Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Petra Hule vs Natalie Barbir Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hule vs Barbir analysis and find out who is favored!
Petra Hule vs Natalie Barbir Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hule has won 45.66% of points on his second serve, while Barbir has won 37.06%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hule, in recent form, has won 57.82% of his opponent's second serve points, while Barbir has won 59.82%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.93% and 31.42% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hule has saved 56.87% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Barbir has saved 41.18% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hule has won 51.02% of matches played (W/L 25/ 24), with Barbir winning 25% (W/L 4/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hule has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 6/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 52/ 51). Barbir has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Hule has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.08% of matches (W/L 25/ 23), where as Barbir has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 3/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hule winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hule winning 2 and Barbir winning 0. The last match between Hule and Barbir was at the W25 Cairns, 04-10-2022, Q3, Hard with Petra Hule getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:41:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hule and Barbir have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hule winning 0 times and Barbir 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hule winning 0, and Barbir 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hule has played against opponents with an average rank of 211.78 while Barbir has played against players with an average rank of 36.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hule has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Barbir has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hule has converted 48.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Barbir has converted 39.68% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hule 1 - 0 Barbir
460
Rank
311
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
34
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
52% (65-60)
Career Total W/L
22% (34-122)
55% (12-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Petra Hule | Natalie Barbir |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 0 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:41:0 | 0:41:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (24/34) | 65% (20/31) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (18/24) | 35% (7/20) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 70% (7/10) | 0% (0/11) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 77% (24/31) | 26% (9/34) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-0 |
Stats 
Petra Hule
Player
Natalie Barbir
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve %
65%
(
20 of
31)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
16
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Petra Hule | Natalie Barbir |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (12/10) | 0% (0/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (28/23) | 20% (2/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (247/228) | 38% (36/59) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (11/9) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 29 | 5 |
| DFs per game | 0.47 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 110 | 13 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:34 | 1:45:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 193.68 | 146 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (1103/1622) | 65% (170/261) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (664/1103) | 56% (95/170) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (235/519) | 40% (36/91) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (94/188) | 33% (12/36) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (720/1561) | 41% (119/287) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (12/9) | 0% (0/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (12/22) | 0% (0/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 0% (4/0) |
Petra Hule Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Aoi Ito
Player
Petra Hule
74%
(
61 of
82)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
91)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Hule
Player
Rina Saigo
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
72%
(
60 of
83)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yexin Ma
Player
Petra Hule
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
75%
(
63 of
84)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Petra Hule
Player
Eudice Wong Chong
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Petra Hule
Player
Mei Yamaguchi
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Catherine Harrison
Player
Petra Hule
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Monique Barry
Player
Petra Hule
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Hule
Player
Bianca Compuesto
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
41%
(
17 of
41)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lanlana Tararudee
Player
Petra Hule
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
73%
(
72 of
99)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Petra Hule
Player
Miho Kuramochi
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Natalie Barbir Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Bridget Mihulka
Player
Natalie Barbir
56%
(
74 of
131)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
6
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
49%
(
28 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
43%
(
56 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
123
Total Points Won
111
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amelia Zylberman
Player
Natalie Barbir
50%
(
62 of
123)
1st Serve %
66%
(
78 of
119)
1
Aces
4
18
Double Faults
6
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
34%
(
21 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
47%
(
58 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
59 of
119)
124
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(7) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Natalie Barbir
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
74%
(
29 of
39)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alana Subasic
Player
Natalie Barbir
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
37 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 3-6 13-11 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Natalie Barbir
Player
Bianca Compuesto
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(1) 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Denise Torrealba
Player
Natalie Barbir
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
0
Aces
2
12
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 0-6 12-10 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mia Horvit
Player
Natalie Barbir
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
10 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 2-6 10-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Hule Vs Barbir Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
