Plamen Milushev vs Niels Visker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Milushev vs Visker analysis and find out who is favored!
Plamen Milushev vs Niels Visker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Milushev has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Visker has won 53.04%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Milushev, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Visker has won 47.89%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.76% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Milushev has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Visker has saved 69.61% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Milushev has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 6/ 3), with Visker winning 65% (W/L 52/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Milushev has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 68/ 45), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 11/ 12). Visker has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 43/ 20), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 64/ 40).
- Player level: In the last year, Milushev has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 6/ 3), where as Visker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.94% of matches (W/L 50/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Milushev has played against opponents with an average rank of 54 while Visker has played against players with an average rank of 138.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Milushev has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Visker has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Milushev has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Visker has converted 40.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Milushev 0 - 0 Visker
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
592
Rank
592
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
58% (79-57)
Career Total W/L
64% (114-64)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
71% (20-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
w/o |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Plamen Milushev | Niels Visker |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (20/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (41/20) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (318/275) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 73% (8/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 75% (6/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/3) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.76 |
Aces Total | 0 | 220 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.25 |
DFs Total | 0 | 73 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:29:42 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 115.57 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (1203/1904) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 76% (912/1203) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 51% (357/700) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 43% (62/144) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (658/1812) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (20/8) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (19/27) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 91% (10/11) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/6) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 91% (22/20) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 9% (22/2) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (6/0) |
Plamen Milushev Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Damien Wenger
Player
Plamen Milushev
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Plamen Milushev
Player
Jasza Szajrych
57%
(
55 of
97)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
104)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
6
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
98
Total Points Won
103
|
3-6 7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Plamen Milushev
Player
Maxwell Benson
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Hynek Barton
Player
Plamen Milushev
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
11
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Plamen Milushev
Player
Andrea Meduri
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
36 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
70
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 7-6(8) 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 4-6 6-1 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Niels Visker Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Liam Gavrielides
Player
Niels Visker
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
99)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
9
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
43 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
112
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Niels Visker
Player
Pavel Verbin
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
75%
(
69 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Niels Visker
Player
Jasza Szajrych
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
F |
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Niels Visker
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Niels Visker
Player
Eero Vasa
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Niels Visker
Player
Deney Wassermann
50%
(
16 of
32)
1st Serve %
58%
(
15 of
26)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
10 of
16)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
30
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Niels Visker
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Niels Visker
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Niels Visker
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Niels Visker
Player
Daniel Khazime
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
14 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H |
view more