Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Qiang Wang vs Olivia Gadecki Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wang vs Gadecki analysis and find out who is favored!
Qiang Wang vs Olivia Gadecki Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wang has won 42.05% of points on his second serve, while Gadecki has won 44.57%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wang, in recent form, has won 48.17% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gadecki has won 56.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.25% and 36.74% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wang has saved 57.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gadecki has saved 56.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wang has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 6/ 3), with Gadecki winning 55.22% (W/L 37/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 303/ 186), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 35/ 36). Gadecki has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 105/ 53), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Wang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 6/ 2), where as Gadecki has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 24/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wang winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Wang winning 2 and Gadecki winning 0. The last match between Wang and Gadecki was at the Adelaide International - Adelaide, 22-02-2021, First, Hard with Qiang Wang getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wang and Gadecki have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wang winning 0 times and Gadecki 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wang winning 0, and Gadecki 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wang has played against opponents with an average rank of 206 while Gadecki has played against players with an average rank of 259.13.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wang has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gadecki has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wang has converted 45.59% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gadecki has converted 43.9% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wang 1 - 0 Gadecki
827
Rank
12
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
163
Rank
120
High
22
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
59% (407-279)
Career Total W/L
64% (156-89)
67% (6-3)
YTD W/L
42% (8-11)
$3,853,637
Career Prize Money
$296,744
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Qiang Wang | Olivia Gadecki |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:0 | 1:21:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (33/54) | 67% (44/66) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 88% (29/33) | 61% (27/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 33% (7/21) | 45% (10/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (29/66) | 33% (18/54) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Qiang Wang
Player
Olivia Gadecki
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Qiang Wang | Olivia Gadecki |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (6/3) | 42% (8/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 68% (13/6) | 45% (19/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (92/74) | 49% (188/197) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 50% (7/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.24 | 0.33 |
| Aces Total | 20 | 62 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0.41 |
| DFs Total | 10 | 77 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:24:27 | 1:30:54 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 206 | 172.11 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (313/508) | 62% (752/1222) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (201/313) | 64% (482/752) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (82/195) | 44% (208/470) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (31/68) | 41% (64/155) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (232/505) | 44% (558/1277) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (5/5) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (6/2) | 43% (3/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (6/9) | 42% (8/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 9% (11/1) |
Qiang Wang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Lanlana Tararudee
Player
Qiang Wang
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Jia-Jing Lu
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Wushuang Zheng
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
En Shuo Liang
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
44
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Han Shi
Player
Qiang Wang
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
75 of
120)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
45 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
59 of
120)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Lanlana Tararudee
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
46%
(
39 of
85)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Shutong Qu
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xiyu Wang
Player
Qiang Wang
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Qiang Wang
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Olivia Gadecki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Greetje Minnen
Player
Olivia Gadecki
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
7
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Olivia Gadecki
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
38%
(
8 of
21)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
39 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
51 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Eleni Christofi
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
Player
Olivia Gadecki
61%
(
81 of
133)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
105)
8
Aces
4
11
Double Faults
11
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
44%
(
23 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
43%
(
57 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
122
Total Points Won
116
|
4-6 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikola Bartunkova
Player
Olivia Gadecki
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
3
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaqueline Cristian
Player
Olivia Gadecki
49%
(
43 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
10
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Usue Maitane Arconada
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Dalma Galfi
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
83
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Olivia Gadecki
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Olivia Gadecki
44%
(
33 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
7
Aces
4
11
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Wang Vs Gadecki Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Qiang Wang
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
