Petra Martic vs Sara Errani Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W L W W W L
Form
L L L W L L L L W LH2H: Martic 0 - 1 Errani
They have played 2 sets in total, with Martic winning 0 and Errani winning 2. The last match between Martic and Errani was at the Banka Koper Slovenia Open - Portoroz, 24-07-2009, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Hard, with Sara Errani getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Petra Martic | 0 |
| Sara Errani | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Banka Koper Slovenia Open - Portoroz(24-07-2009)
Sara Errani
Petra Martic
6
1
6
1
| Martic | Stats | Errani |
|---|---|---|
| 52% (14-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 25% (3-9) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 144 | Ranking | 290 |
| 14 | Highest Rank | 5 |
| 34 | Age | 38 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 16 |
| 57% (448-344) | Career Total W/L | 57% (650-490) |
| $5,937,490 | Career Prize Money | $7,709,160 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Wu VS Schoolkate PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
16 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Buse VS Djere PREDICTION Clay
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
14 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Sara Errani
Player
Petra Martic
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 2 | Games Won | 12 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 64% (25/39) | 1st Serve % | 83% (38/46) |
| 44% (11/25) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (25/38) |
| 21% (3/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4/8) |
| 50% (1/2) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (6/8) |
| 37% (17/46) | Return Points Win % | 64% (25/39) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Petra Martic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Diane Parry
Player
Petra Martic
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
9
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Petra Martic
Player
Panna Udvardy
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Petra Martic
Player
Selena Janicijevic
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
8
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Petra Martic
Player
Maddison Inglis
59%
(
69 of
116)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
11
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
46 of
59)
57%
(
27 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
40 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
27 of
87)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Petra Martic
74%
(
78 of
106)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
45 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Martic
Player
Margaux Rouvroy
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carole Monnet
Player
Petra Martic
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
62 of
98)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
45%
(
42 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Petra Martic
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sara Errani Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Sara Errani
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
88%
(
73 of
83)
4
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
3
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 6-0 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Errani
Player
Jule Niemeier
81%
(
70 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
11
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
91
|
0-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Sara Errani
46%
(
22 of
48)
1st Serve %
82%
(
53 of
65)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Sara Errani
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Sara Errani
64%
(
76 of
119)
1st Serve %
83%
(
99 of
120)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
57 of
99)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
48 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
50 of
120)
121
Total Points Won
118
|
7-5 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Sara Errani
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
75%
(
43 of
57)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Errani
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
1
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
88
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Sara Errani
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
79%
(
72 of
91)
10
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (448/344) | Win/Loss | 57% (650/490) |
| 54% (1010/844) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (1444/1161) |
| 52% (9056/8433) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (12376/11391) |
| 52% (175/161) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (239/201) |
| 62% (179/109) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (347/208) |
| 54% (52/44) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47% (40/46) |
| 58% (42/30) | Grass Win/Loss | 41% (24/35) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 2424 | Aces Total | 202 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 2325 | Total Double Faults | 2020 |
| 1:12:57 | Average Match Time | 1:9:35 |
| 417.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 436.28 |
| 61% (27713/45659) | 1st Serve % | 78% (52437/67609) |
| 66% (18410/27713) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (29112/52437) |
| 47% (8469/17946) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (6459/15169) |
| 45% (2264/5081) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (4843/9569) |
| 42% (19633/46388) | Return Points Win % | 49% (33145/67719) |
| 57% (82/63) | Slam W/L | 56% (83/66) |
| 49% (72/74) | Masters W/L | 47% (97/111) |
| 56% (9/7) | Cups W/L | 50% (16/16) |
| 55% (164/132) | Main Tour W/L | 60% (292/197) |
| 64% (114/64) | Challenger W/L | 61% (157/100) |
| 64% (7/4) | Futures W/L | 100% (5/0) |
| 57% (444/780) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (635/1122) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 83% (5/6) |
| 53% (110/206) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (136/245) |
| 59% (162/275) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (178/335) |
| 87% (407/355) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (633/550) |
| 12% (407/50) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (633/83) |
| 24% (385/94) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (505/95) |
Martic vs. Errani Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
