Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Qiang Wang vs Mizuno Kijima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wang vs Kijima analysis and find out who is favored!
Qiang Wang vs Mizuno Kijima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wang has won 41.75% of points on his second serve, while Kijima has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wang, in recent form, has won 48.39% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kijima has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 45.28% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wang has saved 54.05% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kijima has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wang has won 50% of matches played (W/L 2/ 2), with Kijima winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 299/ 185), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 35/ 36). Kijima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 97/ 84), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Wang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 2/ 1), where as Kijima has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wang winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Wang winning 2 and Kijima winning 0. The last match between Wang and Kijima was at the Guangzhou International Women's Open - Guangzhou, 19-09-2015, Q1 round, Hard with Qiang Wang getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:6:42.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wang and Kijima have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wang winning 0 times and Kijima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wang winning 0, and Kijima 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wang has played against opponents with an average rank of 32.5 while Kijima has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wang has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kijima has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wang has converted 47.37% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kijima has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wang 1 - 0 Kijima
806
Rank
12
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
485
High
28
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
59% (403-278)
Career Total W/L
52% (107-100)
50% (2-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,853,637
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Qiang Wang | Mizuno Kijima |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:6:42 | 1:6:42 |
| 1st Serve % | 45% (21/47) | 56% (28/50) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 90% (19/21) | 50% (14/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (12/26) | 23% (5/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 62% (31/50) | 34% (16/47) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Qiang Wang
Player
Mizuno Kijima
45%
(
21 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Qiang Wang | Mizuno Kijima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (42/40) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 8 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 7 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:32 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 32.5 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (173/276) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (106/173) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (43/103) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (18/38) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (132/283) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Qiang Wang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Han Shi
Player
Qiang Wang
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
75 of
120)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
45 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
59 of
120)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Lanlana Tararudee
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
46%
(
39 of
85)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Shutong Qu
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xiyu Wang
Player
Qiang Wang
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Qiang Wang
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Qiang Wang
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Yanina Wickmayer
80%
(
88 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
51%
(
45 of
88)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
52%
(
57 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Qiang Wang
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
50%
(
39 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
47 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Liv Hovde
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Qiang Wang
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mizuno Kijima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Haruka Kaji
Player
Mizuno Kijima
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve %
48%
(
63 of
131)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
15
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
66 of
131)
123
Total Points Won
106
|
6-3 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sunam Jeong
Player
Mizuno Kijima
69%
(
70 of
102)
1st Serve %
57%
(
56 of
99)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(0) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mizuno Kijima
Player
Ji-Hee Choi
48%
(
46 of
95)
1st Serve %
68%
(
74 of
109)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mizuno Kijima
Player
Suzy Larkin
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
10
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mizuno Kijima
Player
You-Na Sul
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
9
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patcharin Cheapchadej
Player
Mizuno Kijima
61%
(
68 of
112)
1st Serve %
64%
(
67 of
105)
2
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
8
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
43%
(
48 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
113
Total Points Won
104
|
5-7 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yujin Ahn
Player
Mizuno Kijima
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
8
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
93
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mizuno Kijima
Player
Sung Hee Kim
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
16 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kotomi Takahata
Player
Mizuno Kijima
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tingting Pei
Player
Mizuno Kijima
44%
(
32 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Wang Vs Kijima Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Qiang Wang
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
