Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Peter Makk vs Colin Van Beem Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Makk vs Beem analysis and find out who is favored!
Peter Makk vs Colin Van Beem Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Makk has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Beem has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Makk, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Beem has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Makk has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Beem has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Makk has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Beem winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Makk has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 21/ 24), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Beem has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 49/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Makk winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Makk winning 2 and Beem winning 1. The last match between Makk and Beem was at the M15 Antalya, 04-12-2019, First, Clay with Peter Makk getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:21:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Makk and Beem have played a deciding set 1 times, with Makk winning 1 times and Beem 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Makk winning 0, and Beem 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Makk has played against opponents with an average rank of while Beem has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Makk has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Beem has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Makk has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Beem has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Makk 1 - 0 Beem
Ret.
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
537
High
31
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
46% (23-27)
Career Total W/L
56% (191-153)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Peter Makk | Colin Van Beem |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:21:0 | 2:21:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (68/95) | 46% (45/98) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (44/68) | 67% (30/45) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (12/27) | 57% (30/53) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (5/15) | 36% (4/11) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (38/98) | 41% (39/95) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Peter Makk
Player
Colin Van Beem
72%
(
68 of
95)
1st Serve %
46%
(
45 of
98)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Peter Makk | Colin Van Beem |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Peter Makk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-4 3-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Peter Makk
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
72%
(
59 of
82)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
15 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Makk
Player
Raffael Schaer
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Peter Makk
Player
Jakub Kroslak
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
76)
66
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Fletcher Scott
Player
Peter Makk
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
47%
(
28 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Colin Van Beem Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Stefan Loncar
Player
Colin Van Beem
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Colin Van Beem
Player
Goran Radanovic
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
36 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 7-6(0) 10-7 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
Player
Colin Van Beem
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Van Beem
Player
Patrik Rikl
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Colin Van Beem
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Van Beem
Player
Gokberk Ergeneman
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Makk Vs Beem Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
