Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Pauline Parmentier vs Madison Brengle Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Parmentier vs Brengle analysis and find out who is favored!
Pauline Parmentier vs Madison Brengle Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Parmentier has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Brengle has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Parmentier, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Brengle has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Parmentier has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brengle has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Parmentier has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Brengle winning 50% (W/L 14/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Parmentier has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 117/ 86), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 24% (W/L 8/ 25). Brengle has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 340/ 236), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 45/ 45).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Parmentier winning 0 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Parmentier winning 3 and Brengle winning 6. The last match between Parmentier and Brengle was at the Internationaux de Strasbourg - Strasbourg, 22-05-2017, First, Clay with Madison Brengle getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:47:29.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Parmentier and Brengle have played a deciding set 3 times, with Parmentier winning 0 times and Brengle 3 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Parmentier winning 0, and Brengle 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Parmentier has played against opponents with an average rank of while Brengle has played against players with an average rank of 150.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Parmentier has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brengle has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Parmentier has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brengle has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Parmentier 0 - 3 Brengle
Ret.
Rank
40
High
38
Age
R
Plays
0
Total3
0
Hard0
0
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass1
260
Rank
35
High
34
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
51% (436-422)
Career Total W/L
56% (556-436)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,515,645
Career Prize Money
$2,482,006
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Parmentier VS Brengle H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Pauline Parmentier | Madison Brengle |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 6 |
| Games Won | 36 | 47 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:47:29 | 0:47:29 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (64/102) | 83% (95/114) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (40/64) | 60% (57/95) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 34% (13/38) | 37% (7/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (5/14) | 60% (6/10) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (50/114) | 48% (49/102) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/3) | 100% (3/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/3) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Parmentier VS Brengle H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 4-6 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Madison Brengle
Player
Pauline Parmentier
83%
(
95 of
114)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
102)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
44%
(
50 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
113
Total Points Won
103
|
||||
| 6-2 3-6 6-4 | |||||
| 6-1 3-6 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Pauline Parmentier | Madison Brengle |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Pauline Parmentier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Pauline Parmentier
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magda Linette
Player
Pauline Parmentier
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Pauline Parmentier
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
7
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
41 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
95)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 5-7 7-5 10-6 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-3 14-12 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 5-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 2-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 6-7(5) 10-7 | H2H | |||
view more
Madison Brengle Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Johanne Svendsen
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
44%
(
16 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
50%
(
24 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Sahaja Yamalapalli
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
17 of
34)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
7
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Madison Brengle
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
105)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
51%
(
43 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
105)
94
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Madison Brengle
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
85%
(
39 of
46)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Madison Brengle
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Irina Khromacheva
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Madison Brengle
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
86%
(
49 of
57)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
43%
(
17 of
40)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Su Jeong Jang
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Mary Stoiana
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Parmentier Vs Brengle Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
