Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Paula Badosa Gibert vs Fiona Ferro Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gibert vs Ferro analysis and find out who is favored!
Paula Badosa Gibert vs Fiona Ferro Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gibert has won 45.95% of points on his second serve, while Ferro has won 47.85%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gibert, in recent form, has won 57.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ferro has won 55.87%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.87% and 37.73% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gibert has saved 67.72% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ferro has saved 54.64% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gibert has won 53.85% of matches played (W/L 14/ 12), with Ferro winning 59.68% (W/L 37/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gibert has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 162/ 86), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 15/ 12). Ferro has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 199/ 127), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Gibert has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 8/ 5), where as Ferro has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.42% of matches (W/L 29/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Gibert winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Gibert winning 4 and Ferro winning 1. The last match between Gibert and Ferro was at the French Open - Paris, 24-05-2022, First, Clay with Paula Badosa Gibert getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:24.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gibert and Ferro have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gibert winning 1 times and Ferro 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gibert winning 0, and Ferro 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gibert has played against opponents with an average rank of 146.88 while Ferro has played against players with an average rank of 262.84.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gibert has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ferro has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gibert has converted 43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ferro has converted 44.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gibert 2 - 0 Ferro
93
Rank
2
High
26
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
144
Rank
39
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
64% (342-193)
Career Total W/L
56% (305-242)
43% (6-8)
YTD W/L
56% (10-8)
$4,840,519
Career Prize Money
$1,390,722
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Paula Badosa Gibert | Fiona Ferro |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 29 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 11 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:24 | 1:33:24 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (90/133) | 61% (86/141) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (66/90) | 51% (44/86) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 37% (16/43) | 35% (19/55) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (13/23) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (78/141) | 38% (51/133) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats 
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Fiona Ferro
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
23
|
||||
| 5-7 6-4 6-0 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Fiona Ferro
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
43 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
53 of
101)
105
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Paula Badosa Gibert | Fiona Ferro |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (6/8) | 56% (10/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (16/16) | 60% (27/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (148/146) | 52% (214/194) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 75% (6/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 40% (2/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 61 | 23 |
| DFs per game | 0.51 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 73 | 40 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:33 | 1:42:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 222.29 | 318.39 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (577/1021) | 66% (908/1386) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (393/577) | 62% (559/908) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (204/444) | 49% (234/478) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (43/100) | 46% (73/159) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (386/947) | 45% (597/1332) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 75% (3/1) |
| Masters W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (2/4) | 67% (2/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (6/11) | 56% (10/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 22% (2/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (6/4) | 69% (13/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (6/2) | 31% (13/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 20% (5/1) |
Paula Badosa Gibert Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
66%
(
70 of
106)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(4) 4-6 3-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Diana Shnaider
51%
(
44 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
4
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
8
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Simona Halep
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lulu Sun
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
17 of
22)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
11 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
38
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leylah Annie Fernandez
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
88)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
10
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
0-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
45%
(
43 of
96)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
47%
(
25 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
42 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diana Shnaider
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
57
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 3-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Lanlana Tararudee
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
3
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
7
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Fiona Ferro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Fiona Ferro
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
70%
(
71 of
101)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
95
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Timea Babos
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Manon Leonard
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Fiona Ferro
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
2-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Fiona Ferro
75%
(
74 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
6-1 6-7(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Fiona Ferro
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
88)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
48 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Panna Udvardy
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Polina Kudermetova
Player
Fiona Ferro
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Fiona Ferro
57%
(
56 of
99)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
120)
7
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
7
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
52 of
80)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
50 of
120)
115
Total Points Won
104
|
5-7 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Alina Charaeva
55%
(
44 of
80)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Gibert Vs Ferro Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
