Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Philip Florig vs Xiaofei Wang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Florig vs Wang analysis and find out who is favored!
Philip Florig vs Xiaofei Wang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Florig has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Wang has won 20%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Florig, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wang has won 50%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Florig has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wang has saved 33.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Florig has won 46.43% of matches played (W/L 13/ 15), with Wang winning 44.44% (W/L 12/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Florig has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 24/ 27), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11). Wang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 61/ 47).
- Player level: In the last year, Florig has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.17% of matches (W/L 13/ 11), where as Wang has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 10/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Florig winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Florig winning 2 and Wang winning 0. The last match between Florig and Wang was at the M15 Monastir, 20-05-2022, Quarterfinals, Hard with Philip Florig getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:13:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Florig and Wang have played a deciding set 0 times, with Florig winning 0 times and Wang 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Florig winning 0, and Wang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Florig has played against opponents with an average rank of 178.25 while Wang has played against players with an average rank of 177.11.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Florig has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wang has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Florig has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wang has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Florig 1 - 0 Wang
851
Rank
842
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
796
Rank
694
High
21
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
42% (40-55)
Career Total W/L
57% (64-49)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Philip Florig | Xiaofei Wang |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:13:0 | 1:13:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (35/55) | 54% (27/50) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (26/35) | 59% (16/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (9/20) | 48% (11/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (23/50) | 36% (20/55) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Philip Florig
Player
Xiaofei Wang
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Philip Florig | Xiaofei Wang |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Philip Florig Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yanis Ghazouani Durand
Player
Philip Florig
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
14 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
49
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henrique Rocha
Player
Philip Florig
44%
(
19 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
47%
(
20 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
52
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(6) ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Philip Florig
48%
(
48 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
71 of
112)
4
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
7
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
47%
(
25 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
6-2 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dominik Boehler
Player
Philip Florig
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Florig
Player
John Hallquist Lithen
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
2
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Philip Florig
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Philip Florig
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
20
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
39 of
47)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
17 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Florig
Player
Arthur Nagel
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Florig
Player
Mariano Dedura-Palomero
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
19 of
32)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
Player
Philip Florig
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Xiaofei Wang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Lavizzari
Player
Xiaofei Wang
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve %
57%
(
13 of
23)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
10 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
32
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Xiaofei Wang
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
41%
(
19 of
46)
11
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
17 of
19)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zhe Li
Player
Xiaofei Wang
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Xiaofei Wang
Player
Hanwen Li
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
42%
(
22 of
53)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arjun Kadhe
Player
Xiaofei Wang
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
8
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
47 of
65)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
30 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
96)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Xiaofei Wang
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Xiaofei Wang
Player
Jiayang Dong
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aoran Wang
Player
Xiaofei Wang
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
9
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
96%
(
25 of
26)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
2 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xiaofei Wang
Player
Alexander Zgirovsky
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Florig Vs Wang Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
