Presley Thieneman vs J Mercer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Thieneman vs Mercer analysis and find out who is favored!
Presley Thieneman vs J Mercer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Thieneman has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Mercer has won 47.62%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Thieneman, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mercer has won 38.46%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Thieneman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mercer has saved 66.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Thieneman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Mercer winning 57.14% (W/L 4/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Thieneman has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3). Mercer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 5/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Thieneman winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Thieneman winning 2 and Mercer winning 0. The last match between Thieneman and Mercer was at the M15 South Bend, 21-06-2022, Q3, Hard with Presley Thieneman getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Thieneman and Mercer have played a deciding set 0 times, with Thieneman winning 0 times and Mercer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Thieneman winning 0, and Mercer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Thieneman has played against opponents with an average rank of while Mercer has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Thieneman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mercer has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Thieneman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mercer has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Thieneman 1 - 0 Mercer
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
50% (4-4)
Career Total W/L
44% (12-15)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Presley Thieneman | J Mercer |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Presley Thieneman | J Mercer |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Presley Thieneman Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Murphy Cassone
Player
Presley Thieneman
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Presley Thieneman
Player
Diego Marin
43%
(
18 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Siphosothando Montsi
Player
Presley Thieneman
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
54
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Perry Gregg
Player
Presley Thieneman
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 7-6(2) | H2H |
view more
J Mercer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Luc Fomba
Player
J Mercer
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
14
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 4-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Daniel Milavsky
Player
J Mercer
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
4-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jaden Weekes
Player
J Mercer
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
J Mercer
Player
Gabrielius Guzauskas
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
62
Total Points Won
61
|
2-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
J Mercer
Player
Yanael Lundqvist
43%
(
19 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Patrick Fletchall
Player
J Mercer
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
11
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more