Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Peter Heller vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Heller vs Zandschulp analysis and find out who is favored!
Peter Heller vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Heller has won 50% of points on his second serve, while Zandschulp has won 50.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Heller, in recent form, has won 52.18% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zandschulp has won 49.8%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.08% and 28.46% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Heller has saved 54.86% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zandschulp has saved 61.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Heller has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 32/ 16), with Zandschulp winning 43.75% (W/L 21/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Heller has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 305/ 159), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 9/ 9). Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Heller has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.09% of matches (W/L 32/ 15), where as Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 39.13% of matches (W/L 9/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Heller winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Heller winning 0 and Zandschulp winning 2. The last match between Heller and Zandschulp was at the M25 Nussloch, 27-01-2019, Final, Carpet with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:57:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Heller and Zandschulp have played a deciding set 0 times, with Heller winning 0 times and Zandschulp 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Heller winning 0, and Zandschulp 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Heller has played against opponents with an average rank of 177.52 while Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 167.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Heller has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zandschulp has won 71% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Heller has converted 47.95% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zandschulp has converted 34.36% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Heller 0 - 1 Zandschulp
540
Rank
271
High
31
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
115
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
64% (434-245)
Career Total W/L
63% (327-193)
67% (12-6)
YTD W/L
37% (7-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$2,840,375
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Heller VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Peter Heller | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 4 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 12 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:57:0 | 0:57:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (37/53) | 63% (29/46) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (21/37) | 97% (28/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (7/16) | 41% (7/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 80% (4/5) |
| Return Points W% | 24% (11/46) | 47% (25/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Heller VS Zandschulp H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Peter Heller
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
12
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
97%
(
28 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Peter Heller | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (12/6) | 37% (7/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (25/16) | 36% (15/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (216/177) | 45% (191/231) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 36% (4/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (12/6) | 40% (2/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.44 |
| Aces Total | 49 | 89 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 28 | 57 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:46:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 92.72 | 182.95 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (710/1244) | 63% (848/1344) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (486/710) | 68% (573/848) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (276/534) | 47% (234/496) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (71/150) | 34% (39/114) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (568/1290) | 37% (486/1321) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 42% (5/7) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (12/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (12/18) | 41% (7/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 50% (5/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 75% (3/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (11/11) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (11/0) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 8% (12/1) |
Peter Heller Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Peter Heller
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Heller
Player
Dominik Kellovsky
53%
(
47 of
89)
1st Serve %
80%
(
66 of
83)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
49 of
66)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Heller
Player
Noah Perfetti
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
77%
(
65 of
84)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriele Maria Noce
Player
Peter Heller
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
96)
2
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
2
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Heller
Player
Guelfo Baldovinetti
48%
(
15 of
31)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
94%
(
15 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Heller
Player
Matthias Ujvary
45%
(
24 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Heller
Player
Gokberk Saritas
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Peter Heller
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Heller
Player
Filip Cristian Jianu
53%
(
56 of
106)
1st Serve %
83%
(
93 of
112)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
46%
(
23 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
45%
(
48 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
57 of
112)
115
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(0) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Ivan Gakhov
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve %
52%
(
57 of
110)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Federico Coria
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Rinky Hijikata
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Heller Vs Zandschulp Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Botic Van De Zandschulp
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
