Y. Kusuhara
To Win
P. Hjorth
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L W W L W LForm
L W L W W W L W W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Hjorth winning 0 and Poljicak winning 2. The last match between Hjorth and Poljicak was at the M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio, 19-02-2025, First, Hard with Mili Poljicak getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Philip Hjorth | 0 |
Mili Poljicak | 1 |
M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio(19-02-2025)
- / First
Miami Open - Miami atp
24 Mar 2025 / Third
Miami Open - Miami wta
24 Mar 2025 / Fourth
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-1 |
![]() ![]()
Mili Poljicak
Player
Philip Hjorth
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Prediction insights for the upcoming tennis match:
In terms of second serve performance in recent form, Hjorth has exhibited an impressive accomplishment by winning 50.56% of points on their second serve, while Poljicak has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 48.66%. It is worth mentioning that there exists a profound correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
An examination of the return game statistics in recent form highlights that Hjorth has notably excelled by winning 54.52% of their opponent's second serve points. In contrast, Poljicak has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 50.4%. Moreover, the figures become even more intriguing when observing the statistics for first serve returns, with Hjorth acquiring a 33.51% success rate and Poljicak with a slightly lower percentage of 32.23%. These statistics hold a strong correlation in determining the favored contender in their forthcoming head-to-head matchup.
Turning our attention to the analysis of how players perform under pressure, it is evident that Hjorth has efficiently managed to save 47% of breakpoints in recent form. Conversely, Poljicak has demonstrated an even more impressive ability, saving 62.67% of breakpoints. This particular statistic proves to be of great significance when making in-game betting predictions.
Considering the performance overview of the past year, Hjorth has achieved victory in 53.57% of matches played (with a Win/Loss record of 30/26), whereas Poljicak has attained an outstanding success rate of 72.94% (with a Win/Loss record of 62/23). These statistics provide us with a comprehensive overview for predicting the head-to-head outcome.
When analyzing the players' preferred surfaces, it is evident that Hjorth has experienced the most triumph on the Hard surface, with a winning percentage of 61% (Win/Loss: 38/24). Conversely, their performance on I.hard has been less impressive, achieving a meager winning percentage of 29% (Win/Loss: 2/5). Similarly, Poljicak excels on the Hard surface, with a winning percentage of 61% (Win/Loss: 27/17), yet their performance on Grass has been considerably weaker, failing to secure a single victory (Win/Loss: 0/1).
Examining the level at which the players participate, Hjorth has predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a $10K prize, achieving success in 54.55% of matches (Win/Loss: 30/25). In contrast, Poljicak has predominantly engaged in similar tournaments, with an exceptional winning rate of 80.3% (Win/Loss: 53/13). Therefore, comparing the statistics between players to predict the favorite ultimately rests on the relative event level in which they have participated.
Considering the quality of opponents faced, it is evident that over the past twelve months, Hjorth has encountered opponents with an average rank of 305.32. On the other hand, Poljicak has faced players with a higher average rank of 428.51.
In terms of deciding set performance against all players, if this particular match progresses to a deciding set, Hjorth has secured victory in 23% of such sets over the past year. Conversely, Poljicak has exhibited remarkable success in deciding sets, prevailing in 67% of all matches played on tour.
While evaluating past player performance offers valuable insights into predicting tennis matches, considering the current event statistics becomes equally significant for indicating in-form players. Therefore, it is recommendable to refer to the section below (eventStats) for an up-to-date analysis if they have already partaken in a match within the ongoing event. Furthermore, it is worth acknowledging that certain players may exhibit superior performances at specific events, thus necessitating the consideration of this factor when predicting the outcome.
Another noteworthy aspect to consider is break point conversion. In recent form, Hjorth has capitalized on 42.22% of breakpoint opportunities, whereas Poljicak has demonstrated a slightly lower conversion rate of 40.44% when attempting to break their opponents' serve. This statistical trend proves to be highly useful for providing in-game betting tips whenever either player finds themselves in a breakpoint situation.
If you are interested in employing models that facilitate tennis match predictions, this article serves as an excellent starting point (Warning: intended for stats enthusiasts).
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Kuan-Yi Lee
Player
Philip Hjorth
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
46 of
81)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Philip Hjorth
Player
Yuta Tomida
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Curras Abasolo
Player
Philip Hjorth
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
71
|
1-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Philip Hjorth
Player
Andres Fernandez Canovas
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mili Poljicak
Player
Philip Hjorth
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Philip Hjorth
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
9
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Philip Hjorth
Player
Mariano Dedura-Palomero
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Naoya Honda
Player
Philip Hjorth
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
48
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Mili Poljicak
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Mili Poljicak
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
53%
(
45 of
85)
1st Serve %
75%
(
83 of
110)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
70%
(
28 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
110)
110
Total Points Won
85
|
6-0 6-7(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mili Poljicak
Player
Marko Topo
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
67 of
105)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
44 of
67)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
105)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Nerman Fatic
Player
Mili Poljicak
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Mili Poljicak
Player
Mirza Basic
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
81
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Mili Poljicak
Player
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
78%
(
62 of
79)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mili Poljicak
Player
Josip Simundza
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
53%
(
52 of
98)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
36%
(
35 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tiago Pereira
Player
Mili Poljicak
54%
(
64 of
118)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
104)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
42%
(
49 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
109
Total Points Won
113
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mili Poljicak
Player
Pedro Araujo
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ryan Peniston
Player
Mili Poljicak
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
47 of
84)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
47 of
84)
98
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more
View full predicted draw for Hjorth