Petr Bar Biryukov vs Ji Sung Nam Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L W L W L
Form
W W L W W W W W W LHead-To-Head: Biryukov 1 - 0 Nam
They have played 2 sets in total, with Biryukov winning 1 and Nam winning 1. The last match between Biryukov and Nam was at the Gwangju Challenger, 20-04-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Hard, with Petr Bar Biryukov getting the victory 6-7(2) 5-1 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Petr Bar Biryukov | 1 |
| Ji Sung Nam | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Gwangju Challenger(20-04-2025)
Petr Bar Biryukov
Ji Sung Nam
6
7
5
1
| Biryukov | Stats | Nam |
|---|---|---|
| 61% (27-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (15-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 322 | Ranking | 678 |
| 322 | Highest Rank | 236 |
| 23 | Age | 31 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 4 | Titles | 6 |
| 60% (143-95) | Career Total W/L | 57% (303-233) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $1,445 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cazaux VS Buse PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Carabelli VS Quinn PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
23 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(2) 5-1 ret. |
Stats 
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Ji Sung Nam
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
14
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 11 | Games Won | 8 |
| 14 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:2:53 | Average Match Time | 1:2:53 |
| 57% (28/49) | 1st Serve % | 62% (41/66) |
| 93% (26/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (26/41) |
| 57% (12/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (15/25) |
| 29% (2/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (25/66) | Return Points Win % | 22% (11/49) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Biryukov vs Nam Match Preview :
In a comprehensive analysis of the upcoming tennis match, recent performance metrics offer significant insights. Nam, over the last year, has a match win rate of 51.43% (18 wins and 17 losses), whereas Biryukov boasts a more impressive 70.89% (56 wins and 23 losses). When examining career surface performance, both players demonstrate their prowess primarily on hard courts, with Nam achieving a 58% win percentage (245 wins, 180 losses), while Biryukov has secured a 65% win record (104 wins, 55 losses). This suggests that both individuals will deliver competitive play.
Second serve effectiveness is another critical factor in this head-to-head matchup. Nam has conquered only 33.44% of points on their second serve in recent months, contrasting with Biryukov's 49.59% success rate. Return game performance further separates the two, with Nam winning 49.7% of opponent's second serve points and Biryukov securing 45.49% in similar circumstances. Nam's first serve return stands at 32.35%, while Biryukov's 22.69% implies a weaker component in his game.
Under pressure, Biryukov outperforms Nam with a breakpoint save percentage of 56.6%, compared to Nam's 41.54%. Additionally, when matches extend to a deciding set over the past year, Nam emerges victorious 55% of the time, while Biryukov outdoes this with a 64% success rate. In terms of breakpoint conversion, Nam is ahead, having exploited 45.57% of opportunities, while Biryukov falls behind with 25.73%.
Considering match level and opposition quality, Nam predominantly competes in Challengers and ITF events > $10K, achieving a 50% win rate (12 wins, 12 losses). In contrast, Biryukov plays mostly in Futures and Satellites events at $10K level, enjoying a commanding 78.72% win rate (37 wins, 10 losses). Opponent rankings provide additional context, with Nam facing players averaging a rank of 393.14 compared to Biryukov's lower tier opponents average rank of 427.91.
Taking into account these statistical comparisons, particularly Biryukov's superior win rates, second serve reliability, and performance under pressure, predictions lean toward Biryukov as the favorite to claim victory in this encounter.
Biryukov vs Nam Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Petr Bar Biryukov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mert Alkaya
Player
Petr Bar Biryukov
48%
(
38 of
79)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
7
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
9
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
42 of
49)
66%
(
27 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
20 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Isaac Nortie Nortey
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
74%
(
26 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
24%
(
19 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
25 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(8) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jorge Plans
Player
Petr Bar Biryukov
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
46%
(
29 of
63)
0
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
25 of
29)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
20 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Gilbert Klier Junior
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
13
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
31 of
34)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
34 of
40)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
10 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Petr Bar Biryukov
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Viktor Frydrych
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
48
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Mateo Matulovich
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
71%
(
30 of
42)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
42%
(
15 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
40
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Petr Bar Biryukov
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
63 of
90)
2
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
12 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ji Sung Nam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Ji Sung Nam
57%
(
70 of
122)
1st Serve %
73%
(
71 of
97)
3
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
1
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
44%
(
23 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
49%
(
60 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
106
Total Points Won
113
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Chase Ferguson
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
66 of
100)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Uisung Park
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
44%
(
20 of
45)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Jea Moon Lee
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
37 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Thanapet Chanta
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
44%
(
22 of
50)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Jay Dylan Hara Friend
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Minjong Park
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(1) 2-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sanhui Shin
Player
Ji Sung Nam
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
51)
54
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 4-4 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (143/95) | Win/Loss | 57% (303/233) |
| 59% (320/226) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (679/535) |
| 53% (2805/2528) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (5892/5354) |
| 65% (113/62) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (254/183) |
| 36% (12/21) | Clay Win/Loss | 51% (28/27) |
| 60% (18/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49% (20/21) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) |
| 0.69 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1802 | Aces Total | 993 |
| 0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 957 | Total Double Faults | 942 |
| 1:19:16 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 359.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 573.54 |
| 61% (8507/13989) | 1st Serve % | 65% (14014/21496) |
| 74% (6267/8507) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (9451/14014) |
| 50% (2757/5482) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3652/7482) |
| 41% (478/1164) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1134/2574) |
| 36% (5022/13811) | Return Points Win % | 43% (9697/22616) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (3/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 20% (1/4) |
| 55% (22/18) | Challenger W/L | 50% (105/105) |
| 61% (121/77) | Futures W/L | 62% (194/120) |
| 61% (141/232) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (294/521) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (4/4) |
| 64% (57/89) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (74/138) |
| 53% (38/72) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (72/150) |
| 85% (150/127) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (300/258) |
| 15% (150/23) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (300/41) |
| 17% (88/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (235/45) |
Biryukov vs. Nam Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
