S. G. Hernandez
To Win
H. Maia
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W W W L W LForm
L W L W L W L W L LThey have played 3 sets in total, with Verbin winning 2 and Maia winning 1. The last match between Verbin and Maia was at the M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio, 17-02-2025, Q3, Hard with Pavel Verbin getting the victory 6-3 4-6 10-6.
M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio(17-02-2025)
- / Q2 round
Miami Open - Miami wta
17 Mar 2025 / Q3
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 4-6 10-6 |
![]() ![]()
Pavel Verbin
Player
Hugo Maia
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
58 of
81)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Predictions Analysis: Tennis Match Insights
Recent Second Serve Performance: Examining the recent form over the past six months, it is evident that Verbin has showcased remarkable proficiency on their second serve, triumphing in an impressive 51.65% of points. On the other hand, Maia has unfortunately failed to secure any triumphs in this regard. This statistic has a substantial correlation with the accuracy of match predictions.
Return Game Statistics in Recent Form: A close inspection of return game statistics reveals that Verbin, in recent form, has been successful in conquering 51.31% of their opponents' second serve points, whereas Maia has been unable to clinch any such victories. The corresponding figures for first serve returns stand at 29.8% for Verbin and a regretful 0% for Maia. These statistics play a significant role in determining the favored contender in this head-to-head matchup.
Under Pressure Analysis: With regards to handling pressure, Verbin has demonstrated great resilience. In recent form, they have managed to save an impressive 59.38% of breakpoints. Conversely, Maia's performance in this aspect has been lackluster, with a saving rate of 0%. This statistic holds considerable value for in-game betting predictions.
Performance Overview: Over the course of the past year, Verbin has boasted a success rate of 58% in matches played, amassing 29 wins and 21 losses. Maia, on the other hand, has achieved a slightly higher success rate of 60%, with 6 victories and 4 losses. An overall head-to-head prediction overview can be derived from these statistics.
Preferred Surface: Verbin has demonstrated their utmost proficiency on the hard surface, securing victories in 60% of matches (35 wins and 23 losses). In contrast, their performance on clay has not been as commendable, with a winning rate of 53% (52 wins and 46 losses). Maia's highest success rate has been recorded on indoor hard courts, winning 50% of matches (1 win and 1 loss), while their performance on clay has been rather disappointing, with a 0% success rate (0 wins and 2 losses).
Player Level: Assessing the competition level, Verbin has primarily participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize of $10K, securing victories in 58% of matches (29 wins and 21 losses). Conversely, Maia has predominantly engaged in matches within the same tournament category, achieving a success rate of 60% (6 wins and 4 losses). It is essential to consider the relative event level in order to compare and predict the favorite player accurately.
Opponent Quality Statistics: Analyzing the opponents encountered in the last 12 months, Verbin has faced adversaries with an average rank of 289.22, while Maia's opponents have held an average rank of 0.
Deciding Set Performance vs All Players: For those interested in live predictions and betting, it is noteworthy that Verbin has triumphed in 53% of deciding sets played over the past year. Maia, meanwhile, has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 50% in all matches on the tour.
Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: Although past player performance provides valuable insights for predicting tennis matches, it is equally crucial to consider current event statistics to gauge players' current form. For an indication of in-form players, refer to the section below (only applicable if the players have participated in the ongoing event). Additionally, certain players tend to excel in specific events, and this factor should be taken into account when making predictions.
Break Point Conversion: In recent form, Verbin has successfully converted 41.27% of breakpoint opportunities, showcasing their ability to capitalize on crucial moments. In contrast, Maia has been unfortunate, failing to convert any of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This statistic is instrumental when seeking live betting tips, especially when either player encounters a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are intrigued by models that predict tennis matches, refer to this article (Warning: Intended for statistical enthusiasts only).
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Anthony Genov
Player
Pavel Verbin
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
85%
(
46 of
54)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 1-6 6-2 10-2 | H2H | |||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Cezar Cretu
Player
Pavel Verbin
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Pavel Verbin
Player
Francisco Rocha
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
73
|
0-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Pavel Verbin
Player
Hugo Maia
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
58 of
81)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 4-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Gunawan Trismuwantara
Player
Pavel Verbin
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
49
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Shunsuke Nakagawa
Player
Pavel Verbin
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Duckhee Lee
Player
Pavel Verbin
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Pavel Verbin
Player
Shu Matsuoka
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
23 of
27)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
47
Total Points Won
51
|
0-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Pavel Verbin
Player
Hugo Maia
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
58 of
81)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 4-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 3-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
QF | 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Guilherme Valdoleiros
Player
Hugo Maia
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 2-6 6-0 13-11 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jackson Ross
Player
Hugo Maia
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 4-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jackson Ross
Player
Hugo Maia
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
72%
(
67 of
93)
2
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 5-7 10-5 | H2H |
view more