Peter Polansky vs Tennys Sandgren Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L L L L L L
Form
W L W W W L W L W LH2H: Polansky 5 - 2 Sandgren
They have played 16 sets in total, with Polansky winning 10 and Sandgren winning 6. The last match between Polansky and Sandgren was at the Knoxville Challenger, 08-11-2021, First, I.hard with Peter Polansky getting the victory 3-6 7-6(3) 7-6(4).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Peter Polansky | 5 |
| Tennys Sandgren | 2 |
Knoxville Challenger(08-11-2021)
3
6
7
6
7
6
| Polansky | Stats | Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 5 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 721 | Ranking | 732 |
| 110 | Highest Rank | 41 |
| 36 | Age | 33 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 19 | Titles | 16 |
| 56% (541-428) | Career Total W/L | 56% (421-325) |
| $541,225 | Career Prize Money | $2,256,263 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 4 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Zheng PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Eala VS Swiatek PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-6(3) 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Peter Polansky
Player
Tennys Sandgren
62%
(
71 of
114)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
108)
9
Aces
26
3
Double Faults
10
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
50 of
60)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
0%
(
0 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
38 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
32 of
108)
108
Total Points Won
114
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 6-3 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Peter Polansky
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
10
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Tennys Sandgren
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 4-6 7-5 6-2 |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Tennys Sandgren
61%
(
66 of
108)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
36%
(
39 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
115
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Tennys Sandgren
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
49 of
83)
4
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
7
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 | |||||
| 6-3 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 10 | Sets Won | 6 |
| 86 | Games Won | 75 |
| 26 | Aces (Total) | 53 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 28 |
| 1:15:53 | Average Match Time | 1:15:53 |
| 62% (240/386) | 1st Serve % | 57% (239/420) |
| 73% (175/240) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (176/239) |
| 56% (82/146) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (79/181) |
| 30% (14/47) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (7/28) |
| 39% (165/420) | Return Points Win % | 33% (129/386) |
| 71% (5/7) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 29% (2/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (2/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (4/2) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (4/2) |
| 50% (4/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Peter Polansky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Peter Polansky
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Peter Polansky
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Peter Polansky
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michail Pervolarakis
Player
Peter Polansky
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve %
50%
(
16 of
32)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
10 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
27
Total Points Won
31
|
5-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Peter Polansky
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Peter Polansky
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Jc Aragone
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Peter Polansky
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
16
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
66
|
2-6 7-6(2) 0-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Tennys Sandgren
62%
(
71 of
114)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
108)
9
Aces
26
3
Double Faults
10
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
50 of
60)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
0%
(
0 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
38 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
32 of
108)
108
Total Points Won
114
|
3-6 7-6(3) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Peter Polansky
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
62 of
112)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
112)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Tennys Sandgren Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Tennys Sandgren
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
1-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Tennys Sandgren
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tennys Sandgren
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
43%
(
52 of
120)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Stefan Kozlov
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Dmitry Popko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
7
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Tennys Sandgren
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
12
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (541/428) | Win/Loss | 56% (421/325) |
| 55% (1253/1017) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (993/786) |
| 52% (11403/10573) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8948/8222) |
| 57% (306/227) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (241/175) |
| 53% (132/118) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (93/83) |
| 60% (92/62) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (76/57) |
| 34% (11/21) | Grass Win/Loss | 52% (11/10) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.48 |
| 2813 | Aces Total | 4008 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1705 | Total Double Faults | 1355 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:18:11 |
| 594.6 | Average Opponent Rank | 510.41 |
| 58% (26796/46045) | 1st Serve % | 61% (25668/42295) |
| 70% (18710/26796) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (18700/25668) |
| 52% (10024/19249) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (8246/16625) |
| 40% (1654/4123) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (1428/3756) |
| 38% (17382/45889) | Return Points Win % | 37% (15591/42108) |
| 51% (52/49) | Slam W/L | 44% (25/32) |
| 38% (18/30) | Masters W/L | 36% (12/21) |
| 57% (8/6) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (32/47) | Main Tour W/L | 41% (38/55) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (289/257) | Challenger W/L | 56% (195/154) |
| 78% (142/39) | Futures W/L | 71% (151/62) |
| 57% (527/932) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (402/706) |
| 26% (7/27) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 46% (17/37) |
| 53% (195/368) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (161/309) |
| 48% (146/306) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (110/236) |
| 85% (545/464) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (434/360) |
| 15% (545/80) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (434/74) |
| 18% (423/75) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (312/62) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
