Pierre-Ludovic Duclos vs Ji Sung Nam Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Duclos vs Nam analysis and find out who is favored!
Pierre-Ludovic Duclos vs Ji Sung Nam Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Duclos has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Nam has won 46.28%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Duclos, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nam has won 53.52%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.92% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Duclos has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nam has saved 57.02% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Duclos has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Nam winning 45.16% (W/L 14/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Duclos has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 12/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 38/ 43). Nam has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 229/ 168), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Duclos winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Duclos winning 2 and Nam winning 0. The last match between Duclos and Nam was at the Shanghai Challenger, 05-09-2011, Q1 round, Hard with Pierre-Ludovic Duclos getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Duclos and Nam have played a deciding set 0 times, with Duclos winning 0 times and Nam 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Duclos winning 0, and Nam 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Duclos has played against opponents with an average rank of while Nam has played against players with an average rank of 315.42.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Duclos has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nam has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Duclos has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nam has converted 37.72% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Duclos 1 - 0 Nam
4
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
Ret.
Rank
229
High
38
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
708
Rank
236
High
30
Age
R
Plays
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
54% (261-220)
Career Total W/L
56% (276-213)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
33% (2-4)
$31,600
Career Prize Money
$1,445
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Pierre-Ludovic Duclos | Ji Sung Nam |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 5 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-3 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Pierre-Ludovic Duclos | Ji Sung Nam |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 31% (4/9) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 43% (55/72) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.13 |
Aces Total | 0 | 8 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.41 |
DFs Total | 0 | 25 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:43:45 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 175.17 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (233/390) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (155/233) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (70/157) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 33% (15/46) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (171/441) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/6) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Pierre-Ludovic Duclos Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Hans Podlipnik-Castillo
Player
Pierre-Ludovic Duclos
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Pierre-Ludovic Duclos
Player
Franko Skugor
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
David Rice
Player
Pierre-Ludovic Duclos
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
92)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Pierre-Ludovic Duclos
Player
Sean Thornley
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Lewis Burton
Player
Pierre-Ludovic Duclos
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
14 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Pierre-Ludovic Duclos
Player
Onur Kargin
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Pierre-Ludovic Duclos
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
7
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Pierre-Ludovic Duclos
Player
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
67%
(
76 of
113)
1st Serve %
54%
(
66 of
122)
7
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
36%
(
41 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
51 of
122)
123
Total Points Won
112
|
5-7 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Flavio Cipolla
Player
Pierre-Ludovic Duclos
77%
(
63 of
82)
1st Serve %
45%
(
40 of
88)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
14 of
48)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
48 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Ji Sung Nam Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Ji Sung Nam
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Otto Virtanen
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Philip Sekulic
Player
Ji Sung Nam
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Takuya Kumasaka
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
65%
(
79 of
122)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
53 of
122)
112
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alex Bolt
Player
Ji Sung Nam
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Ji Sung Nam
57%
(
76 of
134)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
104)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
50%
(
29 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
43%
(
57 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
121
Total Points Won
117
|
7-6(6) 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Calum Puttergill
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
63
|
4-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Fajing Sun
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
87 of
134)
1st Serve %
66%
(
92 of
139)
5
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
62 of
92)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
55 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
61 of
139)
140
Total Points Won
133
|
6-7(5) 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more