Prediction of Paula Badosa Gibert vs Maja Chwalinska Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
65% (376-206)
Career Total W/L
67% (222-110)
60% (3-2)
YTD W/L
75% (3-1)
$6,809,968
Career Prize Money
$330,620
0
YTD Titles
0
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Gibert VS Chwalinska H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Paula Badosa Gibert vs Maja Chwalinska Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gibert 0 - 0 Chwalinska
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gibert has won 46.31% of points on their second serve, while Chwalinska has won 50%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gibert, in recent form, has won 57.31% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chwalinska has won 56.91%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.9% and 45% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gibert has saved 62.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chwalinska has saved 48.28% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gibert has won 66.1% of matches played (W/L 39/ 20), with Chwalinska winning 71.43% (W/L 50/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gibert has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 167/ 89), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 26/ 19). Chwalinska has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 130/ 53), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 31/ 23).
- Player level: In the last year, Gibert has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 14/ 8), where as Chwalinska has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 72.88% of matches (W/L 43/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gibert has played against opponents with an average rank of 59.2 while Chwalinska has played against players with an average rank of 273.14.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gibert has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chwalinska has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gibert has converted 49.45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chwalinska has converted 52.97% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Paula Badosa Gibert Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Talia Gibson
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
56%
(
18 of
32)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
51
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Xinyu Wang
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
53%
(
62 of
116)
1st Serve %
52%
(
54 of
104)
5
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
8
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
52%
(
28 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
43%
(
50 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(4) 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Peyton Stearns
62%
(
73 of
118)
1st Serve %
69%
(
75 of
108)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
42%
(
50 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
117
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(5) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
69%
(
72 of
104)
1st Serve %
55%
(
45 of
82)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
44%
(
46 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
69%
(
63 of
91)
1st Serve %
53%
(
54 of
101)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daria Kasatkina
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve %
50%
(
17 of
34)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
13 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
39%
(
13 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
36
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Xiyu Wang
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
7
Aces
4
12
Double Faults
3
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
33%
(
13 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
88)
102
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Diana Shnaider
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
8
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Maja Chwalinska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Maja Chwalinska
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
21 of
35)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Brenda Fruhvirtova
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Marie Benoit
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
78%
(
59 of
76)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Dominika Salkova
74%
(
104 of
141)
1st Serve %
71%
(
98 of
139)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
57%
(
59 of
104)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
57 of
98)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
45%
(
64 of
141)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
61 of
139)
138
Total Points Won
142
|
7-6(3) 5-7 7-6 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Leolia Jeanjean
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Ylena In-Albon
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
82%
(
31 of
38)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Mayar Sherif
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Oleksandra Oliynykova
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Angela Fita Boluda
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
0
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Darja Semenistaja
Player
Maja Chwalinska
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
89)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Gibert vs Chwalinska?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Gibert Vs Chwalinska is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Paula Badosa Gibert | Maja Chwalinska |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (3/2) | 75% (3/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (8/5) | 60% (6/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (70/57) | 51% (47/46) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 75% (3/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 18 | 4 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 22 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:53 | 2:4:15 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 65.2 | 160.25 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (245/413) | 70% (225/320) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (167/245) | 55% (124/225) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (82/168) | 52% (49/95) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (22/51) | 42% (16/38) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (186/418) | 46% (155/340) |
| Slam W/L | 100% (2/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 75% (3/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 0% (1/0) |
See recent tennis photos of Gibert and Chwalinska .
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Paula Badosa Gibert
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
