Petra Marcinko vs Joanna Garland Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L W W W L
Form
W L W W W W L W W LHead-2-Head: Marcinko 0 - 1 Garland
They have played 2 sets in total, with Marcinko winning 0 and Garland winning 2. The last match between Marcinko and Garland was at the French Open - Paris, 22-05-2025, Round: Q2 round, Surface: Clay, with Joanna Garland getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Petra Marcinko | 0 |
| Joanna Garland | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(22-05-2025)
Joanna Garland
Petra Marcinko
6
3
6
4
| Marcinko | Stats | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| 61% (23-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 75% (33-11) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 177 | Ranking | 144 |
| 132 | Highest Rank | 144 |
| 19 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 16 |
| 64% (124-69) | Career Total W/L | 69% (262-119) |
| $226,470 | Career Prize Money | $121,985 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 3 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sonego VS Zverev PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fearnley VS Moutet PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Joanna Garland
Player
Petra Marcinko
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 7 | Games Won | 12 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:38:0 | Average Match Time | 1:38:0 |
| 53% (41/77) | 1st Serve % | 64% (50/78) |
| 61% (25/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (32/50) |
| 33% (12/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (15/28) |
| 33% (3/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (5/13) |
| 40% (31/78) | Return Points Win % | 52% (40/77) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Marcinko vs Garland Match Preview :
- On second serve points, Marcinko edges Garland with a 38.88% success rate compared to Garland's 37.48%. Does this give Marcinko an advantage? Probably in close-point scenarios.
- Marcinko demonstrates superior return performance on opponents' second serves, winning 52.98% of points, while Garland manages 44.46%.
- On first serve returns, Garland slightly outperforms Marcinko at 31.45% compared to Marcinko's 29.56%.
- When under pressure, Garland has a marginal advantage, saving 48.78% of breakpoints compared to Marcinko's 44.06%.
- Over the past year, Garland boasts a more impressive match-winning rate at 81.18%, whereas Marcinko holds a 60.32% win rate.
- Marcinko excels on Indoor hard surfaces with a 67% win rate, while Garland shines on Hard surfaces, achieving a 71% win rate.
- Garland has dominated recent tournaments, winning 83.58% of matches at Challenger/ITF tournaments, whereas Marcinko has won 57.89% in similar events.
- Marcinko faces higher-ranked opponents with an average ranking of 303.48, compared to Garland's opponents who average a 410.26 ranking.
- In deciding sets, Garland demonstrates resilience, winning 73% of these matches, while Marcinko succeeds 44% of the time.
- Marcinko capitalizes more effectively on breakpoints, converting 44.26% of opportunities, compared to Garland's 33.82% conversion rate.
Editorial Prediction (May 22, 2025, UTC):
Considering recent performance data, Marcinko exhibits a slight edge in second serve success and return games on their opponent's second serves. This suggests a potential advantage in critical junctures of the match.
Conversely, Garland's superior first serve return performance and exceptional record under pressure, particularly in deciding sets, could be pivotal. Garland's higher overall match-winning percentage and proficiency on Hard surfaces further bolster their case.
Both players have strengths; however, Garland's ability to maintain composure during tight moments, combined with a dominant winning streak in recent tournament play, signals a probable victory for Garland.
Marcinko vs Garland Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Petra Marcinko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Tereza Valentova
Player
Petra Marcinko
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
16 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Petra Marcinko
Player
Tyra Caterina Grant
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petra Marcinko
Player
Tatiana Prozorova
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Marcinko
Player
Panna Udvardy
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
51%
(
59 of
116)
6
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
7
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
51 of
116)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Petra Marcinko
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petra Marcinko
Player
Renata Zarazua
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Marcinko
Player
Miriam Bianca Bulgaru
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
40%
(
16 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
47
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Petra Marcinko
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Joanna Garland Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
Player
Joanna Garland
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Ekaterina Yashina
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yulia Putintseva
Player
Joanna Garland
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Katie Volynets
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
71%
(
58 of
82)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
42 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Petra Marcinko
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Celine Naef
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (124/69) | Win/Loss | 69% (262/119) |
| 62% (269/163) | Sets Win/Loss | 66% (559/284) |
| 55% (2138/1744) | Games Win/Loss | 58% (4371/3172) |
| 60% (28/19) | Hard Win/Loss | 71% (160/65) |
| 66% (72/37) | Clay Win/Loss | 66% (37/19) |
| 67% (24/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 65% (53/29) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 67% (12/6) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 304 | Aces Total | 809 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 540 | Total Double Faults | 1073 |
| 1:24:31 | Average Match Time | 1:36:35 |
| 352.64 | Average Opponent Rank | 444.5 |
| 59% (6920/11825) | 1st Serve % | 62% (13791/22350) |
| 64% (4403/6920) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (9036/13791) |
| 46% (2246/4905) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (4185/8559) |
| 49% (793/1610) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1520/3166) |
| 48% (5624/11749) | Return Points Win % | 48% (10974/22889) |
| 42% (5/7) | Slam W/L | 67% (4/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 77% (10/3) | Cups W/L | 50% (4/4) |
| 40% (2/3) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 66% (96/50) | Challenger W/L | 69% (173/79) |
| 69% (11/5) | Futures W/L | 72% (78/30) |
| 65% (122/188) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 69% (258/376) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 63% (26/41) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (33/63) |
| 55% (27/49) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (45/84) |
| 90% (127/114) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (247/231) |
| 10% (127/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (247/16) |
| 15% (66/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (134/30) |
Marcinko vs. Garland Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
