Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Pia Konig vs Melis Sezer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Konig vs Sezer analysis and find out who is favored!
Pia Konig vs Melis Sezer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Konig has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Sezer has won 49.5%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Konig, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sezer has won 49.49%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 37.74% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Konig has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sezer has saved 57.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Konig has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Sezer winning 60% (W/L 9/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Konig has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 168/ 130), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Sezer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 226/ 138), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Konig winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Konig winning 0 and Sezer winning 2. The last match between Konig and Sezer was at the Istanbul, 07-04-2018, Q1 round, Hard with Melis Sezer getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:36:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Konig and Sezer have played a deciding set 0 times, with Konig winning 0 times and Sezer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Konig winning 0, and Sezer 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Konig has played against opponents with an average rank of while Sezer has played against players with an average rank of 192.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Konig has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sezer has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Konig has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sezer has converted 46% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Konig 0 - 1 Sezer
Ret.
Rank
306
High
30
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
873
Rank
336
High
30
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
54% (239-201)
Career Total W/L
55% (352-284)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
67% (4-2)
$860
Career Prize Money
$1,020
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Pia Konig | Melis Sezer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 10 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:0 | 1:36:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (49/74) | 82% (63/77) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 53% (26/49) | 57% (36/63) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (12/25) | 57% (8/14) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 50% (5/10) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (33/77) | 49% (36/74) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Melis Sezer
Player
Pia Konig
82%
(
63 of
77)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Pia Konig | Melis Sezer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 62% (8/5) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (72/59) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 5 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 13 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:32:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 323.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (226/365) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 58% (131/226) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (70/139) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 55% (17/31) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (139/317) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Pia Konig Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Pia Konig
75%
(
80 of
107)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
55%
(
44 of
80)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
7 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
47%
(
50 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
104
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Pia Konig
Player
Anastasia Pribylova
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pia Konig
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
100%
(
55 of
55)
1st Serve %
96%
(
64 of
67)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucie Hradecka
Player
Pia Konig
44%
(
23 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Pia Konig
Player
Csilla Argyelan
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pia Konig
Player
Sofia Madina
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve %
44%
(
25 of
57)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Akgul Amanmuradova
Player
Pia Konig
74%
(
68 of
92)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Irina Ramialison
Player
Pia Konig
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pia Konig
Player
Nina Alibalic
71%
(
10 of
14)
1st Serve %
100%
(
5 of
5)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
70%
(
7 of
10)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
13
Total Points Won
6
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Melis Sezer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ilay Yoruk
Player
Melis Sezer
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Melis Sezer
Player
Jana Stojanova
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Melis Sezer
Player
Monika Wojcik
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Ayla Aksu
Player
Melis Sezer
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
26%
(
6 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Melis Sezer
Player
Tamara Curovic
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eva Garkusha
Player
Melis Sezer
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Melis Sezer
Player
Alana Tuayeva
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
9
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Melis Sezer
Player
Tijana Sretenovic
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
62
|
2-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Konig Vs Sezer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
