Pol Martin Tiffon vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W W W L W L L L L L
Form
W W W L L W L W L LHead To Head: Tiffon 0 - 1 Wong
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tiffon winning 0 and Wong winning 2. The last match between Tiffon and Wong was at the Wimbledon - London, 23-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Pol Martin Tiffon | 0 |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Wimbledon - London(23-06-2025)
Tiffon | Stats | Wong |
---|---|---|
48% (13-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (15-19) |
0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
207 | Ranking | 175 |
197 | Highest Rank | 128 |
25 | Age | 21 |
R | Plays | - |
12 | Titles | 2 |
62% (322-195) | Career Total W/L | 55% (147-119) |
$48,575 | Career Prize Money | $266,710 |
0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Karatancheva VS Gao PREDICTION Hard
Prague Open - Prague wta
19 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
Boisson VS Yastremska PREDICTION Clay
European Open - Hamburg wta
19 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
10
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
0 | Sets Won | 2 |
7 | Games Won | 12 |
6 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
1:19:0 | Average Match Time | 1:19:0 |
60% (44/73) | 1st Serve % | 60% (38/63) |
64% (28/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (28/38) |
48% (14/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 68% (17/25) |
0% (0/1) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (2/7) |
29% (18/63) | Return Points Win % | 42% (31/73) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tiffon vs Wong Match Preview :
- On second serve performance, Wong has a slight lead, winning 49.18% of points compared to Tiffon's 44.23% in recent months. This advantage could play a key role in the match's outcome.
- In return games, Tiffon excels with a higher win percentage on both opponents’ first and second serves, at 29.73% and 47.79%, respectively, compared to Wong's 22.64% and 41.99%.
- Who performs better under pressure? Although both save breakpoints with close efficiency, Wong slightly edges out with a 54.55% save rate over Tiffon's 53.59%.
- Over the past year, Tiffon has displayed a superior win-loss record at 70%, while Wong has only managed a 53.25% win rate, suggesting a better overall performance by Tiffon.
- Considering surface preference, Tiffon performs best on clay with a 63% win rate, whereas Wong is strongest on hard courts with a 59% success rate.
- Tiffon's matches have primarily been in lower-tier events, boasting an 85.11% win rate, while Wong has faced tougher competition in higher-level events with a 57.14% win rate.
- When assessing opponent quality, Wong has faced competitors with an average ranking of about 233.3, which is higher than the 350.84 average faced by Tiffon, indicating greater challenge exposure.
- In deciding sets, Wong demonstrates resilience, winning 61% of such matches, slightly outperforming Tiffon's 56% success rate.
- Tiffon is more adept at converting breakpoints, achieving a 36.97% conversion rate compared to Wong's 29.41%, which could be pivotal during critical moments in a match.
Editorial Prediction (June 23, 2025, UTC):
As we assess the upcoming tennis match, several key performance indicators stand out. Tiffon excels in return games and break point conversions, indicating strategic advantages that could turn the tide in close games.
Conversely, Wong showcases a stronger second serve performance and has faced higher-ranked opponents more frequently. This experience against tougher competition may provide Wong with an edge in handling high-pressure situations.
While both players have their distinct strengths, Tiffon's higher win percentage over the last year and effective return statistics suggest a slightly stronger position to secure a victory in this matchup.
Based on the analysis, Tiffon seems to have the upper hand and is likely to win this encounter, although Wong's competitive experience could pose significant challenges.
Tiffon vs Wong Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Pol Martin Tiffon Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
3
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
10
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
96%
(
27 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
25%
(
4 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
49
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 2-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Marin Cilic
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Moise Kouame
64%
(
72 of
113)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
84)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
47 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
84)
98
Total Points Won
99
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Lukas Neumayer
56%
(
56 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
66 of
97)
4
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
2
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
101
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
69%
(
72 of
104)
1st Serve %
67%
(
97 of
145)
10
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
66 of
97)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
29 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
55 of
145)
130
Total Points Won
119
|
6-7(7) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
2
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
1
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(1) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
10
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Gigante
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
103)
2
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
30 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
6-1 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Constant Lestienne
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Henry Searle
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Otto Virtanen
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
94%
(
31 of
33)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Zachary Svajda
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
10
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
24 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
62% (322/195) | Win/Loss | 55% (147/119) |
61% (718/465) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (331/289) |
54% (5867/4931) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (3059/2940) |
59% (24/17) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (115/80) |
63% (296/172) | Clay Win/Loss | 47% (20/23) |
29% (2/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43% (6/8) |
0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 43% (6/8) |
0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.49 |
1113 | Aces Total | 1427 |
0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
1499 | Total Double Faults | 538 |
1:24:9 | Average Match Time | 1:30:42 |
450.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 371.22 |
58% (16654/28666) | 1st Serve % | 60% (10051/16633) |
69% (11512/16654) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (7100/10051) |
50% (5982/12011) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3207/6582) |
44% (1492/3417) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (624/1544) |
42% (12526/29550) | Return Points Win % | 38% (6423/16705) |
33% (1/2) | Slam W/L | 33% (3/6) |
0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 44% (4/5) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 63% (5/3) |
25% (1/3) | Main Tour W/L | 33% (3/6) |
44% (41/52) | Challenger W/L | 55% (60/50) |
67% (279/137) | Futures W/L | 60% (72/49) |
63% (319/506) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (142/261) |
33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
51% (59/115) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (48/89) |
53% (81/154) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (48/87) |
88% (326/288) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (138/120) |
12% (326/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (138/18) |
18% (191/35) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (128/26) |
Tiffon vs. Wong Prediction Form Trend:

Other Predictions
- Loading news...