Prediction of Pedro Martinez Portero [49th] vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong [175th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L W L W L W L
Form
L W L L L W L W W LHead To Head: Portero 0 - 0 Wong
| Portero | Stats | Wong |
|---|---|---|
| 43% (10-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (7-9) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 49 | Ranking | 175 |
| 36 | Highest Rank | 128 |
| 27 | Age | 20 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 16 | Titles | 2 |
| 60% (453-298) | Career Total W/L | 56% (139-109) |
| $2,416,330 | Career Prize Money | $225,210 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Pedro Martinez Portero vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Portero 0 - 0 Wong
Editorial Prediction:
Pedro Martinez Portero vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Best Odds For The Match
Pedro Martinez Portero Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Arthur Fils
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Brandon Nakashima
68%
(
79 of
117)
1st Serve %
63%
(
72 of
114)
2
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
48 of
72)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
45 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
114)
116
Total Points Won
115
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
59%
(
67 of
113)
1st Serve %
71%
(
94 of
132)
10
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
57 of
94)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
55 of
132)
126
Total Points Won
119
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
0
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
77
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
22 of
32)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
45
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Stan Wawrinka
80%
(
80 of
100)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
97%
(
30 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Corentin Moutet
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
13
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
10
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
33 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Ben Shelton
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
8
Aces
17
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
38 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
28 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Daniel Altmaier
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
19%
(
10 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Billy Harris
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
12
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
64%
(
27 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Rudolf Molleker
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Portero vs Wong?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Portero Vs Wong is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (453/298) | Win/Loss | 56% (139/109) |
| 58% (1011/747) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (311/267) |
| 53% (8691/7715) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (2848/2721) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.48 |
| 1075 | Aces Total | 1313 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 2512 | Total Double Faults | 502 |
| 1:38:12 | Average Match Time | 1:30:18 |
| 410.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 380.91 |
| 66% (30893/47134) | 1st Serve % | 60% (9161/15252) |
| 65% (20142/30893) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (6480/9161) |
| 48% (7867/16245) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2947/6091) |
| 44% (2360/5344) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (583/1447) |
| 43% (20173/47438) | Return Points Win % | 39% (5962/15383) |
| 61% (428/703) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (134/243) |
| 44% (14/32) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 55% (112/205) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (45/81) |
| 56% (127/225) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (46/81) |
| 87% (438/381) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (129/113) |
| 13% (438/56) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (129/16) |
| 22% (313/69) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (119/25) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
