Pol Wattanakul vs Jacob Bradshaw Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wattanakul vs Bradshaw analysis and find out who is favored!
Pol Wattanakul vs Jacob Bradshaw Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wattanakul has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Bradshaw has won 52.24%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wattanakul, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bradshaw has won 50.82%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 33.14% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wattanakul has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bradshaw has saved 61.16% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wattanakul has won 59.09% of matches played (W/L 13/ 9), with Bradshaw winning 53.52% (W/L 38/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wattanakul has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 5/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5). Bradshaw has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 101/ 63), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Wattanakul has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.09% of matches (W/L 13/ 9), where as Bradshaw has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.38% of matches (W/L 35/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wattanakul winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Wattanakul winning 0 and Bradshaw winning 2. The last match between Wattanakul and Bradshaw was at the M15 Nakhon Si Thammarat, 01-06-2023, Second, Hard with Jacob Bradshaw getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:49:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wattanakul and Bradshaw have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wattanakul winning 0 times and Bradshaw 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wattanakul winning 0, and Bradshaw 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wattanakul has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Bradshaw has played against players with an average rank of 157.17.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wattanakul has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bradshaw has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wattanakul has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bradshaw has converted 51.35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wattanakul 0 - 1 Bradshaw
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
631
Rank
598
High
28
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
554
Rank
554
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
45% (112-139)
Career Total W/L
60% (105-70)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
57% (13-10)
$2,420
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Wattanakul VS Bradshaw H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Pol Wattanakul | Jacob Bradshaw |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 10 | 14 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 6 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1:49:0 | 1:49:0 |
1st Serve % | 45% (29/64) | 68% (49/72) |
1st Serve Win% | 72% (21/29) | 76% (37/49) |
2nd Serve Win% | 54% (19/35) | 61% (14/23) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 20% (1/5) | 60% (3/5) |
Return Points W% | 29% (21/72) | 38% (24/64) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Wattanakul VS Bradshaw H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 7-5 |
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Pol Wattanakul
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
64)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Pol Wattanakul | Jacob Bradshaw |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (13/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (29/22) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (260/232) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 59% (13/9) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.44 |
Aces Total | 0 | 106 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.24 |
DFs Total | 0 | 58 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:53:49 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 188.17 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 59% (947/1597) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 69% (653/947) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 53% (343/650) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 51% (66/130) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (603/1529) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (12/5) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 59% (13/22) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/10) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 86% (14/12) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 14% (14/2) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 11% (9/1) |
Pol Wattanakul Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Maximus Jones
Player
Pol Wattanakul
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
82)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
11
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pol Wattanakul
Player
Kody Pearson
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
2
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
7
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Thanapet Chanta
Player
Pol Wattanakul
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
65%
(
73 of
112)
2
Aces
17
1
Double Faults
11
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
56 of
73)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 7-6(3) 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Chukang Wang
Player
Pol Wattanakul
72%
(
67 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
0
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
7
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Pol Wattanakul
Player
Tao Mu
51%
(
58 of
114)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
8
Aces
6
13
Double Faults
3
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
47 of
62)
48%
(
27 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
42 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
104
Total Points Won
111
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pol Wattanakul
Player
Jimmy Yang
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jeremy Jin
Player
Pol Wattanakul
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
47%
(
36 of
77)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
43 of
77)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Pol Wattanakul
Player
He Ziheng
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
52
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Jacob Bradshaw Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Louis Dussin
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
50%
(
53 of
106)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
21 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(7) 7-6(5) 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
F |
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Edas Butvilas
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
83%
(
19 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Martin Klizan
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
41%
(
18 of
44)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Aleksandre Bakshi
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
8
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
28 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
79
|
5-7 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Matthew William Donald
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
30%
(
9 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
74%
(
68 of
92)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ioannis Xilas
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
73%
(
65 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
109)
0
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
109)
101
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
66%
(
61 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
56 of
98)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
27 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
105
Total Points Won
85
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Aristotelis Thanos
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
42%
(
22 of
52)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Mihai Alexandru Coman
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
9
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H |
view more