Piet Luis Pinter vs Saba George Nanobashvili Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W L W L L
Form
W L W L W W L L W LH2H: Pinter 1 - 0 Nanobashvili
They have played 1 sets in total, with Pinter winning 1 and Nanobashvili winning 0. The last match between Pinter and Nanobashvili was at the M15 Antalya, 19-02-2025, Q2 round, Clay with Piet Luis Pinter getting the victory 6-3 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Piet Luis Pinter | 1 |
| Saba George Nanobashvili | 0 |
M15 Antalya(19-02-2025)
| Pinter | Stats | Nanobashvili |
|---|---|---|
| 61% (11-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (3-3) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | ||
| 19 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 57% (26-20) | Career Total W/L | 49% (27-28) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cerundolo VS Dimitrov PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Paolini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
27 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Pinter VS Nanobashvili H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 ret. | |||||
Pinter VS Nanobashvili H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 6 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Piet Luis Pinter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-7(4) 6-4 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats 
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Piet Luis Pinter
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Piet Luis Pinter
Player
Gokberk Saritas
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
63 of
89)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
51 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
68
|
6-0 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Saba George Nanobashvili Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-3 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alessandro Battiston
Player
Saba George Nanobashvili
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 1-6 7-5 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-7(3) 6-2 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 4-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (26/20) | Win/Loss | 49% (27/28) |
| 53% (55/48) | Sets Win/Loss | 49% (60/63) |
| 53% (525/468) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (589/611) |
| 0% (0/0) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (16/11) |
| 57% (26/20) | Clay Win/Loss | 36% (8/14) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (3/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 23 | Aces Total | 56 |
| 0.05 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 22 | Total Double Faults | 144 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 164.04 | Average Opponent Rank | 138.27 |
| 62% (485/788) | 1st Serve % | 59% (1253/2137) |
| 60% (293/485) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (768/1253) |
| 43% (131/303) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (379/884) |
| 47% (31/66) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (98/196) |
| 38% (306/798) | Return Points Win % | 42% (835/1965) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (26/20) | Futures W/L | 49% (27/28) |
| 56% (25/45) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (27/54) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 17% (1/6) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (6/12) |
| 67% (8/12) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (8/14) |
| 85% (27/23) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (27/22) |
| 15% (27/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (27/5) |
| 16% (19/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (28/5) |
See recent tennis photos of Pinter and Nanobashvili
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
