Petr Brunclik vs Gerard Campana Lee Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W W L W L
Form
W L W L W W W L W LHead-To-Head: Brunclik 1 - 0 Lee
They have played 2 sets in total, with Brunclik winning 2 and Lee winning 0. The last match between Brunclik and Lee was at the Prostejov Challenger, 02-06-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Petr Brunclik getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Petr Brunclik | 1 |
| Gerard Campana Lee | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Prostejov Challenger(02-06-2025)
Petr Brunclik
Gerard Campana Lee
6
4
6
1
| Brunclik | Stats | Lee |
|---|---|---|
| 68% (23-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 49% (17-18) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 481 | Ranking | 445 |
| 481 | Highest Rank | 318 |
| 18 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 1 |
| 60% (53-36) | Career Total W/L | 52% (82-77) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Anisimova VS Swiatek PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
12 Jul 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Petr Brunclik
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:27:4 | Average Match Time | 1:27:4 |
| 59% (36/61) | 1st Serve % | 70% (32/46) |
| 64% (23/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (16/32) |
| 56% (14/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7/14) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (1/5) |
| 50% (23/46) | Return Points Win % | 39% (24/61) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Brunclik vs Lee Match Preview :
- When analyzing second serve performance over the past six months, Brunclik edges out Lee slightly, winning 45.25% of points compared to Lee's 44.1%.
- How do they fare in return games? Brunclik has a slight advantage in returning both first and second serves, winning 51.59% and 28.96% respectively, compared to Lee's 51.31% and 28.13%.
- In pressure situations, Brunclik has saved 55.45% of breakpoints, surpassing Lee at 52.51%.
- Looking at match outcomes over the past year, Brunclik has been more successful overall, winning 62% of their matches, whereas Lee has managed a 48.28% win rate.
- Brunclik's optimal performance comes on Hard courts, with a 73% win rate, while Lee excels on Clay, winning 53% of the time.
- Brunclik mostly competes in lower-tier tournaments and wins 60.98% of those matches; Lee tends to play in higher-tier events, securing victories in 49.02%.
- When it comes to crunch time in deciding sets, Brunclik holds a 53% win rate, whereas Lee has won 43% of such sets.
- Past player performance is crucial, but keep in mind that live event stats could alter the predictions depending on ongoing player form.
- Breakpoints are crucial; Brunclik converts 29.53% of opportunities, while Lee converts 27.86%.
Editorial Prediction (June 2, 2025, UTC):
As we closely examine Brunclik's and Lee's performances, several key areas highlight Brunclik’s advantage. From second serve effectiveness to breaking opponent serves, Brunclik exhibits a slight but consistent upper hand.
Under high-pressure scenarios, such as breakpoint opportunities, Brunclik demonstrates greater resilience in defense and converts these crucial points at a higher rate. Additionally, Brunclik's better performance on Hard courts, coupled with a higher overall match win percentage over the last year, underscores a more robust and versatile game.
Although Lee showcases talent, especially on Clay, and engages in higher-tier events, the statistics lean towards Brunclik's more favorable return and pressure game outcomes. Thus, based on current data trends, Brunclik is the likelier winner for the upcoming match.
Brunclik vs Lee Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Petr Brunclik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Florian Broska
Player
Petr Brunclik
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
60
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Brunclik
Player
Diego Dedura
51%
(
44 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alec Beckley
Player
Petr Brunclik
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Petr Brunclik
Player
Jose Pereira
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
38 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Brunclik
Player
Oscar Otte
31%
(
8 of
26)
1st Serve %
41%
(
12 of
29)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
9 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
36
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Brunclik
Player
Tim Handel
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
9
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Petr Brunclik
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Petr Brunclik
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Gerard Campana Lee Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Federico Bondioli
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Tibo Colson
63%
(
65 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
71 of
119)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
63 of
119)
122
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 6-7(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Simon Beaupain
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
74%
(
72 of
97)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
97)
87
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Christian Djonov
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
78%
(
36 of
46)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Laurent Lokoli
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (53/36) | Win/Loss | 52% (82/77) |
| 58% (118/87) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (192/177) |
| 53% (1020/900) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (1806/1755) |
| 73% (19/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 43% (6/8) |
| 57% (30/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (76/66) |
| 40% (4/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 207 | Aces Total | 299 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 216 | Total Double Faults | 538 |
| 1:41:22 | Average Match Time | 1:47:24 |
| 393.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 387.37 |
| 65% (3478/5386) | 1st Serve % | 62% (6582/10605) |
| 66% (2311/3478) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (4234/6582) |
| 50% (963/1908) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1956/4023) |
| 39% (268/686) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (499/1095) |
| 42% (2419/5783) | Return Points Win % | 42% (4336/10356) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 53% (8/7) | Challenger W/L | 48% (53/57) |
| 61% (45/29) | Futures W/L | 60% (29/19) |
| 60% (53/88) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (81/157) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (10/20) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (20/41) |
| 59% (17/29) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (23/51) |
| 92% (48/44) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (91/72) |
| 8% (48/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (91/19) |
| 23% (40/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (68/10) |
Brunclik vs. Lee Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
