive?
- In return games, Kecmanovic takes the lead by winning 48.03% of his opponent's second serve points, while Halys only manages 44.24%.
- When it comes to returning first serves, Kecmanovic again outperforms Halys, winning 24.54% compared to Halys' 20.71%, indicating superior return skills for Kecmanovic.
- Halys shows better resilience under pressure, saving 61.54% of breakpoints faced, while Kecmanovic saves 56.88%.
- Overall match performance over the last year shows Halys with a higher win rate of 63.51%, compared to Kecmanovic's 49.21%.
- Surface preference highlights that Halys performs best on indoor hard courts with a 59% win rate, while Kecmanovic excels on clay with a 60% win rate.
- Both players mostly compete on the Main tour; however, Halys has a higher win rate of 67.74% in these matches compared to Kecmanovic's 50%.
- Halys played against lower-ranked opponents, averaging a ranking of 171.62, whereas Kecmanovic faced tougher competition with an average ranking of 80.7.
- If the match progresses to a deciding set, Halys has historically been stronger, winning 69% of deciding sets over the last year, while Kecmanovic's success rate is only 42%.
- Current event performance and specific event history could significantly impact predictions, so recent form should be considered.
- Regarding break point conversion, Kecmanovic holds an edge, converting 30.81% of opportunities compared to Halys' 26.5%.
Editorial Prediction (May 28, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the statistics for the upcoming match between Halys and Kecmanovic, several key factors emerge. Halys holds a slight edge in second serve success, which could prove important in close situations. His ability to save breakpoints and higher overall match win percentage over the last year suggest a strong mental game and general consistency on court.
Kecmanovic, on the other hand, boasts stronger return game stats and better break point conversion, indicating an aggressive style that could challenge Halys, particularly if Kecmanovic can capitalize on his return opportunities. The difference in opponent quality faced by Kecmanovic may have prepared him for tougher battles as well.
Ultimately, if the match reaches a deciding set, Halys' superiority in critical moments may be a deciding factor. Considering all aspects, while Kecmanovic's return capabilities are impressive, Halys’ recent form and aptitude in pressure situations make him the likely winner of this encounter.
Halys vs Kecmanovic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Quentin Halys Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
August Holmgren
Player
Quentin Halys
62%
(
66 of
106)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
20
Aces
17
6
Double Faults
7
85%
(
56 of
66)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
42 of
49)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
27 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
20 of
80)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(4) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Quentin Halys
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
10 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Quentin Halys
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
10
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
8 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
83)
18
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Quentin Halys
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
12
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
29 of
34)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
15 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
18 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
101)
10
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
34 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
101)
108
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Quentin Halys
73%
(
99 of
136)
1st Serve %
57%
(
81 of
143)
8
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
10
79%
(
78 of
99)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
62 of
81)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
31%
(
42 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
55 of
143)
149
Total Points Won
130
|
4-6 6-2 5-7 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
51%
(
76 of
150)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
126)
22
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
1
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
54 of
75)
62%
(
46 of
74)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
32%
(
48 of
150)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
41 of
126)
143
Total Points Won
133
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Miomir Kecmanovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
16
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Jesper De Jong
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
49%
(
55 of
112)
5
Aces
16
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
26%
(
23 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
112)
110
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Alex Michelsen
67%
(
99 of
147)
1st Serve %
64%
(
96 of
151)
10
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
9
78%
(
77 of
99)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
69 of
96)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
45 of
147)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
52 of
151)
154
Total Points Won
144
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
64%
(
70 of
109)
1st Serve %
68%
(
82 of
121)
8
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
56 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
58 of
82)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
29%
(
32 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
121)
120
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
51%
(
76 of
150)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
126)
22
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
1
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
54 of
75)
62%
(
46 of
74)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
32%
(
48 of
150)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
41 of
126)
143
Total Points Won
133
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Sebastian Baez
55%
(
88 of
160)
1st Serve %
71%
(
130 of
184)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
78 of
130)
53%
(
38 of
72)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
37%
(
10 of
27)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
38%
(
61 of
160)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
83 of
184)
182
Total Points Won
162
|
6-7(3) 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (423/331) | Win/Loss | 56% (315/243) |
| 55% (1012/814) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (755/622) |
| 52% (9503/8747) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (6883/6341) |
| 56% (125/99) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (138/103) |
| 53% (114/102) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (124/82) |
| 59% (161/111) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49% (35/36) |
| 55% (23/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 45% (18/22) |
| 0.71 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 6369 | Aces Total | 2019 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 3223 | Total Double Faults | 1101 |
| 1:23:3 | Average Match Time | 1:40:53 |
| 467.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 325.6 |
| 59% (28411/48461) | 1st Serve % | 61% (24193/39955) |
| 77% (22017/28411) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (16957/24193) |
| 48% (9606/20050) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (8381/15757) |
| 39% (1504/3904) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1545/3777) |
| 36% (17727/48804) | Return Points Win % | 38% (15602/40720) |
| 49% (40/41) | Slam W/L | 52% (32/30) |
| 38% (12/20) | Masters W/L | 41% (35/51) |
| 100% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 55% (6/5) |
| 48% (58/63) | Main Tour W/L | 55% (114/95) |
| 58% (228/165) | Challenger W/L | 62% (58/35) |
| 67% (84/41) | Futures W/L | 73% (69/26) |
| 58% (407/702) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (280/494) |
| 34% (13/38) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 51% (29/57) |
| 53% (209/398) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (111/239) |
| 49% (134/272) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (89/176) |
| 80% (423/339) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (333/271) |
| 20% (423/84) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (333/62) |
| 26% (328/86) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (225/44) |
Halys vs. Kecmanovic Prediction Form Trend:
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
