Pedro Martinez Portero vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L L L L L
Form
L W W W L W L W W LHead-2-Head: Portero 0 - 2 Carabelli
They have played 6 sets in total, with Portero winning 2 and Carabelli winning 4. The last match between Portero and Carabelli was at the Rio Open - Rio de Janeiro, 19-02-2025, First, Clay with Camilo Ugo Carabelli getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pedro Martinez Portero | 0 |
| Camilo Ugo Carabelli | 2 |
Rio Open - Rio de Janeiro(19-02-2025)
4
6
6
3
6
3
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Minaur VS Fonseca PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
24 Mar 2025 / Third
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Linette VS Paolini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
78%
(
59 of
76)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| 6-2 4-6 7-6(5) |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
66%
(
75 of
113)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
103)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
46%
(
52 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
103)
112
Total Points Won
104
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
2
2
Sets Won
4
26
Games Won
33
0
Aces (Total)
12
13
Total Double Faults
3
2:45:11
Average Match Time
2:45:11
65% (117/179)
1st Serve %
68% (142/209)
60% (70/117)
1st Serve Win %
64% (91/142)
39% (24/62)
2nd Serve Win %
39% (26/67)
37% (10/27)
Break Points Won % (Total)
65% (13/20)
44% (92/209)
Return Points Win %
47% (85/179)
0% (0/2)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (2/2)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
100% (1/1)
0% (0/2)
Deciding Set Win %
100% (2/2)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
100% (1/1)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Pedro Martinez Portero vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Pedro Martinez Portero 0 - 2 Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Predictions for the Upcoming Tennis Match
- Recent Form: Second Serve Performance
- Recent Form: Return Game Statistics
- Under Pressure Analysis
- Performance Overview
- Best Surface
- Player Level
- Direct H2H Matches
- Head-to-Head Match Duration
- Deciding Set H2H Prediction
- Head-to-Head Extreme Pressure Situations
- Opponent Quality Statistics
- Deciding Set Performance vs All Players
- Current Event H2H Statistics
- Break Point Conversion
- For those intrigued by models that forecast tennis matches accurately, the following article serves as an excellent resource (Note: Recommended for statistics enthusiasts).
Within the last six months, let us delve into the recent form of the contenders. Portero has exhibited an ability to secure victory in a remarkable 48.87% of points garnered from their second serve. Contrastingly, Carabelli has displayed a slightly higher proficiency in this area, conquering 49.13% of these points. It is worth noting that there exists a notably strong correlation between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match predictions.
An examination of the contenders' return game statistics within their recent form shall provide further insights. Portero, in recent times, has been able to claim triumph in an impressive 53.87% of their opponents' second serve points. Conversely, Carabelli has showcased an even greater prowess in this domain, conquering 55.66% of these points. The same trend is observed when evaluating first serve returns, where Portero's success rate stands at 31.11%, overshadowed by Carabelli's commendable 35.86%. These figures undeniably hold substantial weight when determining who holds the advantage in this head-to-head (H2H) matchup.
An analysis of the contenders' performance under pressure reveals crucial insights. In recent times, Portero has brilliantly saved 59.09% of breakpoints they encountered. Not to be outdone, Carabelli has demonstrated an even greater resilience, managing to save an impressive 63.64% of these pivotal moments. This particular statistic serves as a valuable asset when venturing into in-game betting prognostications.
Turning our attention to a comprehensive overview of the contenders' performance, we find that over the past year, Portero has achieved victory in an admirable 54.29% of matches played (with a W/L record of 38/32). Carabelli, on the other hand, boasts an even more impressive record, prevailing in 64.71% of matches (with a W/L record of 55/30). These numbers provide us with an overarching prediction for this upcoming clash.
An evaluation of the contenders' performances on different surfaces is imperative in forecasting the outcome. Portero has exhibited their utmost proficiency on Clay, attaining a remarkable 65% win rate (W/L record of 357/191). In stark contrast, their performance on Grass has been less impressive, with a mere 29% success rate (W/L record of 4/10). Similarly, Carabelli has excelled on Clay, winning 65% of matches played (W/L record of 322/173), yet they falter on Grass, unable to secure any victories (W/L record of 0/2).
It is crucial to consider the level at which the contenders have competed when comparing their statistics to predict the favorite. In the past year, Portero has primarily participated in the Main tour, acquiring triumph in a respectable 54.05% of matches (W/L record of 20/17). Conversely, Carabelli has predominantly showcased their skills in Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding $10K, emerging victorious in an impressive 76.47% of matches (W/L record of 52/16). Hence, when determining the favorite, it is crucial to account for the level of competition each contender has encountered.
The head-to-head encounters between these contenders have unfolded on a solitary occasion. Portero has regretfully failed to claim victory thus far, while Carabelli has triumphed in all encounters. Their previous meeting transpired at the Luedenscheid Challenger, on the 18th of August 2021, played on Clay. The match itself was fiercely contested and concluded with a hard-fought victory for Carabelli (6-2, 4-6, 7-6[5]).
