Paula Cembranos vs Sylvie Zund Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L L W W L L
Form
W L L W W L W W W LHead-2-Head: Cembranos 1 - 0 Zund
They have played 2 sets in total, with Cembranos winning 2 and Zund winning 0. The last match between Cembranos and Zund was at the W75 Bellinzona, 07-04-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Paula Cembranos getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Paula Cembranos | 1 |
| Sylvie Zund | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W75 Bellinzona(07-04-2025)
Paula Cembranos
Sylvie Zund
6
4
6
3
| Cembranos | Stats | Zund |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (10-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 52% (11-10) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | 819 |
| Highest Rank | 785 | |
| 21 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 58% (48-35) | Career Total W/L | 52% (111-103) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sramkova VS Swiatek PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Muchova VS Parks PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Paula Cembranos
Player
Sylvie Zund
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
50%
(
23 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:9:23 | Average Match Time | 1:9:23 |
| 72% (33/46) | 1st Serve % | 56% (25/45) |
| 58% (19/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (12/25) |
| 31% (4/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (6/20) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 60% (27/45) | Return Points Win % | 50% (23/46) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cembranos vs Zund Match Preview :
In the last six months, a crucial stat to consider is the performance on the second serve. Cembranos has secured 36.88% of points on their second serve, while Zund has achieved a slightly better rate of 40.19%. This particular statistic is known for its strong connection to predicting match outcomes.
When it comes to returning the second serve, Cembranos outperforms with a 55.28% success rate in recent months, whereas Zund stands at 48.02%. For first serve returns, they are closely matched with 35.35% for Cembranos and 34.76% for Zund. Such return stats are highly relevant for determining the favored player in a head-to-head matchup.
Analyzing how they perform under pressure, Cembranos has saved 43.14% of break points in recent form, while Zund has demonstrated a stronger breakpoint save rate of 50%. This statistic can provide valuable insights for real-time betting predictions.
Examining their overall performance over the past year, Cembranos boasts a higher match win rate of 64.71% (W/L 22/12) compared to Zund's 51.28% (W/L 20/19). This gives us a comprehensive view of their head-to-head prediction.
Surface preferences reveal that Cembranos excels on hard courts with a career win percentage of 62% (W/L 24/15), whereas Zund is more successful on clay with a 53% win rate (W/L 89/79). Both players record their lowest performances on indoor hard courts. Such surface statistics help in assessing match predictions.
Regarding the levels of tournaments played, Cembranos participated extensively in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K in the past year, securing a win rate of 72% (W/L 18/7). In contrast, Zund played significantly in the same category, achieving a 50% win rate (W/L 10/10). The event level plays a significant role when evaluating player statistics for predictions.
A relevant statistic for comparing the quality of opponents faced, over the last 12 months, shows Cembranos facing players with an average rank of 271.88, slightly lower than Zund's average opponent rank of 268.79.
If the match progresses to a deciding set, Cembranos holds a slight edge, having won 73% of these sets over the last year, compared to Zund's 67% win rate in similar scenarios. Such stats are critical for live predictions and bets during matches.
The break point conversion rates further illustrate their effectiveness; Cembranos has successfully converted 42.2% of breakpoint chances, outpacing Zund's 37.93%. This statistic is crucial for live betting analyses whenever a breakpoint arises in the match.
Combining these statistics, Cembranos appears to have a slight advantage heading into the match. Factors like second serve performance, return stats, and pressure-handling capability collectively suggest that Cembranos could emerge victorious. However, factors such as current event stats and peculiar player performance tendencies in specific events can still have a bearing on the final outcome.
Cembranos vs Zund Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Paula Cembranos Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Tabunshchyk
Player
Paula Cembranos
72%
(
70 of
97)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
9
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
26%
(
7 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
51%
(
49 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
6-1 3-6 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamilla Bartone
Player
Paula Cembranos
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
89)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 2-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paula Cembranos
Player
Didi Bredberg Canizares
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
2
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
8
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
52%
(
35 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katarina Zavatska
Player
Paula Cembranos
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Deborah Chiesa
Player
Paula Cembranos
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
50%
(
41 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paula Cembranos
Player
Sylvie Zund
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
50%
(
23 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katarina Kuzmova
Player
Paula Cembranos
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Sylvie Zund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Carlota Martinez Cirez
Player
Sylvie Zund
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve %
70%
(
14 of
20)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
37%
(
10 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
30
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sylvie Zund
Player
Ines Leon
77%
(
61 of
79)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sylvie Zund
Player
Claudia Ferrer Perez
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
55
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-7(6) 4-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Natalija Senic
Player
Sylvie Zund
48%
(
26 of
54)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sylvie Zund
Player
Chantal Sauvant
75%
(
64 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sylvie Zund
Player
Ela Plosnik
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lavinia Tanasie
Player
Sylvie Zund
63%
(
56 of
89)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
48%
(
27 of
56)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
51%
(
45 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (48/35) | Win/Loss | 52% (111/103) |
| 56% (104/82) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (245/223) |
| 52% (879/800) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2230/2037) |
| 60% (26/17) | Hard Win/Loss | 47% (14/16) |
| 57% (16/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (95/84) |
| 50% (6/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 33 | Aces Total | 16 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 244 | Total Double Faults | 291 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 259.35 | Average Opponent Rank | 123.53 |
| 69% (2373/3445) | 1st Serve % | 70% (4599/6607) |
| 57% (1352/2373) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (2579/4599) |
| 39% (419/1072) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (896/2008) |
| 52% (214/413) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (462/928) |
| 46% (1575/3388) | Return Points Win % | 48% (3328/6895) |
| 39% (9/14) | Challenger W/L | 48% (29/32) |
| 65% (39/21) | Futures W/L | 54% (82/71) |
| 57% (46/80) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (109/209) |
| 50% (5/10) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (11/21) |
| 57% (13/23) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (19/44) |
| 95% (41/39) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (115/97) |
| 5% (41/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (115/17) |
| 21% (42/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (99/13) |
Cembranos vs. Zund Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
