Pavle Marinkov vs Yuichiro Inui Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W L W W L W W W W L
Form
W L W L W L L W L LHead-to-head: Marinkov 1 - 0 Inui
They have played 2 sets in total, with Marinkov winning 2 and Inui winning 0. The last match between Marinkov and Inui was at the M25 Burnie, 17-02-2025, Q3, Hard with Pavle Marinkov getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
M25 Burnie(17-02-2025)
6
3
6
4
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Yuan VS Siniakova PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Joint VS Masarova PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
17 Mar 2025 / Q3
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Pavle Marinkov
Player
Yuichiro Inui
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
50%
(
38 of
76)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
7
5
Aces (Total)
7
2
Total Double Faults
3
1:36:11
Average Match Time
1:36:11
67% (35/52)
1st Serve %
50% (38/76)
77% (27/35)
1st Serve Win %
63% (24/38)
53% (9/17)
2nd Serve Win %
45% (17/38)
33% (4/12)
Break Points Won % (Total)
67% (2/3)
46% (35/76)
Return Points Win %
31% (16/52)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Pavle Marinkov vs Yuichiro Inui Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Pavle Marinkov 1 - 0 Yuichiro Inui
- Recent form and second serve performance: Over the past six months, Marinkov has displayed a second serve performance of winning 51.51% of points, whereas Inui has exhibited a slightly superior performance with a 53.15% success rate. It is noteworthy to mention that there exists a strong correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
- In-depth analysis of the return game stats: Examining Marinkov's recent form, it becomes evident that they have dominated their opponents' second serve by securing 48.65% of the points. In comparison, Inui has displayed a commendable performance by winning 51.15% of these vital points. Similarly, in first serve returns, the respective percentages stand at 29.76% for Marinkov and 30.45% for Inui. These statistics hold significant value in determining the favored contender during their highly anticipated head-to-head matchup.
- Under pressure moments: When placed under immense pressure, Marinkov has proven their resilience by saving 58.91% of breakpoints in their recent matches. Inui, on the other hand, demonstrated a saving rate of 58.65%. This statistically valuable information aids in making more accurate in-game betting predictions.
- Overview of their performance: Taking into account their performances over the past year, Marinkov has achieved a success rate of 47.22% in winning matches (with a win/loss ratio of 17/19). In contrast, Inui has outshone Marinkov with an impressive 53.19% success rate (winning 25 out of 47 matches played). These figures provide an overview of their head-to-head prediction.
- Pinnacle of performance on various surfaces: Marinkov's unparalleled expertise is most prominently displayed on the hard surface, securing victories in 56% of their matches (winning 34 out of 61 matches played). Conversely, their performance on clay is less remarkable, with a 40% success rate (winning 4 out of 10 matches). Inui demonstrates a similar pattern, excelling on I.hard with a win rate of 50% (winning 3 out of 6 matches), while their performance on grass remains suboptimal at 33% (winning 1 out of 3 matches).
- Player proficiency: Over the past year, Marinkov has primarily competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize purse of $10K, achieving a victory rate of 48% (winning 12 out of 25 matches played). Inui has showcased their exceptional skills in similar tournaments, triumphing in 53.19% of their matches (winning 25 out of 47 matches played). Comparing these statistics allows for a relative assessment of the players and aids in predicting the favorite, contingent on the event level they have been competing in.
- Opponent quality as a determining factor: Over the past twelve months, Marinkov has encountered opponents with an average rank of 418.22, highlighting the challenges they have confronted. Conversely, Inui has contended against competitors with a significantly lower average rank of 216.51. This discrepancy in opponent quality sheds light on the varying degrees of difficulty both players have faced.
- Deciding set performance: For those keenly interested in live predictions and betting, should this match extend to a decisive set, it is imperative to know that Marinkov has managed to secure victory in a staggering 67% of deciding sets within the past twelve months. In contrast, Inui's performance in these situations has been less optimal, with a winning percentage of 44% in matches played on the tour. These statistics enable astute bettors to make informed decisions during in-game wagers.
