Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Pierre-Hugues Herbert vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Herbert vs Zandschulp analysis and find out who is favored!
Pierre-Hugues Herbert vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Herbert has won 49.37% of points on his second serve, while Zandschulp has won 49.66%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Herbert, in recent form, has won 49.11% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zandschulp has won 50.19%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.88% and 28.92% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Herbert has saved 63.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zandschulp has saved 61.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Herbert has won 59.02% of matches played (W/L 36/ 25), with Zandschulp winning 45.1% (W/L 23/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Herbert has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 184/ 113), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 108/ 98). Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Herbert has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.04% of matches (W/L 29/ 17), where as Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 42.31% of matches (W/L 11/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Herbert winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Herbert winning 2 and Zandschulp winning 0. The last match between Herbert and Zandschulp was at the ABN AMRO World Tennis Tournament - Rotterdam, 12-02-2017, Q3, I.hard with Pierre-Hugues Herbert getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:40:43.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Herbert and Zandschulp have played a deciding set 0 times, with Herbert winning 0 times and Zandschulp 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Herbert winning 1, and Zandschulp 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Herbert has played against opponents with an average rank of 283.75 while Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 152.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Herbert has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zandschulp has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Herbert has converted 40.35% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zandschulp has converted 36.69% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Herbert 1 - 0 Zandschulp
148
Rank
36
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
89
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
57% (454-340)
Career Total W/L
63% (326-193)
68% (17-8)
YTD W/L
33% (6-12)
$2,722,826
Career Prize Money
$2,830,210
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Herbert VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Pierre-Hugues Herbert | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:43 | 1:40:43 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (42/74) | 59% (55/94) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (34/42) | 71% (39/55) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (18/32) | 41% (16/39) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 8% (1/12) | 0% (0/3) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (39/94) | 30% (22/74) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Herbert VS Zandschulp H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-4 |
Stats 
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
91
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Pierre-Hugues Herbert | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 68% (17/8) | 33% (6/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (38/24) | 33% (13/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (336/302) | 45% (177/218) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 36% (4/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 75% (12/4) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.61 | 0.46 |
| Aces Total | 190 | 87 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 106 | 52 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:39 | 1:43:24 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 336.48 | 166.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1238/2022) | 64% (800/1251) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (919/1238) | 68% (544/800) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (385/784) | 47% (213/451) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (72/167) | 35% (33/93) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (776/2026) | 36% (431/1211) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 36% (4/7) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (15/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 68% (17/25) | 38% (6/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (10/15) | 50% (5/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (8/12) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (17/14) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 18% (17/3) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (8/3) | 8% (12/1) |
Pierre-Hugues Herbert Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Oriol Roca Batalla
Player
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
9
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
74%
(
78 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
107)
107
Total Points Won
106
|
5-7 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Corentin Moutet
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Arthur Gea
70%
(
62 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
9
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
44 of
70)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
22 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
102)
102
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Francesco Maestrelli
55%
(
59 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
86)
5
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
8
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
38%
(
18 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
48 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Raul Brancaccio
58%
(
60 of
103)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
13
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
92)
104
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
47%
(
25 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
4
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Antoine Escoffier
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
102
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Yuta Shimizu
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
11
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joris De Loore
Player
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
4
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
23 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Federico Coria
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Rinky Hijikata
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
view more
Herbert Vs Zandschulp Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