In past head-to-head battles, these players have engaged in intense contests lasting an average of 3 hours, 7 minutes, and 6 seconds. This statistic provides valuable insights when pondering the potential outcome of this upcoming clash.
In their prior encounters, there has been an occurrence of a deciding set on one occasion. Regrettably for Portero, they have yet to seize victory in such encounters, with Carabelli emerging triumphant each time. This statistic proves to be remarkably valuable when predicting the outcome, particularly if the match extends to its full duration.
Throughout their prior battles, these contenders have contested a solitary tiebreak. To Portero's disappointment, Carabelli has seized victory in this high-pressure scenario, registering a commendable win. This detail bears significance when evaluating the potential performance of both players under extreme duress in the forthcoming clash.
Assessing the quality of opponents faced by the contenders over the past 12 months provides a valuable perspective. Portero has engaged opponents with an average ranking of 96.53, while Carabelli has faced adversaries with an average ranking of 234.62. This disparity in opponent quality should be taken into account when contemplating the forthcoming clash.
For those keen on live predictions and betting endeavors, the contenders' performances during deciding sets become crucial. Over the past 12 months, Portero has showcased their ability to triumph in 55% of deciding sets, while Carabelli boasts an even more impressive record of winning 70% of such encounters on the professional tour. These figures offer invaluable insights when assessing the potential outcome.
While past player performance serves as a crucial factor in predicting tennis matches, it is essential to consider current event statistics to gauge the indicators of an in-form player. Therefore, we must direct our attention to the section below (if available) for a meticulous evaluation of their performance in the ongoing event. Moreover, certain players tend to excel or struggle in specific events, impacting the outcome selection significantly.
Examining the conversion rates of both contenders during recent form provides predictive clues for in-game live betting. Portero has exhibited commendable efficiency, converting 39.79% of breakpoint opportunities. Meanwhile, Carabelli demonstrates an even more impressive proficiency, converting 48.48% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. These statistics undeniably hold significance when strategizing in live betting scenarios.
Pedro Martinez Portero Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
97%
(
30 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Corentin Moutet
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
13
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
78%
(
59 of
76)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Damir Dzumhur
75%
(
84 of
112)
1st Serve %
74%
(
77 of
104)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
44 of
77)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
47%
(
53 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
108
|
0-6 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Camilo Ugo Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Alex Michelsen
67%
(
75 of
112)
1st Serve %
76%
(
73 of
96)
3
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
51 of
73)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
38 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
102
|
6-7(3) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Brandon Holt
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
73%
(
72 of
98)
8
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
2
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
101
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
12
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
27 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Mitchell Krueger
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Federico Coria
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Thiago Moura Monteiro
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
104)
7
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
4
85%
(
57 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
48 of
66)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
30 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Nicolas Jarry
61%
(
73 of
119)
1st Serve %
53%
(
57 of
108)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
77%
(
56 of
73)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
48 of
57)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
36 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
33 of
108)
116
Total Points Won
111
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
60% (450/295)
Win/Loss
64% (364/208)
58% (1004/738)
Sets Win/Loss
60% (802/524)
53% (8621/7635)
Games Win/Loss
54% (6620/5630)
50% (69/68)
Hard Win/Loss
54% (35/30)
65% (357/193)
Clay Win/Loss
65% (328/175)
45% (20/24)
Indoor Hard W/L
50% (1/1)
29% (4/10)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/2)
0.13
Aces Per Game
0.17
1068
Aces Total
1036
0.31
Double Faults Per Game
0.21
2499
Total Double Faults
1263
1:37:55
Average Match Time
1:41:20
409.07
Average Opponent Rank
363.05
65% (30531/46639)
1st Serve %
62% (22949/37055)
65% (19917/30531)
1st Serve Win %
66% (15246/22949)
48% (7799/16112)
2nd Serve Win %
50% (6985/14105)
44% (2345/5302)
Break Points Won % (Total)
45% (1976/4359)
43% (19980/46936)
Return Points Win %
43% (16194/37607)
55% (32/26)
Slam W/L
42% (8/11)
33% (15/30)
Masters W/L
36% (4/7)
50% (1/1)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
50% (71/71)
Main Tour W/L
50% (19/19)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
60% (144/95)
Challenger W/L
65% (187/99)
72% (187/71)
Futures W/L
67% (146/72)
61% (425/697)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
64% (353/550)
44% (14/32)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
54% (7/13)
54% (111/204)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
55% (80/145)
56% (124/221)
Deciding Set Win %
59% (104/177)
87% (436/379)
1st Set Won, Won Match
89% (336/298)
13% (436/56)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
10% (336/35)
22% (309/68)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
28% (236/65)
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Camilo Ugo Carabelli
View full predicted draw for Carabelli in Miami
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
