Philip Henning vs Denis Yevseyev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W L W W L L
Form
L W L L W W L L L LHead-to-head: Henning 0 - 1 Yevseyev
They have played 2 sets in total, with Henning winning 0 and Yevseyev winning 2. The last match between Henning and Yevseyev was at the Glasgow Challenger, 20-02-2025, Second, I.hard with Denis Yevseyev getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
Glasgow Challenger(20-02-2025)
6
2
6
3
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Philip Henning
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
0
Sets Won
2
5
Games Won
12
2
Aces (Total)
9
0
Total Double Faults
2
1:4:34
Average Match Time
1:4:34
54% (26/48)
1st Serve %
68% (40/59)
62% (16/26)
1st Serve Win %
85% (34/40)
41% (9/22)
2nd Serve Win %
37% (7/19)
0% (0/4)
Break Points Won % (Total)
75% (3/4)
31% (18/59)
Return Points Win %
48% (23/48)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Philip Henning vs Denis Yevseyev Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Philip Henning 0 - 1 Denis Yevseyev
In the realm of the tennis court, a captivating spectacle is about to unfold. Let us delve into the realms of predictions and revelations regarding the impending match.
Behold the enigma of second serve performance, an aspect that holds great significance in the art of fortune-telling. We observe that in the past six months, Henning has emerged victorious in 58.24% of points on their second serve, while Yevseyev has triumphed in 49.62%. Pay heed, for there exists a profound correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of predicting match outcomes.
Now, turn your gaze towards the ethereal realm of return game stats, where the true essence of this encounter lies. In recent times, Henning has displayed prowess by emerging victorious in 59.65% of their opponent's second serve points, while Yevseyev boasts a respectable 51.2%. In this mystical field, the same can be said for first serve returns, with Henning and Yevseyev conquering 36.6% and 32.28% respectively. These numbers hold great power in determining the favorite in this epic battle between the two.
Let us not forget the profound analysis of pressure, an indispensable factor in every tennis match. Henning, in their recent exploits, has valiantly saved 59.8% of breakpoints, while Yevseyev has showcased a commendable 57.03% resilience. Such statistics, my dear friends, provide invaluable insights for those seeking to engage in in-game betting predictions.
Venturing further into the abyss of performance overview, a tale emerges. Over the past year, Henning has emerged victorious in a staggering 77.78% of matches played, accumulating a glorious record of 56 wins and 16 losses. Conversely, Yevseyev, while still commendable, has achieved a respectable 44.29%, embracing victories in 31 battles but succumbing to defeat in 39 skirmishes. Such information bestows upon us a comprehensive picture of the head-to-head prediction panorama.
Now, let us delve into the labyrinthine depths of surface preferences. Henning, in their illustrious career, has excelled on the Hard, triumphing in an astonishing 81% of encounters, with 70 wins and a mere 16 losses. In contrast, their journey on Clay has proven to be more arduous, capturing victory in 63% of battles, with 12 glorious triumphs and 7 regrettably humiliating defeats. Yevseyev, too, has their own unique preferences, with the Hard being their forte, claiming victory in 55% of contests, accounting for 220 wins and 178 losses. However, the Grass provides a more challenging terrain, where their win percentage rests at 50%, with only 2 wins and 2 losses. Such revelations unravel the intricacies of their prowess on different surfaces.
Ah, the existential question of player level beckons us. In the past year, Henning has showcased their skills in a multitude of matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, particularly the $10K ones. In this realm, they have emerged triumphant in an astounding 86.44% of encounters, with 51 victorious conquests and a mere 8 defeats. In contrast, Yevseyev has sought glory in the Challengers/ITF tournaments of a higher magnitude, surpassing their opponents in 42.22% of clashes. Their record stands at 19 glorious triumphs and 26 lamentable losses. When comparing these statistics, we must acknowledge the contextual nature of the event level at which they have competed.
Behold, the grand tapestry of opponent quality is unraveled before us. In the past 12 months, Henning has clashed against adversaries bearing an average rank of 424.74, while Yevseyev has been pitted against opponents boasting an average rank of 260.13. Such information weaves a tale of the impediments they have faced on their journey to greatness.
But what of the deciding set? When the tides of fate push these warriors to their limits, who shall emerge victorious? Henning, in the past 12 months, has conquered the trials of the deciding set in 47% of their encounters, while Yevseyev possesses a commendable 42% success rate. These figures grant us insights into the potential outcome when the match reaches its pivotal moment.
Ah, the present event statistics, an indicator of the players' current form. While past performances reveal much, the current event should also be considered. Alas, if they have previously played a match in the ongoing event, we must examine the section below for a glimpse into their current prowess. For some players, certain events bring forth their true potential, and this should not be overlooked when foretelling the outcome.
Lastly, let us unmask the enigma of break point conversion. In recent times, Henning has seized the moment by converting 52.06% of their breakpoint opportunities. Conversely, Yevseyev has demonstrated their own finesse, converting 45.49% of chances to dismantle their opponents' serve. These alluring statistics present invaluable tips for those interested in in-game live betting.
Thus, we conclude this mystical journey through the realm of predictions and revelations regarding the upcoming tennis match. May these insights guide you as you embark upon the adventure that awaits on the courts.
Philip Henning Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Philip Henning
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve %
74%
(
29 of
39)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Philip Henning
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Lilian Marmousez
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Kaito Uesugi
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
1
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Philip Henning
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
100)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Luca Preda
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
2-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Philip Henning
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Gauthier Onclin
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Philip Henning
76%
(
62 of
82)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
94)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Denis Yevseyev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Denis Yevseyev
68%
(
72 of
106)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
99)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
43 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
107
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Denis Yevseyev
61%
(
63 of
103)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
7
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
0
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
36 of
46)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
46 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rei Sakamoto
Player
Denis Yevseyev
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
8 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
51
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Rincon
Player
Denis Yevseyev
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Philip Henning
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Harry Wendelken
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Denis Yevseyev
63%
(
74 of
117)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
43 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
109)
116
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(1) 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Denis Yevseyev
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Denis Yevseyev
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
75% (91/30)
Win/Loss
54% (455/390)
72% (195/74)
Sets Win/Loss
53% (1045/922)
59% (1439/980)
Games Win/Loss
51% (9263/8855)
81% (70/16)
Hard Win/Loss
55% (220/178)
63% (12/7)
Clay Win/Loss
54% (148/126)
56% (9/7)
Indoor Hard W/L
50% (85/84)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
50% (2/2)
0.29
Aces Per Game
0.16
340
Aces Total
1392
0.1
Double Faults Per Game
0.18
124
Total Double Faults
1579
1:25:57
Average Match Time
1:6:44
399.31
Average Opponent Rank
532.05
66% (4343/6543)
1st Serve %
66% (28272/42859)
71% (3076/4343)
1st Serve Win %
64% (18040/28272)
57% (1262/2200)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (6986/14587)
47% (394/844)
Break Points Won % (Total)
45% (2202/4896)
44% (3152/7184)
Return Points Win %
43% (18510/43473)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
43% (3/4)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
50% (2/2)
20% (1/4)
Cups W/L
100% (1/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
38% (9/15)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
44% (8/10)
Challenger W/L
49% (168/174)
84% (82/16)
Futures W/L
58% (272/195)
75% (91/121)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
54% (448/825)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
18% (2/11)
60% (18/30)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
55% (104/190)
52% (14/27)
Deciding Set Win %
52% (143/275)
93% (88/82)
1st Set Won, Won Match
83% (454/377)
7% (88/6)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
17% (454/77)
27% (33/9)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
20% (391/77)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
