Peyton Stearns vs Amanda Anisimova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W W W W L
Form
L W W L W L L W W LHead-To-Head: Stearns 1 - 0 Anisimova
They have played 3 sets in total, with Stearns winning 2 and Anisimova winning 1. The last match between Stearns and Anisimova was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 25-04-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Peyton Stearns getting the victory 6-2 2-6 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Peyton Stearns | 1 |
| Amanda Anisimova | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(25-04-2025)
Peyton Stearns
Amanda Anisimova
6
2
2
6
7
5
| Stearns | Stats | Anisimova |
|---|---|---|
| 57% (16-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (16-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 28 | Ranking | 16 |
| 28 | Highest Rank | 16 |
| 23 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 4 |
| 60% (174-118) | Career Total W/L | 62% (177-107) |
| $1,522,399 | Career Prize Money | $4,798,865 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Reales VS Wang PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Basilashvili VS Vacherot PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 2-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Peyton Stearns
Player
Amanda Anisimova
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
6
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
8
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
48%
(
47 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 13 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 2:15:28 | Average Match Time | 2:15:28 |
| 61% (59/97) | 1st Serve % | 58% (57/99) |
| 61% (36/59) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (31/57) |
| 37% (14/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (17/42) |
| 39% (7/18) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (6/14) |
| 52% (51/99) | Return Points Win % | 48% (47/97) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Stearns vs Anisimova Match Preview :
Analyzing the second serve performance over the last six months reveals that Amanda Anisimova has a slight edge by winning 39.83% of her points compared to Peyton Stearns' 39.72%. This subtle difference can be crucial for match outcomes and predictions. Indeed, this correlation underscores the minor yet potentially pivotal advantage that Anisimova holds in this aspect of their game.
Examining return game statistics, it becomes evident that Stearns surpasses Anisimova in returning her opponent's second serve points, registering a remarkable 51.97% against Anisimova's 47.22%. Conversely, when evaluating first-serve returns, Anisimova leads with 33.41%, slightly ahead of Stearns' 32.06%. These figures can greatly influence who is favored in head-to-head matches.
Considering pressure situations, Stearns has demonstrated superior breakpoint resilience in recent form, saving 51.64% of breakpoints faced, compared to Anisimova's 50.79%. This statistic is especially valuable for predicting critical moments in matches. Additionally, Anisimova has converted 32.33% of her breakpoint opportunities, whereas Stearns has managed to convert a higher percentage at 38.89%. Such metrics are invaluable for in-game betting scenarios.
In terms of overall match performance over the past year, Anisimova boasts a higher win percentage, ahead with 66.67% (W/L 30/15) compared to Stearns' 57.41% (W/L 31/23). This head-to-head comparison provides a comprehensive overview of their recent exploits on the court.
Assessing their favored playing surfaces reveals that Anisimova commands a substantial win percentage on clay courts, achieving 65% (W/L 51/27), while her weakest surface is indoor hard courts at 50% (W/L 2/2). On the other hand, Stearns excels on indoor hard courts with a 68% win rate (W/L 15/7) and struggles more on grass, with a win percentage of 33% (W/L 2/4).
Regarding competition level, Anisimova has predominantly competed on the Masters series over the past year, winning 72.73% of her encounters (W/L 16/6), whereas Stearns has primarily participated in the Main tour, securing 56.52% (W/L 13/10). Evaluating these statistics relative to event level is essential when forecasting favorites in a match.
Opponent quality offers another perspective; Anisimova has faced adversaries with an average rank of 68.78 over the last 12 months, compared to Stearns' opponents, averaging a rank of 108.24. This statistic indicates that Anisimova has generally competed against more highly-ranked competitors.
Regarding deciding sets, Stearns has a notable advantage, having triumphed in 61% of her deciding sets in matches over the past year, while Anisimova has only won 43%. This factor could play a crucial role should the match extend to a decisive set.
Based on the meticulous examination of these statistics, Stearns appears to be favored in this matchup due to her superior breakpoint conversion and deciding set performance, coupled with a strong return game. However, Anisimova's consistency against higher-ranked players and overall winning percentage cannot be ignored, suggesting a closely fought encounter ahead.
Stearns vs Anisimova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Peyton Stearns Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Peyton Stearns
84%
(
58 of
69)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Elina Svitolina
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
52%
(
53 of
101)
0
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
47%
(
49 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
101)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Naomi Osaka
60%
(
63 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
6
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
39 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
26 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Madison Keys
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
102)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Anna Kalinskaya
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Nuria Brancaccio
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Peyton Stearns
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Rebeka Masarova
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Amanda Anisimova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Amanda Anisimova
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
52
Total Points Won
56
|
3-6 6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Petra Martic
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Yuliia Starodubtseva
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Amanda Anisimova
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
104)
5
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
11
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
48%
(
39 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
55 of
104)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Amanda Anisimova
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
6
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
8
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
48%
(
47 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Emma Navarro
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
48%
(
42 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sofia Kenin
Player
Amanda Anisimova
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve %
54%
(
14 of
26)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
27
Total Points Won
19
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Yulia Putintseva
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (174/118) | Win/Loss | 62% (177/107) |
| 58% (395/284) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (409/252) |
| 54% (3431/2895) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (3272/2708) |
| 57% (100/74) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (109/66) |
| 63% (57/33) | Clay Win/Loss | 64% (53/30) |
| 68% (15/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) |
| 33% (2/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 59% (13/9) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 470 | Aces Total | 591 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.37 |
| 1006 | Total Double Faults | 1071 |
| 1:32:53 | Average Match Time | 1:27:33 |
| 320.33 | Average Opponent Rank | 260.96 |
| 66% (12374/18762) | 1st Serve % | 65% (12425/19247) |
| 62% (7684/12374) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (7869/12425) |
| 46% (2939/6387) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3244/6822) |
| 49% (1125/2292) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1162/2440) |
| 46% (8394/18179) | Return Points Win % | 46% (8714/19071) |
| 47% (9/10) | Slam W/L | 58% (32/23) |
| 55% (28/23) | Masters W/L | 57% (51/39) |
| 51% (24/23) | Main Tour W/L | 64% (56/31) |
| 64% (100/56) | Challenger W/L | 73% (38/14) |
| 68% (13/6) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (172/289) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (175/277) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 45% (36/80) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (28/52) |
| 50% (47/94) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (42/95) |
| 86% (176/151) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (186/153) |
| 14% (176/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (186/31) |
| 20% (116/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (98/25) |
Stearns vs. Anisimova Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
