Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Priska Madelyn Nugroho vs Annick Melgers Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nugroho vs Melgers analysis and find out who is favored!
Priska Madelyn Nugroho vs Annick Melgers Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nugroho has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Melgers has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nugroho, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Melgers has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nugroho has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Melgers has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nugroho has won 50% of matches played (W/L 5/ 5), with Melgers winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nugroho has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 58/ 30), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Melgers has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 8/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Nugroho has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 5/ 5), where as Melgers has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nugroho winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nugroho winning 2 and Melgers winning 0. The last match between Nugroho and Melgers was at the W15 Vejle, 28-07-2021, First, Clay with Priska Madelyn Nugroho getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:54:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nugroho and Melgers have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nugroho winning 0 times and Melgers 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nugroho winning 0, and Melgers 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nugroho has played against opponents with an average rank of 222.7 while Melgers has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nugroho has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Melgers has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nugroho has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Melgers has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nugroho 1 - 0 Melgers
899
Rank
265
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
64% (71-40)
Career Total W/L
44% (54-70)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Priska Madelyn Nugroho | Annick Melgers |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:0 | 1:54:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (49/75) | 54% (41/76) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 55% (27/49) | 51% (21/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (15/26) | 31% (11/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 58% (7/12) | 33% (4/12) |
| Return Points W% | 58% (44/76) | 44% (33/75) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats 
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
Player
Annick Melgers
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
44 of
76)
86
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Priska Madelyn Nugroho | Annick Melgers |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Priska Madelyn Nugroho Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Polina Iatcenko
Player
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
46%
(
29 of
63)
0
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
Player
Lisa-Marie Rioux
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Kovaleva
Player
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
59%
(
55 of
94)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
4
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
47%
(
44 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yi Tsen Cho
Player
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dabin Kim
Player
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
50%
(
30 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
Player
Gio Jang
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
41%
(
20 of
49)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
Player
Heewon Kil
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
58%
(
21 of
36)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
21%
(
7 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
52
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesca Jones
Player
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
64%
(
7 of
11)
1st Serve %
75%
(
6 of
8)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
5 of
7)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
12
Total Points Won
7
|
3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
Player
Sofia Sewing
49%
(
43 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
60 of
86)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
34%
(
15 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
47%
(
41 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
Player
Noelia Bouzo Zanotti
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Annick Melgers Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tereza Dejnozkova
Player
Annick Melgers
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chiraz Bechri
Player
Annick Melgers
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
25%
(
3 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
51%
(
26 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Annick Melgers
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
Player
Annick Melgers
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
44 of
76)
86
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Annick Melgers
Player
Bente Spee
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alba Rey Garcia
Player
Annick Melgers
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
14 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
49
Total Points Won
43
|
7-6(1) ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Annick Melgers
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
29 of
62)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicole Fossa Huergo
Player
Annick Melgers
62%
(
63 of
102)
1st Serve %
48%
(
46 of
96)
-
Aces
-
11
Double Faults
6
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(6) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Nugroho Vs Melgers Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
