Qianhui Tang vs Kristen Seabury Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tang vs Seabury analysis and find out who is favored!
Qianhui Tang vs Kristen Seabury Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tang has won 42.02% of points on his second serve, while Seabury has won 14.04%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tang, in recent form, has won 53.42% of his opponent's second serve points, while Seabury has won 31.82%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.5% and 17.86% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tang has saved 50.98% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Seabury has saved 32.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tang has won 47.37% of matches played (W/L 9/ 10), with Seabury winning 0% (W/L 0/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 55/ 53), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 10/ 12). Seabury has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 6% (W/L 1/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Tang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 35.71% of matches (W/L 5/ 9), where as Seabury has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tang winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tang winning 2 and Seabury winning 0. The last match between Tang and Seabury was at the W15 Jakarta, 13-03-2023, Q2 round, Hard with Qianhui Tang getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:36:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tang and Seabury have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tang winning 0 times and Seabury 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tang winning 0, and Seabury 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tang has played against opponents with an average rank of 159.58 while Seabury has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tang has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Seabury has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tang has converted 40.91% of breakpoint opportunities, and Seabury has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tang 1 - 0 Seabury
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
887
Rank
617
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
35
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
50% (69-69)
Career Total W/L
5% (1-19)
0% (0-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Qianhui Tang | Kristen Seabury |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 0 |
Aces (Total) | 6 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 9 |
Avg Match Time | 0:36:0 | 0:36:0 |
1st Serve % | 78% (21/27) | 50% (14/28) |
1st Serve Win% | 95% (20/21) | 21% (3/14) |
2nd Serve Win% | 67% (4/6) | 7% (1/14) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 86% (24/28) | 11% (3/27) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-0 |
Qianhui Tang
Player
Kristen Seabury
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve %
50%
(
14 of
28)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
9
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
3 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
48
Total Points Won
7
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Qianhui Tang | Kristen Seabury |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/5) |
Sets Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) | 0% (0/10) |
Games Win/Loss | 44% (39/49) | 8% (5/57) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/4) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.07 |
Aces Total | 9 | 2 |
DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.97 |
DFs Total | 9 | 29 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 617 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 65% (195/299) | 59% (83/140) |
1st Serve W% | 61% (118/195) | 46% (38/83) |
2nd Serve W% | 43% (45/104) | 14% (8/57) |
BPs Won% Total | 39% (13/33) | 50% (1/2) |
Return Pts W% | 41% (121/292) | 23% (29/128) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/3) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/5) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (5/0) |
Qianhui Tang Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Ayla Aksu
Player
Qianhui Tang
57%
(
55 of
96)
1st Serve %
68%
(
88 of
130)
2
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
3
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
49 of
88)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
36%
(
9 of
25)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
48%
(
46 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
66 of
130)
116
Total Points Won
110
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ena Shibahara
Player
Qianhui Tang
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Qianhui Tang
58%
(
67 of
115)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
42%
(
48 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
108
Total Points Won
107
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Qianhui Tang
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
44 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Fang An Lin
Player
Qianhui Tang
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
38 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 2-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Mia Horvit
Player
Qianhui Tang
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
74%
(
52 of
70)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
45%
(
32 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Unknown Player
Player
Qianhui Tang
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
74%
(
51 of
69)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Qianhui Tang
Player
Chengyiyi Yuan
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
13
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Qianhui Tang
Player
Zijun Jiang
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Kristen Seabury Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Lilitha Sithenkosi Ndungane
Player
Kristen Seabury
57%
(
13 of
23)
1st Serve %
56%
(
15 of
27)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
3 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
38
Total Points Won
12
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Eva Swiderek
Player
Kristen Seabury
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jada Robinson
Player
Kristen Seabury
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve %
58%
(
21 of
36)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
10
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
3 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
50
Total Points Won
13
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Madison Rose
Player
Kristen Seabury
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
66%
(
25 of
38)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H |
view more