- Current event H2H statistics: While past player performance serves as a valuable tool in predicting tennis matches, it is essential to observe current event statistics for indications of in-form players. Interested individuals should refer to the section below for this comprehensive analysis (if players have thus far participated in the current event). Furthermore, it is vital to consider that certain players may exhibit enhanced performance at specific events, a crucial factor to contemplate before determining the ultimate outcome.
- Break point conversion rate: Analyzing recent performances, Marinkov has impressively converted 38.81% of their breakpoint opportunities, showcasing their proficiency in capitalizing on crucial points. In comparison, Inui has displayed a slightly lower conversion rate of 35.29% when presented with chances to break their opponents' serve. This particular statistic is of great significance for in-game live betting tips, particularly when either player finds themselves in a breakpoint scenario.
- If you are intrigued by models that accurately predict the outcomes of tennis matches, this compelling article serves as an excellent starting point (Warning: Reserved for those with an affinity for statistical analysis).
Pavle Marinkov Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F |
![]() ![]()
Omar Jasika
Player
Pavle Marinkov
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
4
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Pavle Marinkov
Player
Blake Ellis
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve %
68%
(
17 of
25)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
13 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
26
Total Points Won
21
|
5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Pavle Marinkov
Player
Jake Delaney
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
49%
(
44 of
89)
12
Aces
21
7
Double Faults
9
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve Won
93%
(
41 of
44)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
33 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Pavle Marinkov
Player
Duje Markovina
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
71%
(
64 of
90)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Pavle Marinkov
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
57)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Pavle Marinkov
83%
(
55 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Pavle Marinkov
Player
Tsung-Hao Huang
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Pavle Marinkov
Player
Takuya Kumasaka
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
11
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Joshua Charlton
Player
Pavle Marinkov
77%
(
60 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Pavle Marinkov
Player
Yuichiro Inui
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
50%
(
38 of
76)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Yuichiro Inui Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tomislav Edward Papac
Player
Yuichiro Inui
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
12
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
103)
97
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ethan Cook
Player
Yuichiro Inui
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Hyeon Chung
Player
Yuichiro Inui
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Pavle Marinkov
Player
Yuichiro Inui
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
50%
(
38 of
76)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-7(1) 14-12 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Naoki Tajima
Player
Yuichiro Inui
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 | 3-6 7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | |||
QF | 6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
55% (47/39)
Win/Loss
44% (133/168)
52% (100/93)
Sets Win/Loss
46% (311/367)
52% (948/890)
Games Win/Loss
50% (3173/3231)
56% (37/29)
Hard Win/Loss
44% (96/123)
40% (4/6)
Clay Win/Loss
45% (29/36)
0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L
54% (7/6)
60% (6/4)
Grass Win/Loss
25% (1/3)
0.35
Aces Per Game
0.28
309
Aces Total
880
0.27
Double Faults Per Game
0.15
237
Total Double Faults
475
1:23:39
Average Match Time
1st Match
350.15
Average Opponent Rank
289.55
58% (2610/4498)
1st Serve %
56% (5575/10005)
71% (1852/2610)
1st Serve Win %
71% (3971/5575)
49% (934/1888)
2nd Serve Win %
47% (2080/4431)
37% (169/458)
Break Points Won % (Total)
39% (312/803)
38% (1751/4594)
Return Points Win %
36% (3524/9658)
0% (0/2)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
47% (9/10)
Challenger W/L
33% (5/10)
58% (38/27)
Futures W/L
45% (128/158)
54% (46/85)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
45% (133/298)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/2)
36% (8/22)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
35% (29/84)
68% (15/22)
Deciding Set Win %
43% (32/75)
94% (47/44)
1st Set Won, Won Match
83% (143/119)
6% (47/3)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
17% (143/24)
8% (39/3)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
9% (158/14)
Other Predictions
- Loading news...