Philipp Pavlenko vs Eric Padgham Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pavlenko vs Padgham analysis and find out who is favored!
Philipp Pavlenko vs Eric Padgham Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pavlenko has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Padgham has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pavlenko, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Padgham has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pavlenko has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Padgham has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pavlenko has won 38.46% of matches played (W/L 5/ 8), with Padgham winning 44.44% (W/L 4/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pavlenko has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 32/ 31), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2). Padgham has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 6/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 11/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Pavlenko has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 38.46% of matches (W/L 5/ 8), where as Padgham has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 4/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pavlenko winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Pavlenko winning 2 and Padgham winning 1. The last match between Pavlenko and Padgham was at the M15 Antalya, 20-03-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Philipp Pavlenko getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pavlenko and Padgham have played a deciding set 1 times, with Pavlenko winning 1 times and Padgham 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Pavlenko winning 0, and Padgham 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pavlenko has played against opponents with an average rank of 88.85 while Padgham has played against players with an average rank of 190.44.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pavlenko has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Padgham has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pavlenko has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Padgham has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Pavlenko 1 - 0 Padgham
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
51% (34-33)
Career Total W/L
52% (17-16)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Philipp Pavlenko | Eric Padgham |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 16 | 17 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0-6 6-3 10-8 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Philipp Pavlenko | Eric Padgham |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Philipp Pavlenko Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Tim Ruehl
Player
Philipp Pavlenko
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
48%
(
43 of
90)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
78
|
6-0 6-7(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Philipp Pavlenko
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
92%
(
12 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Philipp Pavlenko
Player
Ruben Hartig
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 3-6 10-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Philipp Pavlenko
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
76%
(
42 of
55)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Philipp Pavlenko
Player
Andrea Fiorentini
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
49%
(
34 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Andrea Fiorentini
Player
Philipp Pavlenko
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
49%
(
48 of
97)
0
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
3
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(4) 7-6(4) 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Philipp Pavlenko
Player
Tanguy Genier
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H |
view more
Eric Padgham Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Krittin Koaykul
Player
Eric Padgham
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Congsup Congcar
Player
Eric Padgham
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
41%
(
24 of
58)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
8
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
51
|
3-6 6-1 10-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Gunawan Trismuwantara
Player
Eric Padgham
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Markos Kalovelonis
Player
Eric Padgham
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
6
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
7
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
91%
(
39 of
43)
76%
(
26 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
21 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
19 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(3) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
Eric Padgham
Player
Taj Hibbert
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Eric Padgham
Player
Mason Naumovski
52%
(
44 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
11
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 6-7(5) 10-8 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Markos Kalovelonis
Player
Eric Padgham
59%
(
65 of
110)
1st Serve %
47%
(
49 of
105)
15
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
14
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
39 of
49)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
30%
(
33 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
37 of
105)
114
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(2) 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Eric Padgham
Player
Ying-Ze Chen
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
41 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
18 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Eric Padgham
Player
Muhammad Hidayatul Rezky Djufri
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
51%
(
18 of
35)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
55
Total Points Won
21
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(2) 3-6 10-3 | H2H |
view more