Prediction of Paula Badosa Gibert vs Nao Hibino Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
65% (376-206)
Career Total W/L
55% (387-316)
60% (3-2)
YTD W/L
75% (6-2)
$6,809,968
Career Prize Money
$1,493,057
0
YTD Titles
0
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Paula Badosa Gibert vs Nao Hibino Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gibert 0 - 0 Hibino
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gibert has won 46.31% of points on their second serve, while Hibino has won 46.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gibert, in recent form, has won 57.31% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hibino has won 58.61%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.9% and 35.89% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gibert has saved 62.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hibino has saved 52.52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gibert has won 66.1% of matches played (W/L 39/ 20), with Hibino winning 50% (W/L 31/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gibert has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 167/ 89), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 26/ 19). Hibino has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 283/ 212), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 45/ 55).
- Player level: In the last year, Gibert has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 14/ 8), where as Hibino has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 45% of matches (W/L 9/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gibert has played against opponents with an average rank of 59.2 while Hibino has played against players with an average rank of 154.68.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gibert has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hibino has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gibert has converted 49.45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hibino has converted 46.4% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Paula Badosa Gibert Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Talia Gibson
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
56%
(
18 of
32)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
51
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Xinyu Wang
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
53%
(
62 of
116)
1st Serve %
52%
(
54 of
104)
5
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
8
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
52%
(
28 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
43%
(
50 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(4) 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Peyton Stearns
62%
(
73 of
118)
1st Serve %
69%
(
75 of
108)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
42%
(
50 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
117
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(5) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
69%
(
72 of
104)
1st Serve %
55%
(
45 of
82)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
44%
(
46 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
69%
(
63 of
91)
1st Serve %
53%
(
54 of
101)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daria Kasatkina
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve %
50%
(
17 of
34)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
13 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
39%
(
13 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
36
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Xiyu Wang
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
7
Aces
4
12
Double Faults
3
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
33%
(
13 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
88)
102
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Diana Shnaider
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
8
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Nao Hibino
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
6
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
4
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Harriet Dart
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
.jpg)
Nao Hibino
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
71 of
119)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
10
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
38%
(
10 of
26)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
66 of
119)
115
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Marina Stakusic
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
48%
(
37 of
77)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Nao Hibino
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Jule Niemeier
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Sachia Vickery
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Elyse Tse
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
49%
(
27 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Ana Bogdan
Player
Nao Hibino
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yue Yuan
Player
Nao Hibino
69%
(
67 of
97)
1st Serve %
77%
(
84 of
109)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
47%
(
46 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
56 of
109)
107
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Gibert vs Hibino?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Gibert Vs Hibino is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Paula Badosa Gibert | Nao Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (3/2) | 75% (6/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (8/5) | 72% (13/5) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (70/57) | 56% (94/73) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 75% (6/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.16 |
| Aces Total | 18 | 13 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0.34 |
| DFs Total | 22 | 28 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:53 | 1:34:31 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 65.2 | 112.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (245/413) | 67% (347/519) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (167/245) | 57% (197/347) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (82/168) | 54% (93/172) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (22/51) | 45% (42/93) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (186/418) | 50% (289/579) |
| Slam W/L | 100% (2/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 75% (3/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 75% (6/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Paula Badosa Gibert
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
