Pirmin Haenle vs Vlademyros Mavropoulos-Stoliarenko Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Haenle vs Mavropoulos-Stoliarenko analysis and find out who is favored!
Pirmin Haenle vs Vlademyros Mavropoulos-Stoliarenko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Haenle has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Mavropoulos-Stoliarenko has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Haenle, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mavropoulos-Stoliarenko has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Haenle has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mavropoulos-Stoliarenko has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Haenle has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Mavropoulos-Stoliarenko winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Haenle has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 28/ 41), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 98/ 146). Mavropoulos-Stoliarenko has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 32% (W/L 23/ 49), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Haenle has played against opponents with an average rank of while Mavropoulos-Stoliarenko has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Haenle has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mavropoulos-Stoliarenko has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Haenle has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mavropoulos-Stoliarenko has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Haenle 0 - 0 Mavropoulos-Stoliarenko
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
661
High
35
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
36
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
41% (191-277)
Career Total W/L
28% (38-99)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Haenle VS Mavropoulos-Stoliarenko H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Pirmin Haenle | Vlademyros Mavropoulos-Stoliarenko |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Pirmin Haenle Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Dane Propoggia
Player
Pirmin Haenle
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Brydan Klein
Player
Pirmin Haenle
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pirmin Haenle
Player
Ruikai Wang
59%
(
73 of
123)
1st Serve %
50%
(
56 of
112)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
75%
(
55 of
73)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
50%
(
25 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
43 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
48 of
112)
128
Total Points Won
107
|
6-2 6-7(4) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tejas Chaukulkar
Player
Pirmin Haenle
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Prajnesh Gunneswaran
Player
Pirmin Haenle
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
QF |
Prajnesh Gunneswaran
Player
Pirmin Haenle
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve %
39%
(
27 of
69)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
9
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
65
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Pirmin Haenle
Player
Suraj R Prabodh
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pirmin Haenle
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
N. Vijay Sundar Prashanth
Player
Pirmin Haenle
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
10
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
7
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
41 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
98)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pirmin Haenle
Player
Mateusz Terczynski
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
1
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Vlademyros Mavropoulos-Stoliarenko Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
QF | 7-6(3) 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
Q2 | 4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 1-6 6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more