Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Peter Gojowczyk vs Ruben Bemelmans Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gojowczyk vs Bemelmans analysis and find out who is favored!
Peter Gojowczyk vs Ruben Bemelmans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gojowczyk has won 40% of points on his second serve, while Bemelmans has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gojowczyk, in recent form, has won 47.37% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bemelmans has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.17% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gojowczyk has saved 58.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bemelmans has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gojowczyk has won 57.5% of matches played (W/L 23/ 17), with Bemelmans winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gojowczyk has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 207/ 147), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 113/ 128). Bemelmans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 173/ 130), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 79/ 84).
- Player level: In the last year, Gojowczyk has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.97% of matches (W/L 23/ 16), where as Bemelmans has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gojowczyk has played against opponents with an average rank of 344.27 while Bemelmans has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gojowczyk has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bemelmans has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gojowczyk has converted 44.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bemelmans has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gojowczyk 0 - 0 Bemelmans
N/A
Rank
High
34
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
36
Age
L
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Peter Gojowczyk | Ruben Bemelmans |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Peter Gojowczyk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Harold Mayot
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve %
48%
(
41 of
86)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
11
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kalin Ivanovski
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
9
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Akira Santillan
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Yanki Erel
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
17
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
109
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Alexander Cozbinov
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
52%
(
46 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
5
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
92
|
1-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Alexandre Aubriot
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
9
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
10
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ruben Bemelmans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhizhen Zhang
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
102)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Patten
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
10
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
34 of
41)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
16 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Charles Broom
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Daniel Little
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Michael Shaw
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
